健身運動心理需求滿足感量表信效度分析

Reliability and Validity Analysis of Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale

10.5297/ser.1202.002

蔡俊傑(Jun-Jie Tsai)

自我決定理論 ； 測量不變性 ； 同時多群組共變數分析 ； 複核效化 ； self-determination theory ； measurement invariance ； simultaneous multigroup covariance analyses ； cross-validation

大專體育學刊

12卷2期（2010 / 06 / 01）

11 - 21

繁體中文;英文

本研究目的以Wilson, Rogers, Rodgers, and Wild (2006)建立的「健身運動心理需求滿足感量表」予以中文化並加以修訂，建一份適合測臺灣地區參與健身運動人員心理需求滿足感的中文工具。本量表以Deci and Ryan(1985)的「自我決定理論」（self-determination theory，簡稱SDT）為理論基礎，包含3個因素，勝任感、自主性、關聯性，共計18題，本研究包含兩個階段性研究，研究方法包含項目分析、探索式因素分析、驗證式因素分析以及同時多群組共變數分析。研究結果顯示該量表具有建構效度所需「內容代表性」和「內部結構」。結論，本量表具有良好信效度，未來研究可以運用本量表與其它領域的結合。

The present study was based on Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale proposed by Wilson, Rogers, Rodgers and Wild (2006) and aimed to develop a revised scale of Chinese version for the Taiwanese athletes. The theoretical foundation of the scale was according to Self-determination Theory by Deci and Ryan (1985) that includes three factors competence, autonomy and relevance with a total of 18 questions. This investigation consisted of two studies and the constructive validity as well as internal validity was used in two different studies, Scales of item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and simultaneous multigroup covariance analyses were carried out. The results showed that the scale has construct validity of ”content representativeness” and the ”internal structure.” This study concluded that the scale had good reliability and validity, future research could use the scale to combine with other study areas.

1. AERA,APA,NCME(1999).Standards for educational and psychological testing.Washington, DC:AERA.
2. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103,411-423.
3. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation o f structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16(1),76-94.
4. Baumeister, R. E,Leary, M. R.(1995).The need to be long: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Psychological Bulletin,117,497-529.
5. Boggiano, A. K.(ed.),Pittman, T. S.(ed.)(1992).Achievement and motivation: A socialde velopmental perspective.New York:Cambridge University Press.
6. Bollen, K. A.(ed.),Long, J. S.(ed.)(1993).Testing structural equation models.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
7. Campbell, D. T.,Fiske, D. W.(1959).Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin,56,81-105.
8. Cheung, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9,233-255.
9. De Charms, R.(1968).Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior.New York:Academic Press.
10. Deci, E. L.(ed.),Ryan, R. M.(ed.)(2002).Handbook of self-determination research.Rochester, NY:University of Rochester Press.
11. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.New York:Plenum Press.
12. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(2002).Hand book of self-determination research.Rochester, NY:University of Rochester Press.
13. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unbervables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
14. Hagger, M, S.,Chatzisarantis, N. L. D.,Culverhouse, T.,Biddle, S. J. H.(2003).The process by which perceive d autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: A trans-contextual model.Journal of Educational Psychology,95,784-795.
15. Hoyle, R. H.,Smith, G. T.(1994).Formula ting clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: A conceptual overview.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology,62,429-440.
16. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6(1),1-55.
17. Jöreskog, K. G.(1971).Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations.Psychometrika,36,409-426.
18. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1989).LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications.Chicago:SPSS.
19. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).Little Jiffy, Mark IV.Educational and Psychological Measurement,34,111-117.
20. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford Press.
21. LaGuardia, J. G.,Ryan, R. M.,Couchman, C. E.,Deci, E. L.(2000).Within-person variation security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,79,367-384.
22. Li, F.(1999).The exercise motivation scale: Its multifaceted structure and construct validity.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,11,97-115.
23. Maslow, A. H.(1987).Motivation and personality.New York:Harper.
24. Mullan, E.,Markland, D.(1997).Variations in self-determination across the stages of change for exercise in adults.Motivation & Emotion,21,349-362.
25. Roberts, G. C.(ed.)(2001).Advances in motivation in sport and exercise.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
26. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2000).Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist,55,68-78.
27. Sato, T.(2001).Autonomy and relatedness in psychopathology and treatment: A cross-cultural formulation.Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs,127,89-127.
28. Vansteenkiste, M.,Simons, J.,Soenens, B.,Lens, W.(2004).How to become a persevering exerciser? Providing a clear, future intrinsic goal in an autonomy supportive way.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,26,232-249.
29. White, R. W.(1959).Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.Psychological Review,66,297-333.
30. Wilson, P. M.,Rodgers, W. M.,Fraser, S. N.(2002).Examining the psychometric properties of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire.Measurement in Physical Education & Exercise Science,6,1-21.
31. Wilson, P. M.,Rodgers, W. M.,Fraser, S. N.,Murray, T, C.(2004).Relationships between exercise regulations and motivational consequences in university students.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,75,81-91.
32. Wilson, P. M.,Rogers, W. T.,Rodgers, W. M.,Wild, T. C.(2006).The Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,28,231-251.
33. Wolman, B. B.(1973).Dictionary of behavior sciences.New York:Yen Nostrand Reinhold CO.
34. 吳明隆(2007)。結構方程模式AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市:五南。
35. 李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。臺北市:心理。
36. 季力康、賴素玲、陳美燕(1995)。大專網球選手運動目標取向與運動動機之相關研究。體育學報，20，1-12。
37. 林正常、王順正(2002)。健康運動的方法與保健。臺北市:師大書苑。
38. 陳順宇(2007)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。臺北市:心理。
39. 陳敬能(1998)。週休二日對運動休閒教育之啓示。大專體育，40，131-135。
40. 黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學—結構方程模式。臺北市:五南。
41. 黃英哲、季力康(1994)。運動動機氣候與自覺能力對賽前狀態性焦慮和滿足感的相關研究。體育學報，18，321-332。
42. 蔡祐慈、黃英哲(2004)。健身運動三向度成就目標取向之初探。國立臺北師範學院學報，17(1)，557-570。
43. 蔡銘仁(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學體育學系研究所。
44. 盧俊宏(1998)。從事體適能運動所帶來的106種利益。臺灣省學校體育，8(5)，17-23。

1. 郭國隆(2022)。優秀排球運動員之主觀活力預測。運動教練科學，68，1-13。
2. 黃泰盛(2018)。大學排球選手熱情、基本心理需求及運動幸福感之預測分析。臺灣體育學術研究，65，39-56。
3. 廖主民,沈緯鈞,吳蕙如,廖主民,沈緯鈞,吳蕙如(2023)。歸屬需求量表中文化編製與法則網絡。體育學報，56(3)，299-317。
4. 劉兆達,楊裕隆,李文心(2019)。排球運動員之熱情、基本心理需求及運動員倦怠的關係。臺大體育學報，37，13-25。
5. 楊朝行、陳克舟(2018)。職場新人排球運動心理需求、工作情緒與運動行為之研究。運動休閒管理學報，15(3)，66-80。
6. 楊亮梅、陳俊民(2016)。運動員基本心理需求量表之初探。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，15(3)，1-11。
7. 鄭桂玫、徐茂洲(2012)。結構方程模型的統計檢定力計算及樣本數決定在《大專體育學刊》之運用。大專體育，123，25-34。
8. 鄭為仁、洪至祥、孔建嘉(2018)。以網球迷的角度探討網球場域管理、學習明星球技、球技進步滿足度與再次使用網球場之實證研究。運動休閒管理學報，15(2)，75-88。