漸增情境干擾結合漸退回饋：檢驗動作學習的附加效應

Increasing Contextual Interference Combined with Faded Feedback: An Examination of Additive Effect for Motor Learning

10.5297/ser.1604.003

王重引(Chung-Yin Wang)；卓俊伶(Hank Jun-Ling Jwo)

挑戰點假說 ； 工作難度 ； 學習變項 ； challenge point hypothesis ； task difficulty ； learning variable

大專體育學刊

16卷4期（2014 / 12 / 01）

378 - 386

繁體中文;英文

練習安排與外增回饋為影響動作學習的重要因素，過去研究發現漸增情境干擾與漸退回饋均為學習變項。然而，結合兩變項時是否更增進動作學習效果尚未釐清。因此，本研究目的為探討漸增情境干擾結合漸退回饋的動作學習附加效應。40名成年人隨機分派至隨機練習全部回饋、隨機練習漸退回饋、漸增情境干擾全部回饋或漸增情境干擾漸退回饋等四組。實驗工作為序列相對時宜按鍵動作，共計進行108次獲得期試作及24小時後的12次保留測驗試作。研究結果發現：一、在獲得期中，區間的絕對誤差值達顯著差異；二、在保留測驗中，漸增情境干擾漸退與全部回饋組間的絕對誤差值與總變異值無顯著差異；漸增情境干擾漸退回饋組與全部回饋組的絕對誤差值顯著小於隨機練習漸退與全部回饋組。本研究結論：漸增情境干擾練習結合漸退回饋無動作學習的附加效應。

Practice scheduling and augmented feedback are important factors that influence motor learning. Previous studies found that increasing contextual interference (ICI) practice and faded feedback (FF) are the learning variables. However, beneficial effect of combining these two variables on motor learning is still unclear. Thus, this study was designed to examine the additive effect for motor learning by combining the increasing contextual interference practice with faded feedback. Forty adults were randomly assigned into four groups: Random-all feedback, random-FF, ICI-all feedback, and ICI-FF groups. Sequential relative timing movement was utilized as an experimental task. One hundred and eight trails were performed in the acquisition phase. Twenty four hours later, twelve trails in the retention test were completed. The obtained results were as follows: (1) AE (absolute error) was significantly different in blocks during acquisition phase. (2) For retention test, AE and E (total variability) were not significantly different between the group combined ICI practice with all feedback and the group combined ICI with FF. Furthermore, AE of groups combined FF and all feedback with ICI practice were found to be significantly lower than that of groups combined FF and all feedback with random practice. In conclusion, no additive effect for motor learning was found when combined increasing contextual interference practice with faded feedback.

1. Aloupis, C. H.,Guadagnoli, M. A.,Kohl, R. M.(1995).Manipulation of task switches during acquisition: A test of traditional contextual interference hypotheses.Journal of Human Movement Studies,29,171-180.
2. Bjork, R. A.(1999).Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions.Attention and performance,Cambridge, MA:
3. Bruechert, L.,Lai, Q.,Shea, C. H.(2003).Reduced knowledge of results frequency enhances error detection.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,74(4),467-472.
4. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
5. Del Rey, P.,Shewokis, P.(1993).Appropriate summary KR for learning timing tasks under conditions of high and low contextual interference.Acta Psychologica,83(1),1-12.
6. Gentile, A. M.(1972).A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching.Quest,17(1),3-23.
7. Goodman, J. S.,Wood, R. E.(2009).Faded versus increasing feedback, task variability trajectories, and transfer of training.Human Performance,22(1),64-85.
8. Guadagnoli, M. A.,Holcomb, W. R.,Weber, T. J.(1999).The relationship between contextual interference effects and performer expertise on the learning of a putting task.Journal of Human Movement Studies,37(1),19-36.
9. Guadagnoli, M. A.,Lee, T. D.(2004).Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning.Journal of Motor Behavior,36(2),212-224.
10. Hall, K. G.,Magill, R. A.(1995).Variability of practice and contextual interference in motor skill learning.Journal of Motor Behavior,27(4),299-309.
11. Hebert, E. P.,Landin, D.,Solmon, M. A.(1996).Practice schedule effects on the performance and learning of low-and high-skilled students: An applied study.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,67(1),52-58.
12. Lee, T. D.,Magill, R. A.(1985).Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition?.Advances in Psychology,27,3-22.
13. Lee, T. D.,Wishart, L. R.(2005).Motor learning conundrums (and possible solutions).Quest,57(1),67-78.
14. Lin, C. H. J.,Wu, A. D.,Udompholkul, P.,Knowlton, B. J.(2010).Contextual interference effects in sequence learning for young and older adults.Psychology and Aging,25(4),929-939.
15. Magill, R. A.(2011).Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications.New York:MaGraw-Hill.
16. Magill, R. A.,Hall, K. G.(1990).A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition.Human Movement Science,9(3-5),241-289.
17. Metcalfe, J.(Ed.),Shimamura, A. P.(Ed.)(1994).Metacognition: Knowing about knowing.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
18. Moxley, S. E.(1979).Schema: The variability of practice hypothesis.Journal of Motor Behavior,11(1),65-70.
19. Porter, J. M.,Magill, R. A.(2010).Systematically increasing contextual interference is beneficial for learning sport skills.Journal of Sports Sciences,28(12),1277-1285.
20. Porter, J. M.,Saemi, E.(2010).Moderately skilled learners benefit by practicing with systematic increases in contextual interference.International Journal of Coaching Science,4(2),61-71.
21. Salmoni, A. W.,Schmidt, R. A.,Walter, C. B.(1984).Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal.Psychological Bulletin,95(3),355-386.
22. Schmidt, R. A.(1975).A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning.Psychological Review,82(4),225-260.
23. Schmidt, R. A.,Lee, T. D.(2011).Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
24. Shea, J. B.,Morgan, R. L.(1979).Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,5(2),179-187.
25. Sidaway, B.,Bates, J.,Occhiogrosso, B.,Schlagenhaufer, J.,Wilkes, D.(2012).Interaction of feedback frequency and task difficulty in children's motor skill learning.Physical Therapy,92(7),948-957.
26. Sullivan, K. J.,Kantak, S. S.,Burtner, P. A.(2008).Motor learning in children: Feedback effects on skill acquisition.Physical Therapy,88(6),720-732.
27. Sweller, J.,Van Merrienboer, J. J. G.,Paas, F. G. W. C.(1998).Cognitive architecture and instructional design.Educational Psychology Review,10(3),251-296.
28. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
29. Winstein, C. J.,Schmidt, R. A.(1990).Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,16(4),677-691.
30. Wright, D. L.,Magnuson, C. E.,Black, C. B.(2005).Programming and reprogramming sequence timing following high and low contextual interference practice.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,76(3),258-266.
31. Wu, W. F.,Young, D. E.,Schandler, S. L.,Meir, G.,Judy, R. L.,Perez, J.(2011).Contextual interference and augmented feedback: Is there an additive effect for motor learning?.Human Movement Science,30(6),1092-1101.
32. Wulf, G.,Lee, T. D.,Schmidt, R. A.(1994).Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning.Journal of Motor Behavior,26(4),362-369.
33. Wulf, G.,Schmidt, R. A.(1989).The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,15(4),748-757.
34. Wulf, G.,Schmidt, R. A.,Deubel, H.(1993).Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,19(5),1134-1150.

1. 卓俊伶,王重引(2020)。藉自我控制工作難度與回饋提升自主性：動作表現與學習的檢驗。臺灣運動心理學報，20(3)，43-58。