國小解題運作記憶表現作業之編製發展與實測分析研究

The Development and Testing of a Working Memory Performance Task in Mathematical Problem Solving for First Graders

10.6450/ER.201006.0143

許家驊(Chia-Hua Hsu)

運作記憶 ； 運作記憶表現作業 ； 解題 ； 解題運作記憶評量 ； 解題學習歷程 ； working memory (WM) ； working memory performance task ； mathematical problem solving (MPS) ； assessment of WM in MPS ； learning process in MPS

教育學刊

34期（2010 / 06 / 01）

143 - 177

繁體中文

本研究旨在參照解題運作記憶功能（訊息保留及即時處理）分析，爾後搭配學習內容分析，編製解題運作記憶表現作業。採合目標與叢集取樣，抽取嘉義縣市一年級學生施測後進行各統計分析。在效度分析方面，試探性及驗證性因素分析均發現作業的二因子結構（訊息保留及即時處理），且共同向度性、因素萃取、抽取變異比及模式適配度均屬良好，並具良好之效標關聯及預測效度。在信度分析方面，內部一致性係數及組合信度亦屬良好。在區別力分析方面，極端組t考驗結果良好。對不同性別及數學學業成就學生之實測結果發現，二者在兩項能力上均具真正差異。

This study used functional and learning content analysis to develop and test a working memory performance task (WMPT) in mathematical problem solving. The subjects were first graders from Chiayi who were chosen by purposeful and cluster sampling. All subjects were tested with the WMPT, then analyzed by statistical methods. First, the adequate internal consistency coefficient and composite reliability were verified. Second, the results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) yielded two factors: information preservation and simultaneous processing. Third, the adequate critical ratios were found for single item tasks, sub-tasks and whole tasks. Finally, performances on the WMPT in mathematical problem solving showed significant differences, especially as a function of students' gender and level of academic achievement in mathematics.

1. 陳密桃、李新民、黃秀霜(2007)。臺灣地區國民小學教師實用智能、情緒智能與專業表現之相關研究。教育心理學報，39(2)，295-316。
   連結：
2. Andersson, U.(2007).The contribution of working memory to children's mathematical word problem solving.Applied Cognitive Psychology,21(9),1201-1216.
3. Baddeley, A. D.(1996).Exploring the central executive.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49(1),5-28.
4. Belsley, D. A.,Kuh, E.,Welsch, R. E.(1980).Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity.New York:John Wiley.
5. Byrne, B. M.(2001).Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Crocker, L.,Aligina, J.(1986).Introduction to classical and modern test theory.Orlando, FL:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
7. Dehn, M. J.(2008).Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
8. Desoete, A.,Roeyers, H.(2005).Cognitive skills in mathematical problem solving in grade 3.British Journal of Educational Psychology,75,119-138.
9. Hair, J. F.(2006).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall.
10. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,39,31-36.
11. Kaiser, H. F.(1960).The application of electronic computers to factor analysis.Psychometrika Educational and Psychological Measurement,20,141-151.
12. Lester, F. K.(ed.)(2007).Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics.Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
13. Marcoulides, G. A.(ed.),Schumacker, R. E.(ed.)(2001).New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Montague, M.,Warger, C.,Morgan, T. H.(2000).Solve it! Strategy instruction to improve mathematical problem solving.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,15(2),110-116.
15. Pickering, S. J.(2006).Working memory and education.Amsterdam:Academic Press.
16. Schurter, W. A.(2002).Comprehension monitoring: An aid to mathematical problem solving.Journal of Developmental Education,26(2),22-33.
17. Swanson, H. L.(2006).Cross-sectional and incremental changes in working memory and mathematical problem solving.Journal of Educational Psychology,98(2),265-281.
18. Swanson, H. L.(2004).Working memory and phonological processing as predictors of children's mathematical problem solving at different ages.Memory & Cognition,32(4),648-661.
19. Swanson, H. L.,Margaret, B. F.(2004).The relationship between working memory and in children at risks and not at risks for serious math difficulties.Journal of Educational Psychology,96(3),471-491.
20. 王保進(2004)。多變量分析—套裝程式與資料分析。臺北市:五南。
21. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。
22. 李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。臺北市:心理。
23. 林清山(1991)。多變項分析統計法。臺北市:東華。
24. 林進材(2003)。教學原理。臺北市:五南。
25. 邱皓政(2001)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南。
26. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北市:雙葉。
27. 張英傑主編(2007)。國小數學課本（第二冊）。臺南市:南一。
28. 許家驊(2008)。國小數學解題自我調節表現量表之編製發展與實測分析研究。教育與心理研究，31(4)，115-146。
29. 許瑛珍主編(2007)。國小數學課本（第二冊）。臺南市:翰林。
30. 許瑛珍主編(2006)。國小數學課本（第一冊）。臺南市:翰林。
31. 陳冒海主編(2006)。國小數學課本（第一冊）。臺南市:南一。
32. 楊瑞智主編(2007)。國小數學課本（第二冊）。臺北市:康軒。
33. 楊瑞智主編(2006)。國小數學課本（第一冊）。臺北市:康軒。
34. 鄭國順主編(2007)。國小數學課本（第二冊）。臺北縣:國立教育研究院籌備處。
35. 鄭國順主編(2006)。國小數學課本（第一冊）。臺北縣:國立教育研究院籌備處。

1. 許家驊(2011)。歷程導向設計及學習策略中介教導對個體不同層次數學解題學習潛能開展效益影響之動態評量研究。教育心理學報，43(1)，127-154。
2. (2010)。國小學生運作記憶、自我調節表現與數學解題能力關係之研究。教育研究學報，44(2)，55-84。