以驗證性因素分析評估二代競賽狀態焦慮量表修正版之效度和信度

Evaluating Validity and Reliability of Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2R) by Confirmatory Factor Analyses

10.5297/ser.200803_10(1).0005

李烱煌(Chiung-Huang Li)

競賽焦慮 ； 自信心 ； 身體焦慮 ； 認知焦慮 ； competitive anxiety ； self-confidence ； somatic anxiety ； cognitive anxiety

大專體育學刊

10卷1期（2008 / 03 / 01）

63 - 74

繁體中文;英文

本研究目的在利用驗證性因素分析以校正樣本修正二代競賽狀態焦慮量表修正版的因素結構，利用驗證性因素分析以效度樣本評估修正模式的因素效度、幅合效度、區別效度和信度以及利用驗證性因素分析評估修正模式在校正樣本和效度樣本之間的複核效度。各組樣本各有199名青少年手球選手（共計398名），皆自願填寫二代競賽狀態焦慮量表修正版。在校正樣本方面，驗證性因素分析的結果顯示原始模式（二代競賽狀態焦慮量表修正版）具有可接受的適配度，然而，第六題因它的Lagrange增值指標大於10而被刪除。刪除第六題後，修正模式（16題－二代競賽狀態焦慮量表修正版）的適配度優於原始模式。在效度樣本方面，驗證性因素分析的結果顯示修正模式不僅具有良好的適配度，而且也有良好的幅合效度、區別效度和信度。再者，修正模式在校正樣本和效度樣本間的複核效度具有良好的適配度。因此，本研究認為16題－二代競賽狀態焦慮量表修正版能被用來測量青少年的競賽狀態焦慮。

This study used the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to revise the factor structure of the CSAI-2R by a calibration sample, the CFA to evaluate the factorial, convergent, and discriminate validity, and reliability of the revised structure by a validation sample, and then the CFA to evaluate the cross validity of the revised structure between the calibration and validation samples. Each sample consisted of 199 adolescent handball athletes (totally N=398), all of whom were voluntary to complete CSAI-2R. In the calibration sample, the results of CFA revealed an acceptable fit to the initial model (CSAI-2R). However, Item 6 was deleted because its Lagrange Multiplier Index was greater than 10. After deleting Item 6, the fit of the revised model (16-item CSAI-2R) was better than the initial model. In the validation sample, results of CFA not only revealed a good fit, but also good convergent validity, discriminate validity, and reliability to the revised model. Furthermore, the results of CFA showed that the fit of cross validity of the revised model between calibration and validation samples was also good. Therefore, it is suggested that 16-item CSAI-2R can be used to measure competitive state anxiety in adolescent athletes.

1. Bentler, P. M.(1990).Comparative fit indices in structural models.Psychological Bulletin,107,238-246.
2. Cox, R. H.,Martens, M. P.,Russell, W. D.(2003).Measuring anxiety in athletics: The Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,25,519-533.
3. Cronbach, L. J.,R. L. Thorndike (Ed.)(1971).Educational measurement.Washington, D. C.:American Council on Education.
4. Diamantopoulos, A.,Siguaw, J. A.(2000).Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
5. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
6. Gorsuch, R. L.(1983).Factor analysis.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6(1),1-55.
8. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörborn, D.(1989).LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications.Chicago:Scientific Software International.
9. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford Press.
10. Lane, A. M.,Sewell, D. F.,Terry, P. C.,Bartram, D.,Nesti, M. S.(1999).Confirmatory factor analysis of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2.Journal of Sport Sciences,17,505-512.
11. Loehlin, J. C.(1998).Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
12. Lundqvist, C.,Hassmen, P.(2005).Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2): Evaluating the Swedish version by confirmatory factor analyses.Journal of Sport Sciences,23,727-736.
13. Martens, R.,Burton, D.,Rivkin, F.,Simon, J.,C. H. Dadeau,W. C. Halliwell,K. M. Newell,G. C. Roberts (Eds.)(1980).Psychology of motor behavior and sport-1979.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
14. Martens, R.,Burton, D.,Vealey, R. S.,Bump, L. A.,Smith, D. E.,R. Martens, R. S. Vealey,D. Burton (Eds.)(1990).Competitive anxiety in sport.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
15. Ostrow, A. C.(1996).Directory of psychological tests in the sport and exercise sciences.Morgantown, WV:Fitness Information Technology.
16. Schutz, R. W.,Eom, H. J.,Smoll, F. L.,Smith, R. E.(1994).Examination of the factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,65,226-236.
17. Tsorbatzoudis, H.,Varkoukis, V.,Kaissidis-Rodafinos, A.,Grouios, G.(1998).A test of the reliability and factorial validity of the Greek version of the CSAI-2.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,69,416-419.
18. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式LISREL的理論與應用。台北市:雙葉書廊。
19. 黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程模式在教育資料應用之研究。台北市:五南。
20. 黃英哲、季力康(1994)。運動動機氣候與自覺能力對賽前狀態性焦慮和滿足感的相究。體育學報，18，321-332。

1. 呂青山(2012)。大專籃球運動員硫酸脫氫表雄淄酮變化與賽前焦慮之關係。大專體育學刊，14(1)，134-140。
2. 蘇子炘、郭國隆、林献巃、李士賢、李士範(2013)。全國大專排球運動聯賽代表隊支持度研究。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，12(3)，186-198。
3. 鄭桂玫、潘豐泉、徐茂洲(2011)。2004-2009 結構方程模式在體育領域論文運用之探討。運動休閒管理學報，8(2)，19-37。
4. 鄭桂玫、徐茂洲(2012)。結構方程模型的統計檢定力計算及樣本數決定在《大專體育學刊》之運用。大專體育，123，25-34。