题名

智能障礙學生問題行為之調查研究

并列篇名

A Study of Challenging Behaviors of Students with Intellectual Disabilities

DOI

10.6457/BSER.201012.0001

作者

林惠芬(Hui-Fen Lin)

关键词

問題行為 ; 智能障礙者 ; challenging behaviors ; students with intellectual disabilities

期刊名称

特殊教育與復健學報

卷期/出版年月

23期(2010 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 23

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究係以自編之問題行為量表探討456位智能障礙學生的問題行為出現率與嚴重程度,以及是否會因不同的性別、教育階段以及障礙程度等因素的影響而有不同。量表內容計有七大行為類型,內含二十小項問題行為。問卷填寫者係該班任教的導師。 研究結果指出,智能障礙學生的問題行為出現率並不低,至少在百分之二十以上。在二十項問題行為中,「拒絕」、「擅自」和「推人」等三項的出現率是高達百分之五十以上;在七大問題行為類型中,以「反抗行為」的整體出現率最高,達54.95%。 在二十項問題行為中,僅有「膽怯」行為的嚴重性較低,其餘的行為均屬嚴重;在七大問題行為類型中,以「怪異行為」的平均得分最高,為4.64。 整體而言,相較於性別和教育階段,障礙度對於智能障礙學生問題行為的出現與嚴重性影響較大。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and seriousness of challenging behaviors of 456 students with intellectual disabilities. A self-developed questionnaire having seven types of challenging behaviors with twenty items was filled out by the special education teachers teaching in elementary and senior high schools. The results indicated that the incidence and seriousness of challenging behaviors of students with intellectual disabilities were as high as considered. Among the twenty items, the item of ”rejection of doing assignments”, ”doing things on purpose” and ”attacking classmates” respectively had the incidence of more than 50%. The ”bizarre behavior” with an average of 4.64 of a 9-Likert scale was the most serious one among the seven types of challenging behaviors. Compared with gender and grade, the severity of handicapping condition was the most important variable affecting the incidence and seriousness of challenging behaviors of students with intellectual disabilities.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 醫藥總論
社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 教育部特殊教育通報網 (2007)。各縣市身心障礙學生特教類別統計 。網址:www.set.edu.tw
  2. Coe, D. A.,Matson, J. L.,Russell, D. W.,Slifer, K. J.,Capone, G. T.,Baglio, C.(1999).Behavior problems of children of Down Syndrome and life events.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,29,149-156.
  3. Elgie, S.,Hastings, R. P.(2002).Staff definitions of challenging behavior.Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,37,202-208.
  4. Hartley, S. L.,MacLean, W. E.(2007).Staff-averse challenging behavior in older adults with intellectual disabilities.Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,20,519-528.
  5. Hastings, R. P.,Brown, T.(2002).Behavioral knowledge, causal beliefs and self-efficacy as predictors of special educator's emotional reactions to challenging behaviors.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,46,144-150.
  6. Holden, B.,Giltesen, J. P.(2006).A total population study of challenging behavior in the county of Hedmark, Norway: Prevalence, and risk markers.Research in Developmental Disabilities,27,456-465.
  7. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,30,1-14.
  8. Lowe, K.,Allen, D.,Jones, E.,Brophy, S.,Moore, K.,James, W.(2007).Challenging behaviors: Prevalence and topographies.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,51(8),625-636.
  9. Matson, J.,Rivet, T.(2007).A validity study of the Autism Spectrum Disorders-Behavior problems for adults (ASD-BPA) scale.Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,19(6),557-564.
  10. Meyer, L. H.,Evans, I. M.(1989).Nonaversive intervention for behavior problems: A manual for home and community.Baltimore, MA:Paul Brookes.
  11. Murphy, G.(2009).Challenging behavior: A barrier to inclusion?.Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,6(2),89-90.
  12. Nungesser, N. R.,Watkins, R. V.(2005).Preschool teachers' perceptions and reactions to challenging classroom behavior: Implications for speechlanguage pathologists.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,36,139-151.
  13. Oliver, C.,McClitock, K.,Hall, S.,Smith, M.,Dagnan, D.,Stenfert-Kroese, B.(2003).Assessing the severity of challenging behavior: Psychometric properties of the challenging behavior interview.Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,16,53-61.
  14. Roberston, J.,Emerson, E.,Pinkney, L.,Caesar, E.,Felec, D.,Meek, A.(2004).Quality and costs of community-based residential supports for people with mental retardation and challenging behavior.American Journal on Mental Retardation,109,332-344.
  15. Stark, J. A.(ed.),Menolascino, F. J.(ed.),Albarelli, M. H.(ed.),Gray, V. C.(ed.)(1988).Mental retardation and mental health: Classification, diagnosis, treatment, services.New York:Springer Verlag.
  16. Thompson, T.(ed.),Gray, D. B.(ed.)(1994).Destructive behavior in developmental disabilities: Diagnosis and treatment.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  17. 何華國(2003)。啟智教育研究。臺北市:五南。
  18. 吳麗婷(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。民雄鄉,國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系。
  19. 宋明君(2003)。應用功能性評量於改善工作社會技能之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,24,203-226。
  20. 林美和(1994)。智能不足研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
  21. 施顯烇(1995)。嚴重行為問題處理。臺北市:五南。
  22. 徐享良(1984)。臺灣地區中重度智能不足者適當行為之研究。教育學院學報,9,181-213。
  23. 張正芬(1999)。自閉症兒童問題行為之探討。特殊教育研究學刊,172,53-273。
  24. 教育部(2006)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。臺北市:教育部。
  25. 陳思允(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮市,國立花蓮教育大學身心障礙與輔助科技研究所。
  26. 陳榮華(1992)。智能不足研究—理論與應用。臺北市:師大書苑。
  27. 鈕文英(2009)。身心障礙者行為問題處理:正向行為支持取向。臺北市:心理。
  28. 楊碧桃(2002)。啟智班學生問題行為及管理的調查研究。屏東師院學報,16,99-134。
  29. 嚴英慈(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化市,國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡淑妃,高翊娟(2020)。班級層級介入方案對於降低國小學生健康課干擾行為之個案研究。教育研究與實踐學刊,67(2),51-67。
  2. 許思義(2017)。家有身心障礙兒:以一個智能障礙兒童的家庭為例。諮商與輔導,376,57-60。
  3. 林惠芬(2013)。特殊教育學校(班)智能障礙學生問題行為功能之調查研究。特殊教育與復健學報,28,1-16。
  4. 施婉筑、林作慶(2018)。參與地板滾球運動對智能障礙學生人際關係的影響。運動休閒餐旅研究,13(2),15-24。
  5. 魏美惠,蔡瑩萱(2016)。身心障礙兒童家長與一般兒童家長對其子女在學校與家庭生活適應情形之比較研究。育達科大學報,42,63-86。
  6. 蕭瑞玲、陳綺慧、孟瑛如(2017)。融入音樂治療之棒鐘活動於成人智能障礙者生活照護實務分享。特殊教育季刊,142,11-23。