幼保系學生的家庭經濟、生活風格與其學校表現之相關研究

The Relationship among Family Economy, Life Style and School Performance of ECEC Department Student

10.6450/ER.200606.0023

李新民(Hsing-Ming Lee)

家庭經濟 ； 生活風格 ； 學校表現 ； family economy ； life style ； school performance

教育學刊

26期（2006 / 06 / 01）

23 - 46

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討幼保系學生的生活風格，以及家庭經濟、生活風格、學校表現之間的關聯。研究者以問卷調查台灣地區978名幼保系學生的家庭經濟基本資料，及其對生活風格、學校表現的自陳實證數據。研究者將蒐集所得實證資料進行驗證性因素分析、變異數分析以及結構方程模式分析。驗證性因素分析結果顯示幼保系學生的生活風格包含浪漫關懷、自主進取、社交時尚等類型。變異數分析結果顯示不同家庭經濟地位的學生生活風格有顯著差異，高經濟地位學生較傾向自主進取的生活風格，低經濟地位學生較傾向社交時尚的生活風格。結構方程模式分析結果顯示生活風格與學校表現之間有顯著關聯。

The main purpose of this study is to explore the relationship among family economy, life-style and school performance of ECEC(early childhood education and care) department student. A questionnaire is conducted with 978 ECEC department students for collecting data. The obtained data is analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), analysis of variance (ANOVA), and structural equation modeling (SEM). The result of CFA shows that there are three life style factors among ECEC students, including romance and caring style, self-decided and ambition style, social and fashion style. Based on ANOVA, it is found that high economic status students tend to be self-decided and ambition style, while low economic status students tend to be social and fashion style. However, structural equation modeling analysis shows that ECEC students' school performance is significantly influenced by their life-styles.

1. 楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳主編(2005)。華人本土心理學。台北:遠流。
   連結：
2. Appadurai, A.(1990).Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy.Public Culture,2(2),1-24.
3. Bourdieu, P.(1984).Distinction.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
4. Celano, M. P.,Geller, R. J.(1993).Learning, school performance, and children with asthma: how much at risk？.Journal of Learning Disability,26(1),23-32.
5. Diette, G. B.,Markson, L.,Skinner, E.,Nguyen, T.,Wu, A. W.(2000).Nocturnal asthma in children affects school attendance, school performance, and parent's work attendance.Archivement Pediatric Adolesence Medience,154(9),923-928.
6. Hawkins, I.,Best, R. J.,Coney, K. A.(1998).Consumer behavior: Building marketing strategy.New York:Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
7. Kamerman, S. B.(2000).Early childhood education and care: An overview of developments in the OECD countries.International Journal of Educational research,33(1),7-29.
8. Krejcie, R.V.,Morgan, P. W.(1970).Determing sample size for research activities.Educational and Psychological Measurement,30,607-610.
9. Lee, J.(1999).The positive of mentoring economically disadvantaged students.Professional School Counseling,2(3),172-179.
10. Plummer, J. T.(1974).The concept and application of life style segmentation.Journal of Marketing,38,33-37.
11. Poulantzas, N.(1979).Classes in contemporary capitalism.London:NLB.
12. Schludermann, S.,Schludermann, E.,Huynh, C-L.(1996).Family background, adolescent coping styles, and adjustment.ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
13. Scott, W. A.,Scott, R.,McCabe, M.(1991).Family relationships and children personality: A cross-culture, cross-source comparision.British.Journal of Social Psychology,30,1-20.
14. Usher, R.,Edward, R.(1996).Postermodernism and education.London:Routledge.
15. Wells, W. D.(1974).Life style and psychographics.Chicago:American Marketing Association.
16. Wells, W.,Tigert, D.(1971).Activities, interests and opinions.Journal of Advertising Research,11,27-35.
17. Willis, P.(1977).Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs.New York:Columbia University.
18. 余安邦、楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳主編(2005)。華人本土心理學。台北:遠流。
19. 李新民、張翠娥(2004)。國科會專題研究計劃報告國科會專題研究計劃報告,未出版
20. 林生傳(2000)。教育社會學。台北:巨流。
21. 孫治本(2001)。疆界毀壞與生活風格。當代，168，26-39。
22. 翁克成(2004)。台北縣，輔仁大學心理學系。
23. 張嘉莉(2004)。宜蘭縣，佛光人文社會學院心理學研究所。
24. 陳嘉皇(2002)。布爾迪厄的生活風格理論對九年一貫課程「藝術與人文」學習領域實施之啓示。教育研究，10，239-247。
25. 黃保勝(1997)。台中市，國立台中師範學院國教育研究所。
26. 黃瑞祺(2003)。現代性後現代性全球化。台北:左岸。
27. 楊國樞主編、余安邦、葉明華(1991)。華人心理的本土化研究。台北:桂冠。
28. 趙富年(1980)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
29. 劉維公(2001)。何謂生活風格－論生活風格的社會理論意涵。當代，168，10-25。