Socio-Emotional Issues of Mathematically Gifted Adolescent Females: Portraits of Two Cases in Taiwan

女性數學資優青少年的社會情緒問題之探究

10.6457/BSER.200812.0091

高振耀(Chen-Yao Kao)

數學資優 ； 青春期 ； 性別刻板印象 ； 以價值觀為基礎的諮商 ； cally gifted ； Adolescence ； Gender stereotypes ； Values-Based counseling

特殊教育與復健學報

19期（2008 / 12 / 01）

91 - 111

英文

有關女性數學資優青少年之社會情緒問題的研究一向很少，更遑論針對亞洲女性數學資優青少年之社會情緒問題的研究。本研究嘗試從國際的角度探討兩位台灣女性數學資優青少年之社會情緒問題。為了清楚瞭解這兩位女性所面臨的問題，這份文章選擇包含有深度訪談、文件審查以及觀察的質性研究方法。研究發現被拿來與國際發表的相關文獻作比較，並呈現出若干符合或不符合先前研究之處。符合先前研究之處有兩位女同學的經驗，讓我們可以更徹底的瞭解資賦優異的概念。

There has been a paucity of research addressing the socio-emotional issues of mathematically gifted adolescent females, let alone those of mathematically gifted Asian adolescent females. This research study tried to investigate the socio-emotional issues of two mathematically gifted adolescent females living in Taiwan from an international perspective. To clearly understand the issues facing these gifted young women, a qualitative research design was chosen that involved in-depth interviews, document review, and observation. The findings were compared with internationally published literature, and some consistencies and inconsistencies were uncovered. The themes consistent with internationally published literature are limited career choices, identification with their father, manifestation of emotional overexcitability, and lack of experiences in playing with three-dimensional toys. The themes inconsistent with internationally published literature are preference for co-ed classes, positive attitude toward exams, and indifference to extracurricular activities and social issues. The inconsistencies provided an opportunity to contemplate the socio-emotional issues of mathematically gifted adolescent females from new angles. Besides, examining the socio-emotional issues manifested by the stories of these two gifted Asian females enables us to understand the concept of giftedness more thoroughly.

1. Bogdan, R. C.,Biklen, S. K.(2007).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
2. Brody, L. E.,L. H. Fox,L. Brody,D. Tobin (Eds.)(1980).Women and the mathematical mystique.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
3. Charmaz, K.,N. K. Denzin,Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.)(2005).The Sage handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
4. Creswell, J. W.(2005).Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education.
5. Csikszentmihalyi, M.,Rathunde, K.,Whalen, S.(1993).Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
6. Davis, G. A.,Rimm, S. B.(2004).Education of the gifted and talented.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
7. Gallagher, J. J.(1985).Teaching the gifted child.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
8. Gumbiner, J.(2003).Adolescent assessment.Hoboken, NJ:Wiley & Sons.
9. Hollinger, C. L.(1983).Counseling the gifted and talented female adolescent: The relationship between social self-esteem and traits of instrumentality and expressiveness.Gifted Child Quarterly,27,157-161.
10. Horner, M. S.(1972).Toward an understanding of achievement related conflicts in women.Journal of Social Issues,28,155-175.
11. Huberman, A. M.,Miles, M.B.,N. K. Denzin,Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.)(1994).The handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
12. Kao, C.,Hébert, T. P.(2006).Gifted Asian American adolescent males: Portraits of cultural dilemmas.Journal for the education of the gifted,30(1),88-117.
13. Kelly, K.,Hall, A.,N. Colangelo,S. Assouline,D. L. Ambroson.(1994).Talent development.Dayton, OH:Ohio Psychology Press.
14. Kerr, B.,N. Colangelo,G. A. Davis (Eds.)(1997).Handbook of gifted education.Boston, MA:Ally & Bacon.
15. Kerr, B.,Robinson Kurpius, S. E.(2004).Encouraging talented girls in math and science: effects of a guidance intervention.High ability studies,15(1),85-102.
16. Kerr, B.,Sodano, S.(2003).Career assessment with intellectual gifted students.Journal of Career Assessment,11(2),168-186.
17. Lubinski, D.,Benbow, C. P.,Morelock, M. J.,K. A. Heller,F. J. MÖnk,R. J. Sternberg,R. F. Subtnik (Eds.)(2000).International handbook of giftedness and Talent.Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
18. Nugent, S. A.,F. A. Karnes,S. M. Bean (Eds.)(2005).Methods and materials for teaching the gifted.Waco, Texas:Prufrock.
19. Papalia, D. E.,Olds, S. W.,Feldman, R. D.(2004).Human development.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
20. Piechowski, M. M.,N. Colangelo,G. A. Davis (Eds.)(1991).Handbook of gifted education.Boston, MA:Ally & Bacon.
21. Piechowski, M. M.,N. Colangelo,G. A. Davis (Eds.)(1997).Handbook of gifted education.Boston, MA:Ally & Bacon.
22. Reis, S. M.,Park, S.(2001).Gender differences in high-achieving students in math and science.Journal for the education of the gifted,25(1),52-73.
23. Reis, S. M.,Renzulli, J. S.(2004).Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities.Psychology in the schools,41(1),119-130.
24. Reis, S. M.,Small, M. A.,F. A. Karnes,S. M. Bean (Eds.)(2005).Methods and materials for teaching the gifted.Waco, Texas:Prufrock.
25. Rimm, S.,Rimm-Kaufman, S.(2001).How Jane won: 55 successful women share how they grew from ordinary girls to extraordinary women.New York:Crown.
26. Sadker, M.,Sadker, D.(1994).Failing at fairness: How America`s schools cheat girls.New York:Scribners & Sons.
27. Schuler, P. A.(2000).Perfectionism and the gifted adolescent.Journal of secondary gifted education,11(4),183-196.
28. Starko, A. J.(2005).Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Wu, W. T.(2000).Talent identification and development in Taiwan.Roeper Review,21(5),131-134.
30. Wu, W.,Cho, S.,Munandar, U.,K. A. Heller,F. J. MÖnk,R. J. Sternberg,R. F. Subtnik (Eds.)(2000).International handbook of giftedness and Talent.Oxford, UK:Elsevier.

1. 高振耀,宋玉英(2019)。探索五位理工科女性世界中的創造力：她們對創造力的詮釋以及理工背景對其創造力的影響。教育科學研究期刊，64(3)，55-84。
2. (2017)。美國進階安置及其對臺灣資優教育之啟示。教育政策論壇，20(1)，1-34。