人工電子耳對成人植入者的心理社會效益及其影響因素之研究

Psychosocial Benefits of the Adults with Cochlear Implants and the Related Factors to Predict These Outcomes

10.6143/JSLHAT.2010.06.01

劉俊榮(Chun-Jung Liu)；劉樹玉(Shu-Yu Liu)；黃國祐(Kuo-You Huang)；郭于靚(Yu-Ching Kuo)；王南梅(Nan-Mai Wang)

人工電子耳 ； 成人 ； 心理社會效益 ； 相關因素 ； Cochlear implant ； Adult recipients ； Psychosocial benefits ； Predictive factors

台灣聽力語言學會雜誌

25期（2010 / 06 / 01）

1 - 22

繁體中文

人工電子耳能回復植入者部分聽知覺能力，但在心理社會層面的效益則有待評估。本研究以61位使用人工電子耳的成人為對象，採問卷調查法探究人工電子耳對使用者心理與社會兩方面的效益，並分析相關變項的預測力與重要性。 本研究工具「人工電子耳對成人植入者心理社會效益量表」，分為情緒與社會情境兩個分量表，經過試題分析、內部一致性分析、以及因素分析等方式檢定，為具有鑑別度、信度與效度的評估工具。 調查結果顯示人工電子耳確實能夠改善多數使用者的心理社會問題，但使用者仍然自覺有障礙感，且在噪音環境的效益相對較差。此外，平均而言，人工電子耳雖然有明顯效益，但個別差異懸殊，少數個案並未獲益。 在預測變項方面，本研究共計檢驗植入耳、植入時間、溝通方式、以及復健時間等15個變項。這些變項當中，能有效預測人工電子耳在心理層面的效益者，依重要性排序分別是植入人工電子耳的決定正確性、使用時的聽覺困難程度、以及每日使用人工電子耳的時間量；社會情境效益的預測變項，依重要性排序分別為植入人工電子耳的決定正確性、使用時的聽覺困難程度、以及人工電子耳的使用頻率、使用者的實足年齡；能有效預測全量表效益的變項依序為植入人工電子耳的決定正確性、使用時的聽覺困難程度。綜合言之，植入人工電子耳的決定正確性、使用時的聽覺困難程度是最具預測力的變項。

Background: Cochlear implantation has demonstrated to improve the auditory performance of the recipients to a great extent; however, psychosocial benefits of adult recipients after implantation remained further investigated. Objective: The objective of this questionnaire survey was to investigate social and emotional benefits of 61 adults after cochlear implantation and also to analyze important factors to predict these outcomes. Methods: ”The psychosocial scale of adult recipients with CIs” was developed to measure the social/situation and emotional performance of adult recipients. With several statistical models, item analysis, internal consistency reliability, and factor analysis had been performed, this scale was verified to be a discriminative, reliable and valid instrument. Results: The results demonstrated that the majority of adults with CIs responded favorably to cochlear implantation in regard to these psychosocial benefits. However, the feeling of handicap continued to exist among recipients, specifically, under noisy environments. In addition, the individual variability of psychosocial performance was also demonstrated, and few recipients were not benefited from implantation. The predictive factors of these outcomes included fifteen variables to be analyzed, such as the implanted ear, duration of implant use, communication mode, rehabilitation training, and others. Among these variables, the importance of predictive valid factors regarding to the emotion domain were the assertiveness of implantation decision, the degree of auditory difficulty when using CIs, and the daily amount of time using CIs. In contrast, those of the predictive variables of the social/situation domain were the assertiveness of CI decision, the degree of auditory difficulty when using CIs, and the frequency of CI use. Overall, the predictive valid factors of the whole scale demonstrated the assertiveness of CI decision and the degree of auditory difficulty when using CIs. Conclusion: Above all, the assertiveness of CI decision and the degree of auditory difficulty when using CIs were two most valid factors to predict psychosocial benefits of those adult recipients with CIs in this survey.

1. 吳裕益（2004）。類別迴歸分析。未出版之手稿，國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。
2. Alpiner, J. G.(Ed.),McCarthy, P. A.(Ed.)(1993).Rehabilitative audiology: Children and adults.Baltimore, MD:Lippineott Williams & Wilkins.
3. Byrne, B. M.(2001).Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Dalton, D. S.,Cruickshanks, K. J.,Klein, B. E. K.,Klein, R.,Wiley, T. L.,Nondahl, D. M.(2003).The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults.The Gerontologist,43,661-668.
5. Damen, G. W.,Beynon, A. J.,Krabbe, P. F.,Mulder, J. J.,Mylanus, E. A.(2007).Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: Long-term follow-up.Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,136,597-604.
6. Danermark, B.(1998).Hearing impairment, emotions and audiological rehabilitation: A sociological perspective.Scandinavian Audiology,27(suppl. 49),125-131.
7. Faber, C. E.,Grontved, A. M.(2000).Cochlear implantation and change in quality of life.ActaOtolaryngologica,120(suppl. 543),151-153.
8. Fetterman, B. L.,Domico, E. H.(2002).Speech recognition in background noise of cochlear implant patients.Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,126,257-263.
9. Finlay, L.,Molano-Fisher, P.(2008)."Transforming" self and world: A phenomenological study of a changing lifeworld following a cochlear implant.Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy,11,255-267.
10. Fu, Q.-J.,Nogaki, G.(2005).Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: The role of spectral resolution and smearing.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology,6,19-27.
11. Galvin, J. J.,Fu, Q.-J.,Shannon, R. V.(2009).Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1169,518-533.
12. Geers, A.,Brenner, C.,Davidson, L.(2003).Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.Ear and Hearing,24,24S-35S.
13. Gould, J.,Lane, H.,Vick, J.,Perkell, J. S.,Matthies, M. L.,Zandipour, M.(2001).Changes in speech intelligibility of postlingually deaf adults after cochlear implantation.Ear and Hearing,22,453-460.
14. Hair, J. F.,Tatham, R. L.,Anderson, R. E.,Black, W.(1998).Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.).Boston:Prentice Hall.
15. Hallberg, L. R.-M.,Ringdahl, A.(2004).Living with cochlear implants: Experiences of 17 adults patients in Sweden.International Journal of Audiology,43,115-121.
16. Hamzavi, J.,Baumgartner, W.-D.,Pok, S. M.,Franz, P.,Gstoettner, W.(2003).Variables affecting speech perception in postlingually deaf adults following cochlear implantation.ActaOtolaryngologica,123,493-498.
17. Harris, J. P.,Anderson, J. P.,Novak, R.(1995).An outcomes study of cochlear implants in deaf patients: Audiologic, economic and quality-of-life changes.Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,121,398-404.
18. Harrison, R. V.,Gordon, K. A.,Mount, R. J.(2005).Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation.Developmental Psychobiology,46,252-261.
19. Hawthorne, G.,Hogan, A.(2002).Measuring disability-specific patient benefit in cochlear implant programs: Developing a short form of the Glasgow health status inventory, the hearing participation scale.International Journal of Audiology,41,535-544.
20. Hawthorne, G.,Hogan, A.,Giles, E.,Stewart, M.,Kethel, L.,White, K.(2004).Evaluating the health-related quality of life effects of cochlear implants: A prospective study of an adult cochlear implant program.International Journal of Audiology,43,183-192.
21. Hinderink, J. B.,Krabbe, P. F. M.,Van Den Broek, P.(2000).Development and application of a healthrelated quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: The Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire.Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,123,756-765.
22. Hirschfelder, A.,Gräbel, S.,Olze, H.(2008).The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life:The role of audiologic performance and variables.Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,138,357-362.
23. Humes, L. E.(1999).Dimensions of hearing aid outcome.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology,10,26-39.
24. Kaplan, D. M.,Shipp, D. B.,Chen, J. M.,Ng, A. H.,Nedzelski, J. M.(2003).Early-deafened adults cochlear implant users: Assessment of outcomes.The Journal of Otolaryngology,32,245-249.
25. Kent, B.,Grow, S. L.(2007).The role of hope in adjustment to acquired hearing loss.International Journal of Audiology,46,328-340.
26. Kerr, P.,Cowie, R.(1997).Acquired deafness: A multi-dimensional experience.British Journal of Audiology,31,177-188.
27. Knutson, J. F.,Murray, K. T.,Husarek, S.,Westerhouse, K.,Woodworth, G.,Gantz, B. J.(1998).Psychological change over 54 months of cochlear implant use.Ear and Hearing,19,191-201.
28. Krabbe, P. F.,Hinderink, J. B.,Van Den Broek, P.(2000).The effect of cochlear implant use in postlingually deaf adults.International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,16,864-873.
29. Lassaletta, L.,Castro, A.,Bastarrica, M.,José de Sarriá, M.,Gavilán, J.(2006).Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation.European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology,263,267-270.
30. Liu, C. J.,Chen, H. C.(2008).Subjective measurement of cochlear implant users in different listening conditions.International Congress of Audiology,Hong Kong:
31. Liu, C.,Galvin, J. J., III,Fu, Q.-J.,Narayanan, S. S.(2008).Effect of spectral normalization on different talker speech recognition by cochlear implant users.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,123,2836-2847.
32. Loizou, P. C.,Hu, Y.,Litovsky, R.,Yu, G.,Peter, R.,Lake, J.(2009).Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail party setting.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology,125,372-383.
33. Luo, X.,Fu, Q.-J.,Wu, H.-P.,Hsu, C.-J.(2009).Concurrent-vowel and tone recognition by Mandarinspeaking cochlear implant users.Hearing Research,256,75-84.
34. Mo, B.,Lindbaek, M.,Harris, S.(2005).Cochlear implants and quality of life: A prospective study.Ear and Hearing,26,186-194.
35. Mulrow, C. D.,Aguilar, C.,Endicott, J. E.,Velez, R.,Tuley, M. R.,Charlip, W. S.(1990).Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals.Journal of American Geriatrics Society,38,45-50.
36. Newman, C. W.,Weinstein, B. E.,Jacobson, G. P.,Hug, G. A.(1991).Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for adults.Ear and Hearing,12,355-357.
37. Newman, C. W.,Weinstein, B. E.,Jacobson, G. P.,Hug, G. A.(1990).The hearing handicap inventory for adults: Psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates.Ear and Hearing,11,430-433.
38. Noble, W(1998).Self-assessment of hearing and related functions.London:Whurr.
39. Pennings, R. J. E.,Damen, G. W. J. A.,Snik, F. M.,Hoefsloot, L.,Cremers, C. W. R. J.,Mylanus, E. A. M.(2006).Audiologic performance and benefit of cochlear implantation in Usher Syndrome type I.Laryngoscope,116,717-722.
40. Saunders, G. H.,Forsline, A.(2006).The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.Ear and Hearing,27,229-242.
41. Scherer, M. J.,Frisina, D. R.(1998).Characteristics associated with marginal hearing loss and subjective well-being among a sample of older adults.Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development,35,420-426.
42. Schramm, D.,Fitzpatrick, E.,Seguin, C.(2002).Cochlear implantation for adolescents and adults with prelinguistic deafness.Otology and Neurotology,23,698-703.
43. Stephens, D.(1997).Audiological rehabilitation.Adult audiology,Oxford:
44. Tanaka, J. S.(1993).Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models.Testing structural equation models,Newbury Park, CA:
45. Ventry, I. M.,Weinstein, B. E.(1982).The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: A new tool.Ear and Hearing,3,128-134.
46. Vermeire, K.,Brokx, J. P. L.,Wuyts, F. L.,Cochet, E.,Hofkens, A.,Van de Heyning, P. H.(2005).Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly.Otology and Neurotology,26,188-195.
47. Yoshida, H.,Kanda, Y.,Miyamoto, I.,Fukuda, T.,Takahashi, H.(2008).Cochlear implantation on perlingually deafened adults.Auris Nasus Larynx,35,349-352.
48. Zeng, F. G.(2004).Trends in cochlear implants.Trends in Amplification,8,1-34.
49. Zhao, F.,Bai, Z.,Stephens, D.(2008).The relationship between changes in self-rated quality of life after cochlear implantation and changes in individual complaints.Clinical Otolaryngology,33,427-434.
50. 王保進(2006)。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北市:心理。
51. 王南梅、劉樹玉、詹妍玲、黃俊生(1998)。人工電子耳兒童之聽知覺能力研究。聽語會刊，12，1-13。
52. 吳明隆(2006)。結構方程模式：SIMPLIS的應用。台北市:五南。
53. 李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用：Graphics & Basic。台北市:心理。
54. 林永松、彭淑貞、張顯達(2002)。人工耳蝸植入兒童之國語輔音發音與聽辨。中華民國耳鼻喉科醫學雜誌，37，250-259。
55. 陳小娟(1997)。三至八歲聽覺障礙兒童語音聽知覺接受力之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，7，51-78。
56. 陳小娟(2000)。人工電子耳孩童聽覺說話長期發展之研究。特教學報，14，65-92。
57. 黃芳銘(2004)。結構方程模式：理論與應用（第三版）。台北市:五南。

1. 萬宗綸(2016)。轉聲∕身術臺灣聽障者的賽伯格、身分協商與空間性。地理學報，81，1-26。