科展績優教師創意思考教學模式之建構－以國小自然科“太陽的運行”為例

The Development of Creative Thinking Instruction Model by ScienceFair Awarded Teachers: Taking "The Motion of the Sun" as an Example

10.6450/ER.200706.0137

鄭英耀(Ying-Yao Cheng)；劉昆夏(Kun-Shia Liu)

創意思考教學 ； 教材開發 ； 知識分享 ； 自然科 ； 創造性問題解決 ； creative thinking instruction ； teaching material development ； knowledge sharing ； science subject ； creative problem solving

教育學刊

28期（2007 / 06 / 01）

137 - 168

繁體中文

本研究旨在邀集具備豐富教學經驗的科展績優教師，建構一套適合推廣的創意思考教學模式及教材。教材開發成員包括七位國小自然科教師，平均教學年資20年，其中有五位教師曾榮獲五次以上之高雄市國中小科展第一名，而且七位教師之中有三位是國小教科書的撰述委員，兼具專業的教材開發能力。教材之開發歷程，首先由團隊成員透過定期的聚會討論與專業分享，建構適用於國小自然科的創意思考教學模式。其次，再依據所建構之模式，以「太陽的運行」為單元主題，設計一套適用於九年一貫課程的教案，提供國小教師教學上的參考。結果發現：科展績優教師團隊經過17次的討論與共識建立，依據創造性問題解決(creative problem solving)模式、科學探究(scientific inquiry)教學以及STS(Science/Technology/Society)教學的理念，將創意思考教學模式(Creative Thinking Instruction Model, CTIM)劃分為「教師的創意」與「學生的創意」兩大部分，包含「設計情境」、「發現問題」、「提出假設」、「設計驗證」、「解釋結果」以及「推廣應用」六個步驟。以「太陽的運行」為單元主題所設計的教案，不僅符合九年一貫自然與生活科技學習領域的能力指標，亦與坊間各版本教科書的主題相呼應，有利於教育現場實務教學之運用。

The main purpose of this study was to develop creative thinking instruction model and teaching material of science. Seven science fair awarded teachers with average 20 years of working experience were recruited as a team. Among them, five were awarded science fair champions more than five times in Kaohsiung city, and three were writing committee members of science textbooks. The study consisted of two stages. In the first stage, an appropriate Creative Thinking Instruction Model (CTIM) was constructed through panel discussion and shared teaching expertise. In the second stage, the teaching material of ”The Motion of the Sun” was developed on the basis of the constructed CTIM. The results indicate that: 1) a general consensus is reached by the team members through 17 panel discussions, and the essentials of creative problem solving model, scientific inquiry approach and STS (Science/Technology/Society) approach are combined on the basis of CTIM, which then is classified into ”creativity of the teachers” and ”creativity of the pupils”, which are further differentiated into a six-step instruction loop: situation designing, problem finding, hypothesis proposing, testing designing, results explaining, and application promoting/2) The teaching material of ”The Motion of the Sun” not only meets the competence indicators of science and life technology learning area in the Grade 1-9 Curriculum, but also is in accordance with the subjects of most commercial science textbooks. It can be applied to current science teaching and to promoting creativity education.

1. 吳坤璋、吳裕益、黃台珠(2005)。科學探究能力測驗的編製與信、效度考驗。測驗學刊，52(2)，119-148。
   連結：
2. 鄭英耀、王文中(2002)。影響科學競賽績優教師創意行為之因素。應用心理研究，15，163-189。
   連結：
3. Anderson, D. R.(2002).Creative teachers: Risk, responsibility, and love.Journal of Education,183(1),33-48.
4. Barell, J.(2003).Developing more curious minds
5. Barell, J.,A. L. Costa(1991).Reflective teaching for thoughtfulness.Developing minds: A resourse book for teaching thinking,207-210.
6. Bibens, R. F.(2001).Using inquiry effectively.Theory into Practice,19(2),87-92.
7. Brooking, A.(1999).Corporate memory: strategies for knowledge management
8. Christie, K.,Kaminski, K.(2002).Creative problem solving at the United Way.Communique,13,8-11.
9. Coil, R. K.(2005).The role of models and analogies in science education: implications from research.International Journal of Science Education,27(2),183-198.
10. Costa, A. L.(1991).Development minds: A resource book for teaching thinking
11. Freeman, T.,Wolfe, P.,Littlejohn, B.,Mayfield, N.(2001).Measuring success: Survey shows CPS impacts Indiana.Communique,12,1-6.
12. Harris, D. G.,Blank, S. S.(1983).A comparative study: Two approaches to enhance creative problem-solving in grade five students.B. C. Journal of Special Education,7(2),129-152.
13. Hartman, H. J.,H. J, Hartman(2001).Developing students` metacognitive knowledge and skill.Metacognition in learning and instruction,33-68.
14. Hartman, H. J.,H. J. Hartman(2001).Metacognition in science teaching and learning.Metacognition in learning and instruction,173-201.
15. Hendriks, P.(1999).Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge sharing.Knowledge and Process Management,6(2),91-100.
16. Hoover, S. M.(1994).Scientific problem finding in gifted fifth-grade students.Roeper Review,16(3),154-159.
17. Houtz, J. C.,C. Hedley,J. Houtz,A. Baratta(1990).Environments that support creative thinking.Cognition, Curriculum and Literacy
18. Howe, R.(1996).Instruction and Experience for abilities related to creative processes and products.Journal of Creative Behavior,30,156-178.
19. Isaksen, S. G.,Dorval, K. B.(1993).Changing views of CPS: Over 40 years of continuous improvement.International Creativity Network,3,1-5.
20. Isaksen, S. G.,Dorval, K. B.,Treffinger, D. J.(2000).Creative approaches to problem solving
21. Isaksen, S. G.,Treffinger, D. J.(1985).Creative problem solving: The basic course
22. Isakseu, S. G.,Treffinger, D. J.(2004).Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving.Journal of Creative Behavior,38(2),75-101.
23. James, P. T. F.(2000).Fostering creativity education.Education,120(1),744-757.
24. Johnson, D.(2002).Everyday practice in problem-solving.Library Talk,15(1),64.
25. Joyce, B.,Weil, M.(1986).Models of teaching
26. Maker, C. J.(1982).Curriculum development for the gifted
27. National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and the national science education standards
28. National Research Council(1996).The national science education standards
29. Nonaka, I.,Takeuchi, H.(1995).The Knowledge-Creating Company.Oxford University Press
30. Palincsar, A. S.,Magnusson, S. J.,Vincent, M.(2002).supporting guided-inquiry instruction.Teaching exceptional children,34(3),88-91.
31. Peterson, R. E.(2002).Establishing the creative environment in technology education.Technology Teacher,61(4),7-10.
32. Richetti, C.,Sheerin, J.(1999).Helping student ask the right questions.Educational Leadership,57(3),58-62.
33. Rose, L. H.,Lin, H. T.(1984).A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs.Journal of Creative Behavior,18(1),11-22.
34. Scott, G.,Leritz, L. E.,Mumford, M. D.(2004).The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review.Creativity Research Journal,16(4),361-388.
35. Sternberg, R. J.(2003).Creative thinking in the classroom.Scandinavian Journal of educational Research,47(3),325-338.
36. Sternberg, R. J.(2000).Identifying and developing creativity giftedness.Roper Review,23(2),60-64.
37. Torrance, E. P.,M. Wittrock(1986).Teaching creative and gifted learners.Handbook of research on teaching,630-647.
38. Yager, R. E.(1996).Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education
39. 吳靜吉、林偉文、林士郁、陳秋秀、曾敬梅、王涵儀(2002)。教育部創造力教育政策白皮書子計畫（六）國際創造力教育發展趨勢專案。
40. 呂素雯(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文。
41. 施乃華(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化市，彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文。
42. 洪文東(2001)。國小自然科學創造思考教學模組設計與評估。九十學年度師範學院教育學術論文集，台中:
43. 洪振方(2003)。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報，15，641-662。
44. 夏侯欣鵬(2000)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
45. 孫仲山(1996)。師生互動的教學理論。高市文教，57，38-41。
46. 徐蓓蓓(1983)。教師個人特質、師生口語互動與學生對教師行為知覺、學生學業成就之關係研究。教育心理學報，16，99-114。
47. 張振松(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，台北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文。
48. 教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書
49. 教育部(2004)。科學教育白皮書
50. 教育部(2000)。國民教育九年一實課程暫行綱要一「自然與生活科技學習領域」課程綱要
51. 教育部(2004)。2005-2008教育施政主軸
52. 陳琇玲、T. M.、Koulopoulos、Frappaolo(2001)。知識管理
53. 黃萬居(2002)。由教學原理論述STS教學活動之應用。科學教育研究與發展，59-83。
54. 鄭英耀、王文中(2003)。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC-91-2522-S-110-003國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC-91-2522-S-110-003,未出版
55. 鄭英耀、李育嘉(2003)。國小自然科教學行為之差異分析：科展績優教師與一般教師之比較。2003創造力實踐歷程研討會，台北:
56. 鄭英耀、張川木、王文中(2002)。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC90-2511-S-110-005)國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC90-2511-S-110-005),高雄市:國立中山大學教育研究所。
57. 蘇育任(2001)。運用STS理念設計九年一貫自然與生活科技統整課程之研究。九十學年度師範學院教育學術論文集，台中:

1. 黃義良,王怡又(2019)。提升三創類通識課程學習成效之教學歷程探討－以「生活創意發想與實作」為例。大學教學實務與研究學刊，3(1)，1-38。
2. 邱珍琬(2014)。大學生眼中的創意教學。教育學誌，32，153-184。
3. 鄭英耀、何曉琪、王佳琪(2014)。「科學創造性問題解決測驗」之發展。測驗學刊，61(3)，337-360。