题名

當我們同在一起:重度及多重障礙學生家長參與班級義工活動之個案研究

并列篇名

Involving Classroom Voluntary Activities: A Case of Perspectives from Parents of Students with Severe and Multiple Disabilities

DOI

10.6457/BSER.200912.0075

作者

黃志雄(Chih-Hsiung Huang)

关键词

個案研究 ; 班級義工活動 ; 家長參與 ; 重度及多重障礙 ; case study ; classroom voluntary activities ; parent involvement ; severe and multiple disabilities

期刊名称

特殊教育與復健學報

卷期/出版年月

21期(2009 / 12 / 01)

页次

75 - 97

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在瞭解重度及多重障礙學生家長參與班級義工活動的覺知歷程,透過個案研究方式,探討重度及多重障礙學生家長對家長參與的覺知,以及參與班級義工活動的歷程,並分析家長參與班級義工活動對親師關係與學生的影響。研究對象為一重度及多重障礙班級中的13位學生、14位家長和2名老師,資料的蒐集包括深度訪談、參與觀察、檔案資料和研究日誌,以開放編碼和主軸編碼進行資料分析,並透過三角驗證、參與者驗證和同儕驗證來增進研究的信、效度。 研究結果發現: 1.參與研究之重度及多重障礙學生家長,普遍地認同班級義工活動和家長參與。 2.影響家長參與班級義工活動的因素包括工作、家庭、孩子的特殊需求、家長個人身體狀況和使命感、老師的接納態度以及學生的反應。 3.班級義工活動對家長的影響包括:調整對孩子的教養態度、調整自我的心情、學習與孩子互動的方法、以及促進自我期許等,顯示班級義工活動達到促進家長的增權賦能。 4.班級義工活動能夠促進親師合作,同時也提供老師更多的人力支援,和促進教師的自我督促與期許。 5.家長參與義工活動對親子互動有正向的影響,同時亦有助於學生的學校學習,特別是在生活自理能力的類化和學習意願,以及功能性學科的個別學習。

英文摘要

The purposes of this study were to understand parents' awareness and progress of involving voluntary activities in their children's classroom. A case study was applied to find out the effects among teachers, parents, and students relationships through the participation and voluntary activities. A class of children with severe disabilities was the subject of this study, included 13 students, 14 parents and 2 teachers. The data were collected with in-depth interview, participated-observation, documents, and research diary. The open coding and axial coding were used to analyze the data collected, and the triangulation, member checks, and peer examination were used to promote the reliability and validity. The major findings of this study were: 1. Parents who have children with severe disabilities assented to voluntary activities. 2. The factors affected the parents participations including jobs, family, children's special needs, parents' health conditions and responsibilities, the teachers' attitudes to accept voluntary activities, and students' respondence. 3. The effects of voluntary activities on parents included: to adjust their educational strategies and attitudes toward their child, to adjust their mood, to learn how to interact with their kids, and to promote self-expectation. It also indicated that involving classroom voluntary activities can increase parents acquiring support and empowerment. 4. Classroom voluntary activities can also advance the cooperation between teachers and parents. It also provided more human resources to assist and supervise teachers. 5. Parents as volunteers have interaction positive effects of parents and kids, and also help children with severe disabilities to learn in school, especially, to generalize the daily living skills, to raise learning motivation, and to improve individual learning in functional academics.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 醫藥總論
社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Ballantine, J. H.(1999).Getting involved in our children's education.Childhood Education,75(3),170-171.
  2. Bronfenbrenner, U.(1979).The ecology of human development.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  3. Carter, S.(2002).The impact of parent/family involvement of student outcomes: An annotated bibliography of research from the past decade.Eugene, OR:Consortium for appropriate Dispute in Special Education.
  4. Decker, L. E.,Decker, V. A.(2003).Home, school, and community partnerships.Lanham, MA:Scarecrow.
  5. Eichinger, J.(2000).Job stress and satisfaction among special education teachers: Effects of gender and social role orientation.International Journal of Disability, Development & Education,47(4),397-412.
  6. Epstein, J. L.(2001).School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving school.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
  7. Epstein, J. L.,Coates, L.,Salinas, K. C.,Sanders, M. G.,Simon, B. S.(1997).School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
  8. Epstein, J. L.,Dauber, S. L.(1991).School programs and teacher practices of parent involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools.The Elementary School Journal,91(3),289-305.
  9. Fan, X. T.,Chen, M.(2001).Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis.Educational Psychology Review,13,1-22.
  10. Fantuzzo, J.,Tighe, E.,Childs, S.(2000).Family involvement and questionnaire: A multivariate assessment of family participation in early childhood education.Journal of Educational Psychology,92,367-376.
  11. Gestwicki, C.(2000).Home, school, and community relations: A guide to working with families.Albany, NY:Thomson Learning.
  12. Heller, T.,Miller, A. B.,Hsieh, K.(1999).Impact of consumer-directed family support program on adults with developmental disabilities and their family caregivers.Family Relations,48(4),419-427.
  13. Henderson, A. T.(1987).The evidence continues to grow: Parent involvement improves students achievement.Columbia, MD:National Committee for Citizen in Education.
  14. Hooste, A. V.,Maes, B.(2003).Family factors in the early development of children with Down Syndrome.Journal of Early Intervention,25(4),296-309.
  15. Hornby, G.(2000).Improving parental involvement.New York, NY:Cassell.
  16. Kaiser, A. P.,Hancock, T. B.,Nietfeld, J. P.(2000).The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism.Early Education and Development,11(4),423-446.
  17. Kasahara, M.,Turnbull, A. P.(2005).Meaning of family-professional partnerships: Japanese mothers' perspectives.Exceptional Children,71(3),249-265.
  18. LeBlans, P.,L. Kaplan (Ed.)(1993).Education and family.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  19. Manalo, V.,Meezan, W.(2000).Toward building a typology for the evaluation of services in family support programs.Child Welfare,79(4),405-429.
  20. McKenry, P. C.,Price, S. J.(2000).Families & change: Coping with stressful events and transitions.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  21. Merriam, S. B.(1998).Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco, CA:John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Peterson, R. L.,Skiba, R.(2001).Creating school climates that prevent school violence.Clearing House,74(3),155-163.
  23. Petr, C. G.(2003).Building family-school partnerships to improve student outcomes: A primer for educators.Lanham, MA:Scarecrow.
  24. Proter DeCusati, C. L.,Johnson, J. E.(2004).Parents as classroom volunteers and kindergarten students' emergent reading skills.Journal of Educational Research,97(5),235-246.
  25. Rockwell, R. E.,Andre, L. C.,Hawley, M. K.(1996).Parents and teachers as partners issues and challenges.Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt Brace College.
  26. Singer, G. H.,Irvin, L. K.,L. H. Meyer (Eds.),C. A. Peck (Eds.),L. Brown (Eds.)(1991).Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities.Baltimore, MD:Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co..
  27. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1998).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  28. Turnbull, A. P.,Turnbull, H. R.(2001).Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Collaborating for empowerment.Columbus, OH:Merrill Prentice Hall.
  29. Turnbull, A. P.,Turnbull, H. R.,M. E. Snell (Eds.),F. Brown (Eds.)(2006).Instruction of student with severe disabilities.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
  30. U.S. Department of Education.(1994).Strong families, strong schools.Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education.
  31. Executive summary of NO Child Left Behind Act of 2001
  32. Westling, D. L.,Fox, L.(2000).Teaching students with severe disabilities.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  33. Yin, R. K.(2003).Case study research: Design and methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  34. Ysseldyke, J. E.,Algozzine, B.,Thurlow, M. L.(2000).Critical issues in special education.Boston, MA.:Houghton Mifflin Co..
  35. 王天苗(1992)。智能不足兒童與母親互動行為之追蹤。特殊教育研究學刊,8,147-174。
  36. 王天苗(1995)。心智發展障礙幼兒家庭支援實施成效及其相關問題之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,12,75-103。
  37. 行政院教育改革諮議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:教育部。
  38. 吳璧如(2003)。家庭-社區-學校之夥伴關係:理論、涵義及研究展望。教育資料與研究,52,84-91。
  39. 吳璧如(2003)。母親參與子女學校教育之研究。教育研究資訊,11(5),85-112。
  40. 吳璧如(1998)。教育歷程中家長參與學校教育之研究。國教學報,10,1-36。
  41. 周新富(2003)。家長參與子女教育之研究與實務。國民教育研究學報,11,69-92。
  42. 林明地(1999)。家長參與學校教育的研究與實際:對教育改革的啟示。教育研究資訊,7(2),61-79。
  43. 陳明聰、王天苗(1997)。台北市國小啟智班學生父母參與之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,15,215-235。
  44. 黃志雄(2003)。班級本位特殊兒童家庭支持服務的實施與發展。亞洲區障礙理解教育國際學術研討會論文集,彰化:
  45. 黃志雄(2003)。特殊兒童家庭支持與家長參與。特教園丁,19(2),8-15。
  46. 黃志雄、陳淑芬、田佳芳(2005)。特殊兒童家庭支持服務的省思:家庭需求之個案研究。轉型與發展-創造師範教育新風貌學術研討會論文集,彰化:
  47. 黃志雄、楊在珍(2002)。身心障礙兒童家庭支持的實施與成效-以班級為本位之行動研究。國立台東師範學院九十一年度特殊教育學術研討會論文集,台東:
被引用次数
  1. 蕭文翊,林秀錦(2019)。國小特教班教師教育極重度多重障礙學生之困擾與需求。特殊教育學報,50,65-91。