國小2-3年級團體智力測驗之編製及其信效度研究

The Development of a Group Intelligence Test for Children in Grades 2-3: A Reliability and Validity Study

蔡明富(Ming-Fu Tsai)

資優學生 ； 團體智力測驗 ； 信度 ； 效度 ； gifted student ； group intelligence test ； reliability ； validity

特殊教育與復健學報

30期（2014 / 06 / 01）

23 - 50

繁體中文

本研究旨在編製三式國小2-3年級團體智力測驗（Group Intelligence Test for Children in Grade 2-3，簡稱GITC-G23），以供資優學生鑑定的初步篩選工具。本測驗主要根據流體－晶體智力理論、評量內容兼具語文與非語文、節省施測時間及多套複本測驗等四大特色發展本測驗。本測驗包含語文反義、數字系列與圖形類比三個分測驗，全測驗共有59題，作答採五選一方式，施測時間約40分鐘（含作答說明）。研究結果顯示：在信度方面，分測驗內部一致性係數Cronbach α係數介於.712至.835之間，全測驗為.882。分測驗間隔四週重測信度係數介於.724至.885之間，全測驗為.893；三式測驗複本信度係數介於.725至.794之間。在效度方面，除具內容效度外，本測驗分別與學業成績、「國民小學語文智力測驗」及「托尼非語文智力測驗」有不錯的效標關聯效度；本測驗亦能有效區別資優生與普通生；驗證性因素分析結果得到晶體智力與流體智力兩個因素，顯示本測驗與原先建構因素相符。最後，以2,135名國小2-3年級學生為常模樣本，建立甲式測驗百分等級及常態化的T分數常模。並根據研究結果提出建議，以供未來研究參考。

The purpose of this study was to develop a group intelligence test for children in grades 2-3, which could be used as an identification instrument for gifted students. The four major characteristics of the test were a theoretical basis on crystallized and fluid intelligences, a combination of verbal and nonverbal contents, parsimonious test time, and multiple test forms. It consisted of three subtests: Verbal Reasoning, Arithmetic Reasoning, and Figural Reasoning. It was a group test with a 40-minute time limit for each version. Results revealed that the Cronbach α coefficients of subscales were .712~.835, while for the overall test it was .882. The test-retest reliability coefficients over a period of four weeks were .724~.885, while for the overall test it was .893. The correlations between the different test versions were .725~.794. It was found that the total scores of the test were significantly related to the student's academic performance, the scores of a well-known verbal intelligence test and a nonverbal intelligence test. In addition, a confirmatory factor analysis yielded two factors (crystallized and fluid intelligences) for this test. Generally speaking, the group intelligence test for children (grades 2-3) exhibited acceptable indicator values for reliability and validity. To this end, the normalized t-score norms and percentile ranks for 2,135 subjects in the test (Form A) were also developed. Finally, some suggestions were proposed for future research.

1. Beal, A. L.(1996).A comparison of WISCIII and OLSAT-6 for the identification of gifted students.Canadian Journal of School Psychology,11(2),120-129.
2. Brown, L.,Sherbenou, R.,Johnson, S.(1997).Test of Nonverbal Intelligence.Austin, TX:PRO-ED.
3. Canivez, G. L.(2014).Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: Direct versus indirect hierarchical structures.School Psychology Quarterly,29(1),38-51.
4. Canivez, G. L.,Watkins, M. W.(2010).Investigation of the factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence-fourth edition (WAIS-IV): Exploratory and higher order factor analysis.Psychological Assessmetn,22(4),827-836.
5. Carroll, J. B.(1993).Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
6. Clark, B.(2012).Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at school and home.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
7. Cooper, C.(1999).Intelligence and abilities.London, UK:Routledge.
8. De Ayala, R. J.(2009).The theory and practice of item response theory.New York, NY:Guildford.
9. Demetriou., A.(ed.),Efklides, A.(ed.)(1994).Intelligence, mind, and reasoning: Structure and development.Amsterdam, Holland:North-Holland.
10. Devena, S. E.,Gay, C. E.,Watkins, M. W.(2013).Confirmatory factor analysis of the WISC-IV in a hospital referal sample.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,31(6),591-599.
11. Elliott, C. D.(2007).Differential ability scales, 2nd edition: Introductory and technical handbook.San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation.
12. Flanagan, D. P.(ed.),Genshaft, J. L.(ed.),Harrison, P. L.(ed.)(1997).Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
13. Flanagan, D. P.(ed.),Harrison, P. L.(ed.)(2005).Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
14. Gadow, K. D.(ed.)(1985).Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
15. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2006).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall.
16. Hambleton, R. K.,Swaminathan, H.(1985).Item response theory: Principles and applications.Boston, MA:Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
17. Hammill, D. D.,Pearson, N. A.,Wiederholt, J. E.(1997).Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence.Austin, TX:Pro-Ed.
18. Hussain, L.,Jamil, A.,Siraji, M. J.,Maroof, K.(2012).Development and standardization of intelligence test for children.International Journal of Learning & Development,2(5),190-202.
19. Kamphaus, R. W.(1993).Clinical assessment of children's intelligence.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
20. Kaplan, R. M.,Saccuzzo D. P.(2013).Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues.Belmont, CA:Cengage Learning.
21. Kaufman, A. S.,Kaufman, N. L.(2004).Kaufman assessment battery for children.Circle Pines, MN:American Guidance Service.
22. Kline, P.(1991).Intelligence: The psychometric view.London, UK:Routledge.
23. Kolen, M. J.,Brennan, R. L.(2004).Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices.New York, NY:Springer-Verlag.
24. Lohman, D. F.,Hagen, E.(2001).Cognitive Abilities Test.Itasca, IL:Riverside.
25. McCallum, R. S.(ed.)(2003).Handbook of nonverbal assessment.New York, NY:Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
26. McCallum, R. S.,Bracken, B. A.(1998).The Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test.Itasca, IL:Riverside.
27. McDonald, R. P.,Ho, M. H. R.(2002).Principles and Practice in Reporting Statistical Equation Analyses.Psychological Methods,7(1),64-82.
28. Murphy, K. R.,Davidshofer, C. O.(2004).Psychological testing: Principles and applications.Upper Saddler River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
29. Naglieri, J. A.(2003).Naglieri nonverbal ability test.San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation.
30. Naglieri, J. A.,Bardos, A. N.(1997).Manual for the General Abilities Test for Adults.Minneapolis, MN:National Computer Systems.
31. Naglieri, J. A.,Das, J. P.(1997).Das-Naglieri: Cognitive assessment system.Itasca, IL:Riverside Publishing.
32. Nakano, S.,Watkins, M. W.(2013).Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-fourth edition among referred native American students.Psychology in the Schools,50(10),957-968.
33. Otis, A.,Lennon, R.(1996).Otis-Lennon school ability test.San Antonio, TX:Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement.
34. Preuss, L. J.,Dubow, E. F.(2004).A comparsion between intellectually gifted and typical children in their coping responses to a school and a peer stressor.Roeper Reivew,26(2),105-111.
35. Reynolds, C. R.(ed.),Kamphaus, R. W.(ed.)(2003).Handbook of psychological & educational assessment of children: Intelligence, aptitude, and achievement.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
36. Rizza, M. G.,McIntosh, D. E.,McCunn, A.(2001).Profile analysis of the Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities with gifted students.Psychology in the Schools,38(5),447-455.
37. Roid, G. H.(2003).Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales.Itasca, IL:Riverside Publishing.
38. Stankov, L.(1991).The effects of training and practices on human abilities.Intelligence: Reconceptualization and measurement,Hillsdale, NJ:
39. Sternberg, R. J.(1985).Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
40. Sternberg, R. J.(1992).Ability tests, measurements, and markets.Journal of Educational Psychology,84,134-140.
41. Volker, M. A.,Lopata, C.,Cook- Cottone, C.(2006).Assessment of children with intellectual giftedness and reading disabilities.Psychology in the Schools,43(8),855-869.
42. Watkins, M. W.(2010).Structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Childrenfourth edition among a national sample of referred students.Psychological Assessment,22(4),782-787.
43. Wechsler, D.(2003).The WISC-IV technical and interpretive manual.San Antonio, TX:Psychological Corporation.
44. Woodcock, R. W.,McGrew, K. S.,Mather, N.(2001).Woodcock Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities.Rolling Meadows, IL:Riverside Publishing.
45. 王金香、蕭金土(2006)。團體性向測驗在資賦優異學生甄試運用之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，2(4)，143-162。
46. 朱錦鳳(2005)。圖形思考智能測驗。臺北市:心理。
47. 吳武典、金瑜、張靖卿(2010)。多向度團體智力測驗。臺北市:心理。
48. 吳武典、蔡崇建、胡心慈、王振德、林幸台、郭靜姿(1996)。托尼非語文智力測驗指導手冊。臺北市:心理。
49. 吳訓生(2007)。國民小學學業性向測驗指導手冊。臺北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
50. 林幸台(2002)。國民小學團體語文智力測驗指導手冊。臺北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
51. 林美珍、林邦傑、黃國彥、李富言(2002)。國民小學團體非語文智力測驗指導手冊。臺北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
52. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式。臺北市:雙葉。
53. 俞筱鈞(1993)。瑞文氏圖形推理測驗系列指導手冊。臺北市:中國行為科學社。
54. 徐正穩、路君約(1995)。圖形式智力測驗指導手冊。臺北市:中國行為科學社。
55. 翁儷禎(1997)。推理思考測驗指導手冊。臺北市:測驗出版社。
56. 教育部(2008)。資優教育白皮書。臺北市:作者。
57. 許天威、蕭金土(1999)。綜合性非語文智力測驗。臺北市:心理。
58. 陳榮華(1998)。陳氏非語文能力測驗。臺北市:中國行為科學社。
59. 陳龍安(1996)。智能結構學習能力測驗。臺北市:心理。
60. 黃國彥、鍾思嘉、林珊如、李良哲(1983)。羅桑二氏語文智力測驗指導手冊。臺北市:正昇教育科學社。
61. 黃國彥、鍾思嘉、傅粹馨(1977)。羅桑二氏非語文智力測驗指導手冊。臺北市:正昇教育科學社。
62. 路君約、吳武典、簡明建(2001)。國中學業性向測驗。臺北市:心理。
63. 路君約、盧欽銘(1991)。國民中學智力測驗（第三種）。臺北市:中國行為科學社。
64. 簡茂發(1981)。我國國小及國中學生的智力發展。教育心理學報，14，125-148。

1. 蔡明富、吳裕益(2016)。國中7-9 年級團體智力測驗信度及效度研究。特殊教育與輔助科技學報，9，69-103。