题名

生態公民意識之倫理學分析－在恐懼、效益性與詩性想像之間

并列篇名

An Analysis of Ethical Condition of Eco-Citizenship Consciousness: Among Fear, Utility, and Poetic Imagination

DOI

10.6450/ER.200912.0203

作者

王俊斌(Chun-Ping Wang)；涂真瑜(Chen-Yu Tu)

关键词

永續性 ； 生態公民資質 ； 效益 ； 詩性想像 ； 灌輸 ； sustainability ； eco-citizenship ； utility ； poetic imagination ； indoctrination

期刊名称

教育學刊

卷期/出版年月

33期（2009 / 12 / 01）

页次

203 - 233

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文目的係運用倫理學概念，分析實踐生態倫理的可能命題，並且將之轉化為三種思考生態問題或環境教育的不同倫理學立場，包括「立場A：恐懼感與生態共同責任」、「立場B：效益性與人類福祉」，以及「立場C：詩性想像與積極生態公民意識」等三種不同立場。就此三者的差異而言，研究者認為不論是恐懼感、效益性或者詩性想像，它們對永續發展之倫理學分析，各自有其不同切入角度與論證的有效性。最後，本文也指出，「立場C」藉由文學、藝術、電影等文本，所提供的豐富詩性想像來涵養永續意識，並據此培養真有生態素養的積極生態公民，是落實永續教育值得嘗試的可行途徑。
英文摘要

This article aims to analyze three eco-ethical propositions. In order to do so, those propositions are transformed into three ethical conditions in relation to ecological issues and environmental education. They are Condition A: Fear and Co-responsibility, Condition B: Utility and Human Happiness, and Condition C: Poetic Imagination and Positive Eco-citizenship. Each of them is involved in particular standpoint and demonstrates valid argumentation respectively. The authors suggest that Condition C may be a better way for sustainable education. It can be put into practice by offering texts of literature, art or movies to enrich students' poetic imaginations and thus to cultivate citizens' ecological literacy.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王順美(2004)。社會變遷下的環境教育。師大學報：科學教育類，49(1)，59-170。
    連結：
  2. Transforming environmental education: Making the cultural and environmental commons the focus of educational reform
  3. Brandt, R. B.(1959).Ethical theory: the problems of normative and critical ethics.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  4. Can, D.(2005).On the contribution of literature and the arts to the educational cultivation of moral virtue, feeling and emotion.Journal of Moral Education,34(2),137-151.
  5. Carr, D.(2004).Moral values and the arts in environmental education: Towards an ethics of aesthetic appreciation.Journal of Philosophy of Education,38(2),221-239.
  6. Crichton, M.(2004).State of fear.New York:Avon Books.
  7. Davis, Mike(1998).Ecology of fear: Los Angeles and the imagination of disaster.New York:Metropolitan Books.
  8. Dickens, C.(2001).Hard times.New York:Dover.
  9. Habermas, J.(1984).The theory of communication action, vol 1: Reason and the rationalization of society.Cambridge, MA:Polity Press.
  10. Hargrove, E. C.(1989).Foundations of environmental ethics.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  11. Johnson, P.(2004).Moral philosophers and the novel.Hampshire:Palgrave MacMillan.
  12. Marshall, T. H.(1977).Citizenship and social class.Chicago:Chicago University.
  13. Maxwell, B.(2006).Naturalized compassion: A critique of Nussbaum on literature as education for compassionate citizenry.Journal of Moral Education,35(3),335-352.
  14. Mill, J. S.(1998).Utilitarianism.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  15. Nash, R. F.(1989).The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics.Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press.
  16. Nussbaum, M. C.(1995).Poetic justice: The literary, imagination and public life.Boston:Beacon Press.
  17. Nussbaum, M. C.(2006).Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership.Cambridge, MA:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  18. Nussbaum, M. C.(1997).Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education.Cambridge, MA:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  19. Nussbaum, M. C.(1996).For a love of country? In a new democracy forum on the limits of patriotism.Boston:Beacon Press.
  20. Orr, D.(1992).Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world Albany.NY:State University of New York Press.
  21. Rawls, J.(1971).A theory of justice.Cambridge, MA:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  22. Sen, A. K.(1987).On ethics and economics.Maiden, MA:Blackwell.
  23. Singer, P.(2002).One world.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
  24. Smart, J. J. C. S.(1953).Extreme and restricted utilitarianism.Philosophical Quarterly,6,344-354.
  25. Smart, J. J. C. S.,J. J. C. Smart (Eds.),B. Williams (Eds.)(1973).Utilitarianism: For and against.Now York:Cambridge University Press.
  26. Steenbergen, B. van (Ed.)(1994).The condition of citizenship.London:SAGE.
  27. Williams, B. (Eds.),J. J. C. Smart (Eds.)(1973).Utilitarianism: For and against.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  28. 王俊秀(1999)。全球變遷與變遷全球―環境社會學的視野。臺北市:巨流。
  29. 王俊斌(2008)。論C. A. Bowers的生態正義教學論及其可能性：在經濟全球化與「Cultural Commons」之間。「第八屆當代教育哲學」學術研討會，臺北市:
  30. 但昭偉(2000)。多元文化主義觀點之下的道德教育與評量：一項初步的觀察。教育資料集刊，25，225-242。
  31. 邱德亮、黃宏昭譯、J. Baudrillard著(2006)。恐怖主義的精靈(The spirit of terrorism baudrillard)。臺北市:麥田。
  32. 涂真瑜(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立師範學院視覺藝術研究所。
  33. 郭實渝(2008)。環境保護與經濟發展之間－生能文化教育的角色。「第八屆當代教育哲學」學術研討會，臺北市:
  34. 郭實渝(2006)。以「永續」為教育終目標的探討。「第七屆當代教育哲學」學術研討會，臺北市:
  35. 郭實渝(2006)。探討在保護生態文化與資本主義的永續概念。「2006年中華民國環境教育」研討會，臺中市:
  36. 郭實渝主編(1997)。當代教育哲學論文集Ⅱ。臺北市:中央研究院歐美研究所。
  37. 馮朝霖(2000)。教育哲學專論―主體、情性與創化。臺北市:元照。
  38. 廖世德譯、J. Krishnamurti著(1995)。自然與生態(On nature and environment)。臺北市:方智。
  39. 歐陽教(1985)。德育原理。臺北市:文景。
  40. 歐陽教(1973)。教學哲學導論。臺北市:文景。
被引用次数
  1. (2020).Ideas, Practices, Criticisms, and Implications of MOOCs as a New Path for Eco-Friendly Pedagogy.教育學刊,55,119-161.
print cancel