高中體育教師專業指標之建構與驗證

Construction and Verification of Professional Indices for High School Physical Education Teachers

10.5297/ser.1203.002

潘義祥(Yi-Hsiang Pan)

德懷術 ； 驗證性因素分析 ； 體育課程 ； Delphi method ； confirmatory factor analysis ； physical education curriculum

大專體育學刊

12卷3期（2010 / 09 / 30）

11 - 23

繁體中文;英文

本研究目的在建構以民國95年施行的高中體育課程綱要為基準之體育教師專業指標，並考驗指標的信效度。研究方法採用德懷術(Delphi method)與驗證性因素分析(confirmatory factor analysis)等方法，研究對象在德懷術方面有22位學者專家，驗證性因素分析方面以分層隨機叢集抽樣方式，共獲293位高中體育教師為有效樣本，並以LISREL統計方式進行假設模式適配度考驗。本研究結果指出高中體育教師專業指標共含3個一級指標、12個二級指標、59個三級指標，一級指標分成專業知識、專業能力、專業態度等3個構面。專業知識構面有4個二級指標（包含課程總綱認知、體育綱要認知、教育專業知識、體育專門知識）；專業能力構面下有5個二級指標（包含運動指導能力、體育課程規劃、體育教學策略、體育教學評量、運動風險管理）；專業態度構面下有3個二級指標（含有體育教師信念、教師敬業精神、專業成長動向）；驗證性因素分析顯示模式的適配度頗佳。研究結論指出本研究所建構的高中體育教師專業指標，具有良好的信效度，未來可做為評估高中體育教師專業素質及專業發展之用。

The purpose of this study was to construct a set of Professional Indices for High School Physical Education Teachers (PIHSPET) after the new physical education curriculum guidelines of Taiwanese senior high schools was issued in 2006. The validity and reliability of the PIHSPET were examined. The research methods included Delphi method and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Initially, 22 physical education experts were assigned and served in Delphi method to construct the PIHSPET. Then, 293 high school physical education teachers, sampled by stratified random cluster sampling method, finished the PIHSPET questionnaires. The questionnaires were analyzed by CFA by using the LISREL statistical program The results showed that PIHSPET included 3 first-level indices, 12 second-level indices and 59 third-level indices. The first-level indices contains 3 dimensions including professional knowledge, professional competence and professional attitude. The professional knowledge dimension contains 4 second-level indices including cognition of general curriculum guideline, cognition of physical education curriculum guideline, general pedagogical knowledge and content knowledge of physical education. The professional competence dimension has 5 second-level indices including teaching capacity in sport, curricular plan in physical education, teaching strategy in physical education, teaching evaluation in physical education and risk management in sport. The professional attitude dimension contains 3 second-level indices including physical education teachers' belief, teachers' professional spirit and perspective of professional growth. The CFA indicated that the goodness-of-fit of the modification model could reach an acceptable standard. It is concluded that the PIHSPET is a well-consedered method with fair validity and reliability. It may be used to evaluate professional quality and developmental needs for high school physical education teachers.

1. 李坤培(2005)。大專校院運動風險管理認知分析及實證研究。臺大體育學報，7，103-125。
   連結：
2. 程瑞福(2000)。臺灣地區中小學體育教師專業能力之研究。體育學報，28，123-132。
   連結：
3. Ballinger, D. A.(1993).Becoming an effective physical educator.Physical Educator,50(1),13-19.
4. Bell, M.(1997).The development of expertise.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,68(2),34-38.
5. Chedzoy, S.(2000).Students' perceived competence to teach physical education to children aged 7 to 11 years in England.European Journal of Physical Education,5(1),104-127.
6. Chen, W.(2006).Teachers' knowledge about and views of the national standards for physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,25(1),120-142.
7. Demirhan, G.,Acikada, C.,Altay, F.(2001).Students perceptions of physical education teacher qualities.Journal of the International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport and Dance,37(3),15-18.
8. Diamantopoulos, A.,Siguaw, J . A.(2000).Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
9. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1981).LISREL: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood and least squares methods.Chicago:National Educational Resources.
10. Joycem, M. H.,Connie, L. B.(1992).Instructional strategies for secondary schools physical education.Dubuque, IA:Wm. C. Brown.
11. Kirkwood, M.,Christie, D.(2006).The role of teacher research in continuing professional development.British Journal of Educational Studies,54,429-448.
12. Malm, B.,Lofgren, H.(2006).Teacher competence and student' conflict handling strategies.Research in Education,76,62-73.
13. Raskin, M. S.(1994).The Delphi study in field instruction revision: Experts consensus on issues and research priorities.Journal of Social Work Education,30(1),75-89.
14. Rink, J. E.(1997).Teacher education programs: The role of context in learning how to teach.Journal of Physical Education, Rrecreation and Dance,68(1),17-19.
15. Shehu, J.,Mokgwathi, M.(2007).Mapping physical education student teacher competencies and developmental needs: Insight from the University of Botswana teaching practice assessment dataset 1998-2004.International Journal of Applies Sports Sciences,19(2),50-62.
16. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Education Review,57,1-22.
17. Tan, S. K. S.(1997).The elements of expertise.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,68(2),30-31.
18. Todd, R. F.,Reece, C. C.(1989).Desirable skills and knowledge outcomes for an introductory educational research course: A Delphi study.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Francisco, CA:
19. Zakrajsek, P.,Woods, G.(1983).A survey of professional practice elementary and secondary physical educators.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,54(9),65-67.
20. 王文科(1997)。教育研究法。臺北市:五南。
21. 王誼邦(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學運動科學研究所。
22. 沈志強(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
23. 侯銀華(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北縣，輔仁大學體育學研究所。
24. 孫志麟(1996)。亞太地區教育成就指標比較分析。教育研究資訊，4(2)，70-87。
25. 教育部體育司編(2004)。中華民國九十三學年度高中體育組長會議手冊。臺北市:教育部體育司。
26. 許義雄、程瑞福(2000)。,臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會政府研究資訊系統。
27. 黃芳銘(2006)。社會科學統計方法學。臺北市:五南。
28. 黃瑞榮(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所。
29. 廖芷妤(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所。
30. 鄭一龍(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立體育學院運動科學研究所。
31. 簡茂發、李虎雄、黃長司、彭森明、吳清山、吳明清(1997)。中小學教師應具備的基本素質。教育研究資訊，5(3)，13-23。

1. 賴姍姍,賴永成,黃筱淳(2022)。學生參與體育特色課程運動樂趣對學習滿意度之研究－以明德高中為例。運動休閒餐旅研究，17(2)，1-15。
2. 林靜萍、李怡貞(2015)。公立高中（職）體育科教師甄選方式與專業能力之研究。臺灣運動教育學報，10(2)，1-20。
3. 潘義祥(2011)。高中學校本位體育課程發展評鑑指標之建構。體育學報，44(4)，571-592。
4. 潘義祥、彭楚雲(2012)。探討澳洲昆士蘭大學健康與體育師資培育課程之架構。中華體育季刊，26(1)，107-114。
5. 潘義祥、蒲逸悧、黃品榮、周宏室、石偉源(2017)。後現代思潮下體育教師信念指標之建構及權重分析。體育學報，50(2)，219-232。
6. 施亦婕,林靜萍(2020)。臺灣與大陸桌球教練證照研習培訓課程之比較。運動教練科學，57，1-12。
7. 楊正群(2018)。大專校院體育教師專業能力指標之建構。成大體育，50(2)，65-90。
8. 張琪,高士傑,卓俊伶(2021)。應用德爾菲法建構女子跳馬前手翻因素評量表。運動研究，30(1)，49-64。
9. 鄭光慶(2011)。臺灣地區國中健康與體育學習領域教師評鑑指標之建構。體育學報，44(3)，459-480。
10. 鄭桂玫、徐茂洲(2012)。結構方程模型的統計檢定力計算及樣本數決定在《大專體育學刊》之運用。大專體育，123，25-34。