利用全方位設計原則編製國小數學成就測驗之初探研究：以四年級整數四則運算為例

A Pilot Study on Adopting Principles of Universal Design for Assessment to Develop a Mathematical Achievement Test

黃巧雲(Chiao-Yun Huang)；陳明聰(Ming-Chung Chen)

全方位設計評量 ； 整數四則運算測驗 ； 學習障礙 ； universal design for assessment ； achievement test of four arithmetic fundamental operations ； learning disabilities

特殊教育與復健學報

33期（2017 / 06 / 01）

53 - 73

繁體中文

評量是了解學生學習成果的重要手段，但如何讓學生能公平參與考試一直是重要的議題。本研究依全方位設計原則編製國小整數四則運算成就測驗，並分析其信效度；接著以國小五年級學習障礙學生和一般學生各20名為對象，探討兩組學生在兩種形式之複本題目(紙本和電腦報讀)的作答表現是否有差異，以了解在遵循此原則下所編製之試題可否減少無關變異構念的干擾；此外，也探討受試者對兩種版本的作答感受。結果發現，自編成就測驗之古典測驗理論分析結果具有良好鑑別度和信效度，試題難度為.75、鑑別度為.34、Cronbach α係數值為.85、複 本信度為.86。在應用研究中則發現，學生組別和測驗方式間無交互效果，自編成就測驗中作答表現會因學生能力不同而有所差異，但不會因測驗呈現方式不同而有所差異；不管是學習障礙學生或一般學生均偏好在電腦化語音報讀版本進行測驗。

Assessment is one of the major methods to evaluate students' learning outcomes. How to make students participate in assessment fairly has been an important issue. This study aimed to develop a mathematical achievement test for fourth graders based on the principles of universal design. An experiment was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the universally-designed test after its reliability and validity had been confirmed. Twenty fifth graders with learning disabilities and their 20 typical peers were recruited to take the test displayed in two forms, paper-based and computer-based. In addition, the participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire to show their preference for the form of the test they took. The reliability and validity of this achievement test were acceptable. The average difficulty index of the items was .75, the average discrimination index of the items was .34, the reliability coefficient of Cronbach' Alpha of the test was .85, and the reliability coefficient of parallel-forms (paper-based and computer-based) was .86. Although the performance difference between students with ∕ without learning disabilities was significant, there was no significant difference between two forms of the test. There is no significant interaction between the student groups and the test forms either. However, both groups preferred the computer-based test.

1. 余民寧(2005)。教育測驗與評量─成就測驗與教學評量。臺北市:心理。
   連結：
2. 張萬烽、鈕文英(2010)。美國身心障礙學生考試調整策略成效之後設分析。特殊教育研究學刊，35(3)，27-50。
   連結：
3. 曾思瑜(2003)。從「無障礙設計」到「通用設計」—美日兩國無障礙環境理念變遷與發展過程。設計學報，8(2)，57-76。
   連結：
4. 涂釋仁（2006年1月24日）。國文教育::>_<::考試目標是什麼？聯合報，A15版。
5. Eagleton, M. B. (2008). Universal design for learning. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost. com/uploads/thisTopic-dbTopic-1073.pdf
6. Nichols, P., Harms, M., & Walsh, C. (2006). Universal design. Retrieved from http://www.pemsolutions.com/downloads/BULLET1_0606.pdf
7. 特殊教育法（2014）
8. 國民小學及國民中學學生成績評量準則（2015）。
9. Beddow, P. A.,Kettler, R. J.,Elliott, S. N.(2007).Item accessibility and modification guide.Nashville, TN:Vanderbilt University.
10. Bernacchio, C.,Mullen, M.(2007).Universal design for learning.Education & Training,31(2),167-169.
11. Center for Applied Special Technology=CAST(2010).Perspectives on large-scale assessment, universal design, and universal design for learning.Boston, MA:Author.
12. Council of chief state school officers=CCSSO(2003).Quality control checklist for item development and test form construction.Washington, DC:Author.
13. Council of chief state school officers=CCSSO(2003).Quality control checklist for procession, scoring, and reporting.Washington, DC:Author.
14. Dolan, R. P.,Hall, T. E.,Banerjee, M.,Chun, E.,Strangman, N.(2005).Applying principles of universal design to test delivery: The effect of computer-based read-aloud on test performance of high school students with learning disabilities.Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment,3(7)
15. Elbaum, B.(2007).Effects of an oral testing accommodation on the mathematics performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities.Journal of Special Education,40(4),218-229.
16. Elliott, S. N.,Roach, A. T.(2002).The impact of providing testing accommodations to students with disabilities.American Educational Research Association Annual Convention,New Orleans, LA:
17. Fletcher, J. M.,Francis, D. J.,Boudousquie, A.,Copeland, K.,Young, V.,Kalinowski, S.,Vaughn, S.(2006).Effects of accommodations on high-stakes testing for students with reading disabilities.Exceptional Children,72(2),136-150.
18. Hanna, E. I.(2005).PEM Research ReportPEM Research Report,未出版
19. Helwig, R.,Rozek-Tedesco, M. A.,Tindal, G.(2002).An oral versus a standard administration of a large-scale mathematics test.Journal of Special Education,36(1),39-47.
20. Huynh, H.,Meyer, J. P.,Gallant, D. J.(2004).Comparability of student performance between regular and oral administrations for a high-stakes mathematics test.Applied Measurement in Education,17(1),39-57.
21. Johnson, E. S.(2000).The effects of accommodations on performance assessments.Remedial and Special Education,21(5),261-267.
22. Johnstone, C. J.(2003).,Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota.
23. Johnstone, C. J.,Altman, J.,Thurlow, M. L.(2006).,National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.
24. Kaplan, R. M.,Saccuzzo, D. P.(1997).Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues.Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks-Cole.
25. Ketterlin-Geller, L.,Yovanoff, P.,Tindal, G.(2007).Developing a new paradigm for conducting research on accommodations in mathematics testing.Exceptional Children,73,331-347.
26. Kosciolek, S.,Ysseldyke, J. E.(2000).,Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
27. Lerner, J. W.,Johns, B.(2009).Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
28. McKevitt, B. C.,Elliott, S. N.(2003).Effects and perceived consequences of using readaloud and teacher-recommended testing accommodations on a reading achievement test.School Psychology Review,32(4),583-600.
29. National Center on Educational Outcomes=NCEO(2010).Universally designed assessments.Minneapolis, MN:Author.
30. Ofiesh, N.,Rojas, C.,Ward, R.(2006).Universal design and the assessment of student learning in higher education.Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability,19(2),173-181.
31. Rose, D. H.,Meyer, A.(2002).Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
32. Russell, M.,Hoffmann, T.,Higgins, J.(2009).A universally designed test delivery system.Teaching Exceptional Children,42(2),6-12.
33. Susan, C.(2002).Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research AssociationAnnual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association,未出版
34. Thompson, S. J.,Johnstone, C. J.,Anderson, M. E.,Miller, N. A.(2005).,Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
35. Thompson, S. J.,Johnstone, C. J.,Thurlow, M. L.(2002).,Minneapolis, MN:Universal of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
36. Thompson, S.,Thurlow, M.(2002).,Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
37. Tindal, G.,Heath, B.,Hollenbeck, K.,Almond, P.,Harniss, M.(1998).Accommodating students with disabilities on large-scale tests: An experimental study.Exceptional Children,64(4),439-450.
38. Wainer, H.(Ed.),Braun, H. I.(Ed.)(1988).Test validity.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Wolf, M. K.,Griffin, N.,Kao, J. C.,Chang, S. M.,Rivera, N. M.(2009).CRESST ReportCRESST Report,Los Angeles, CA:University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing=CRESST.
40. 余民寧(2008)。教育測驗與評量─成就測驗與教學評量。臺北市:心理。
41. 李佳玲(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系碩士班。
42. 林筱汶、陳明聰(2006)。語音調整策略對不同能力學生數學文字題解題表現成效之研究。國立嘉義大學2006年特殊教育國際學術研討會論文集，嘉義縣:
43. 柯華葳(1999)。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會特殊教育工作小組。
44. 張惠娟(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系碩士班。
45. 教育部(2009)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域。臺北市:作者。
46. 龍麗華(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士班。
47. 鍾素香(2002)。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,國科會。
48. 羅啟宏(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，中國文化大學地學研究所。