一個機率性土地發展分析模式

A Probabilistic Model of Land Development Analysis

鄒克萬(Ko-Wan Tsou)；張曜麟(Yao-Lin Chang)

空間選擇 ； 地理資訊系統 ； 個體選擇理論 ； spatial choice ； GIS ； discrete choice theory

臺灣土地研究

1期（2000 / 06 / 01）

51 - 66

繁體中文

傳統土地使用研究多偏向總體性之描述解釋，缺乏以微觀觀點來考量環境因子對個別土地發展的影響，較少觸及個別土地可能因環境屬性而影響其土地發展之狀況，以致較難深入掌握個別土地發展的因果關係。因此，本文乃選取適當的影響土地發展之環境潛能因子，利用個體選擇理論（discrete choice theory），建構一個「機率性土地發展分析模式」；其間並結合地理資訊系統技術，進行模式校估及分析各項有關空間資料之處理與分析；最後並以嘉義縣中埔鄉為例進行個案實證研究。全文內容包括： 1.前言；2.相關文獻回顧；3.模式建構；4.實證研究；5.結論與建議。結果發現地形、斷層、地質等11個因子，確實是土地是否發展的主要影響因素。

Most of the traditional studies about land use mainly focus on general description and overall interpretation, thus, ignore the differences among each land parcel and the micro view points. As the result, we are unable to draw up specific land development based on the present studies. Therefore, this paper adapts environmental factors which effecting land development, and builds the Probabilistic Model of Land Development Analysis with the technologies of Discrete Choice theory and Geographic Information System. The purpose of this paper is to capture the relationships between the environmental potential and land development, and to analyze spatial situations of lands, to be the forward-looking of land development. The study on Chunpu, the area in Chai-yi County, is made as the empirical study of this paper. There are five parts in this paper, including introduction, documents review, model framework, the empirical study and the conclusion. Our result shows that the 11 main factors of which affect the land development for sure are topography, geology and the geology fault...etc.

1. Alonso, W.(1964).Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent.Cambridge Massachusetts:Harvard University Press.
2. Anderson, S. P.,Palma, A.,Thisse, J.F.(1992).Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation.Cambridge Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
3. Blat, J.,Delgado, A.(1995).Designing multimedia GIS for territorial planning: The ParcBIT case.Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design,22(6),665-678.
4. Bucklin, Randolph E.,Russell, Gary J.(1998).A relationship between market share elasticities and brand switching probabilities.Journal of Marketing Research,35(1),99-113.
5. Burley, J. B.,Brown, T. J.(1995).Constructing Interpretable Environments From Multidimensional Data: Gis Suitability Overlays and Principal Component Analysis.Journal of Environmental Planning & Management,38(4),536-550.
6. Chase, S. C.(1999).Supporting emergence in geographic information systems.Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design,26(1),33-44.
7. Cox, A.B.,Gifford, F.(1997).An overview to geographic information systems.Journal of Academic Librarianship,23(6),449-460.
8. Hopkins, Lewis E.(1997).Methods for Generating Land Suitability Maps: A Comparative Evaluation.Journal of the American Institute of Planners,43(4),386-400.
9. Jankowski, P.,Richard, L.(1994).Integration of GIS-based Suitability Analysis and Multicriteria Evaluation in a Spatial Decision.Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design,21(3),323-340.
10. Landis, J.,Zhang, M.(1998).The second generation of the California urban futures model. Part II: Specification and Calibration results of the land-use change submodel.Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design,25(6),795-824.
11. Lober, D. J.(1995).Resolving the siting impasse.Journal of the American Planning Association,61(4),482-495.
12. Luce, R.D.(1959).Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis.New York:Wiley.
13. Makropoulos, C.,Butler, D.,Maksimovic, C.(1999).GIS supported evaluation of source control applicability in urban areas.Water Science And Technology,39(9),243-252.
14. Malczewski, J.,Moreno-Sanchez, R.(1997).Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Model For Environmental Conflict Analysis in The Cape Region Mexico.Journal of Environmental Planning & Management,40(3),349-374.
15. McFadden, D.(1986).The choice Theory of Market Research.Marketing Science,5(4),275-297.
16. McHarg, I. L.(1969).Design with Nature.New York:Doubleday Garden City.
17. McQuaid, R.W.,Leitham, S.(1996).Accessibility and location decisions in a peripheral region of Europe: A logit analysis, Regional Studies,30(6),579-588.
18. Sàrközy, F.(1994).The GIS Concept and 3-Dimensional Modeling.Computers, Environment and Urban System,18(2),111-121.
19. Shukla, V.,Waddell, P.(1991).Firm location and land use in discrete urban space: a study of the spatial structure of Dallas-Fort Worth.Regional Science and Urban Economics,21,225-253.
20. Steiner, F.(1983).Resource suitability: methods for analysis.Environmental Management,7(5),401-420.
21. Tversky, A.(1969).Intransitivity of Preference.Psychological Review,76,31-48.
22. Wakita, S.(1997).Factors affecting household financial expectations: A multinomial logit analysis.Consumer Interests Annual,43,231-233.
23. Watkins, R. L.,Cocklin, C.(1997).The use of geographic information systems for resource evaluation: A New Zealand example.Journal of Environmental Planning & Management,40(1),37-57.
24. Wider, M.G.(1985).Site and Situation Determinants of Land Use Change: an Empirical Example.Economic Geography,61(4),332-344.
25. Wu, F.(1998).An Empirical model of Intrametropolitan Land-Use Changes in a Chinese City.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,25(2),245-263.
26. Xiang, W. N.,Whitley, D.L.(1994).Weighting land suitability factors by the PLUS method.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,21(3),273-304.
27. 內政部營建署(1992)。台灣地區環境敏感地劃設與土地使用適宜性分析（北、南部區域）。
28. 內政部營建署(1996)。台灣中部區域環境敏感地劃設與土地使用適宜性分析技術報告。
29. 施鴻志(1997)。都市規劃。建都
30. 黃書禮(1987)。國立中興大學都市計劃研究所國立中興大學都市計劃研究所,未出版
31. 鄒克萬(1997)。國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。

1. 許明芳、林子欽(2003)。個別土地開發前的產權調整—市地重劃區個案觀察。台灣土地研究，6(2)，1-16。
2. 葉光毅、紀雲曜、李上妤(2005)。平原區土地利用潛力評估模式之研究—以台南高鐵特定區爲例。建築學報，54，131-157。
3. (2004)。都市土地使用變遷空間動態模型之研究。地理學報，35，35-51。