反智傾向的運動哲學論述

A Discourse of Philosophy of Sport With Anti-Intellectual Tendency

10.5297/ser.202206_24(2).0001

蔡宗儒(Tsung-Ju Tsai)；石明宗(Ming-Tsung Shih)

智性能力 ； 反智主義 ； 智識教育 ； intellectual ability ； anti-intellectualism ； intellectual education

大專體育學刊

24卷2期（2022 / 06 / 30）

143 - 163

繁體中文;英文

本文旨在對東西方哲學整體發展做了深入的探究，並釐清「反智」所指涉的內涵與脈絡。經過分析與釐清後，本文整理出反智傾向的運動哲學4個特點。首先，反智傾向的運動哲學並非完全拒斥智性能力，而只是對智性能力提出了批判。第二，反智傾向的運動哲學觀點仍然必須透過語言文字來表達。第三，反智傾向的運動哲學觀點與其他科學相同，目標皆在追求真理，只是在方法上略有不同。前者透過打破傳統智性能力的框架追求真理，後者則透過實徵經驗與實驗。兩者之間存在著不可共量性。第四，本文區分了「反智傾向」與「反智主義」的不同。前者是指對傳統智性能力作為追求真理方法的批判，後者則是指對整體智識教育的反對。前者雖然批判智性能力，但並不反對追求真理與智慧。就這一點來說，反智傾向的運動哲學與反智主義的立場有著根本上的不同，也因此並不是一種反智主義。本文的結論為反智傾向的運動哲學觀點除了解釋運動場上的現象外，也讓我們能以更開放多元的態度面對運動，進而獲得更多美好與深刻的體驗。

This article aims to investigate the overall development of Eastern and Western philosophy and clarifies the content and context of the ＂anti-intellectual.＂ After analysis and clarification, this article describes four characteristics of ＂philosophy of sport with an anti-intellectual tendency＂ (PSAIT). First, PSAIT does not completely reject intellectual ability, but only proposes a critique of intellectual ability. Second, PSAIT must still unavoidably be expressed through language. Third, like other sciences, the goal of PSAIT is to pursue the truth, but its method is slightly different. PSAIT seeks truth by breaking the limitations of the framework of traditional intellectual abilities, while other sciences seek truth through empirical research and experimentation. The two philosophies are incommensurate. Fourth, this article distinguishes between ＂anti-intellectual tendency＂ and ＂anti-intellectualism.＂ The former refers to the criticism of traditional intellectual ability as a method of pursuing truth, while the latter refers to the opposition to intellectual education. Although the former criticizes intellectual ability, it does not oppose the pursuit of truth and wisdom. In this regard, PSAIT is fundamentally separate and distinct from anti-intellectualism. The conclusion is that PSAIT not only explains phenomena in the sports field but also provides us with an open and diverse attitude when we exercise and allow us to have more beautiful and profound experiences.

1. 呂潔如, C.-J.(2010)。身體定位─探討運動哲學研究中的尼采。運動文化研究，14，35-54。
   連結：
2. 辛正根, J.-K.(2020)。老子對「知」的肯否定和對「明」的肯定。哲學與文化，47(2)，3-17。
   連結：
3. 劉創馥, C.-F.(2013)。《精神現象學》中的思辯命題。歐美研究，43(2)，415-453。
   連結：
4. Breivik, G.(2014).Sporting knowledge and the problem of knowing how.Journal of the Philosophy of Sport,41(2),143-162.
5. Buchner, H.(Ed.),Jantzen, J.(Ed.)(1980).F.W. J. V. Schelling, Werke.Stuttgart, Germany:Frommann-holzboog.
6. Copleston, F.(2003).A history of philosophy.London, UK:Continuum.
7. Descartes, R.,Cottingham, J.(Trans. Eds.)(1986).Meditations on first philosophy: With selections from the objections and replies.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
8. Dummett、 M.,王路（譯）, L.(Trans.)(2005).分析哲學的起源.上海市=Shanghai, China:上海譯文=Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
9. Fantl, J.(2017).Knowledge how.The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy
10. Fumerton, R.(2006).Epistemology.Malden, MA:Blackwell.
11. Gallwey, T.(1974).The inner game of tennis.New York, NY:Random House.
12. Habermas, J.(1981).Modernity versus postmodernity.New German Critique,22,3-14.
13. Hegel, G. W.,di Giovanni, G.(Trans.)(2010).The science of logic.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
14. Hegel, G. W.,Miller, A. V.(Trans.)(1977).The phenomenology of spirit.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
15. Heidegger, M.(2006).Sein und Zeit.Tübingen, Germany:Max Niemeyer Verlag.
16. Herrigel、 E.,顧法嚴（譯）, F.-Y.(Trans.)(1999).射藝中的禪.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:慧炬=Torch of Wisdom.
17. Hyams, J.(1979).Zen in the martial arts.New York, NY:Tarcher Putnam US.
18. Kant, I.,Guyer, P.(Trans. Eds.),Wood, A. W.(Trans. Eds.)(1998).Critique of pure reason.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
19. Kenny, A.(2006).A new history of western philosophy, volume 3: The rise of modern philosophy.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
20. Kuhn, T. S.(1996).The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
21. Millman, D.(2000).Way of the peaceful warrior: A book that changes lives.Tiburon, CA:H J Kramer.
22. Monahan, M.(2007).The practice of self-overcoming: Nietzschean reflections on the martial arts.Journal of the Philosophy of Sport,34(1),39-51.
23. Nietzsche, F.,Whiteside, S.(Trans.)(2003).The birth of tragedy.London, UK:Penguin.
24. Polanyi, M.(1974).Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
25. Russell, B.(2004).History of western philosophy.London, UK:Routledge.
26. Ryle, G.(2009).The concept of mind.New York, NY:Routledge.
27. Ryle, G. (1945-1946). Knowing how and knowing that: The presidential address. Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society New Series, 46, 1-16.
28. Yamada, S.(2001).The myth of zen in the art of archery.Japanese Journal of Religious Studies,28(1-2),1-30.
29. 石明宗, M.-T.(2007).登山客與博士─山難、運動與宗教之體驗.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:頂點文化事業=Dingdian Culture Enterprise.
30. 何志青, J.-C.(2018).知識論的轉折.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:國立臺灣大學出版中心=National Taiwan University Press.
31. 何俊, J.(1998)。中國哲學傳統中的反智論傾向。哲學與文化，25(5)，461-467。
32. 沈清松（編）, V.(Ed.)(2002).哲學概論.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan.
33. 沈清松, V.(1993)。從現代到後現代。哲學雜誌，4，4-25。
34. 林朝成, C.-C.,郭朝順, C.-S.(2017).佛學概論.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:三民=San Min.
35. 姚衛群, W.-Q.(1996).印度哲學.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:淑馨=Shu-Shin.
36. 胡名霞, M.-S.(2019).動作控制與動作學習.新北市=New Taipei, Taiwan:金名=Kingdom.
37. 陳鼓應, G.-Y.(1996).尼采新論.香港=Hong Kong, China:商務印書館=The Commercial Press.
38. 陳鼓應, G.-Y.(2007).老莊新論.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan.
39. 陳鼓應, G.-Y.(2000).老子今註今譯及評介.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press.
40. 陳榮華, W.-W(2006).海德格存有與時間闡釋.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:國立臺灣大學出版中心=National Taiwan University Press.
41. 傅偉勳, C. W.-H(2014).西洋哲學史.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:三民=San Min.
42. 彭孟堯, E. M.(2015).哲學方法論.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:新學林=New Sharing.
43. 程志明, C.-M.(2008).後現代哲學思潮概論.新北市=New Taipei, Taiwan:康德=Kant.
44. 項退結, T.(1989).西洋哲學辭典.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:國立編譯館=National Institute of Compilation and Translation.
45. 飲茶,江裕真（譯）, Y.-J.(Trans.)(2015).史上最強哲學入門─從釋迦牟尼、孔孟到禪宗,啟悟自我內心的 13 位東方哲人.新北市=New Taipei, Taiwan:大牌=Streamer.
46. 馮友蘭, Y.-L.(2005).中國哲學簡史.香港=Hong Kong, China:三聯=Joint.
47. 馮耀明, Y.-M.(1989).中國哲學的方法論問題.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:允晨文化=Asian Culture.
48. 黃國鉅, K.-K(2014).尼采：從酒神到超人.香港=Hong Kong, China:中華=Chung Hwa.
49. 鈴木大拙, D. T.,林宏濤（譯）, H.-T.(Trans.)(2009).禪學入門.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:商周=Business Weekly.
50. 鈴木大拙, D. T.,林暉鈞（譯）, H.-T.(Trans.)(2018).禪與日本文化.新北市=New Taipei, Taiwan:遠足文化=Walkers Cultural.
51. 劉一民, I.-M.(1991)。運動身體經驗探源─主體性與創造性經驗的反省。體育學報，13，53-61。
52. 劉真（編）, J.(Ed.)(2000).教育大辭書.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:文景=Winjoin.
53. 劉貴傑, K.-C.(2013).禪宗哲學.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press.