兩岸土地開發制度與城市競爭力關係之探討

An Examination of the Relationships between Taiwan and China Cities' Land Development System and Competitiveness

10.6677/JTLR.199105_(2).0003

金家禾(Chia-Ho Ching)

土地開發 ； 競爭力 ； 土地開發制度 ； Land Development ； Competitiveness ； Land Development Institutions

臺灣土地研究

10卷1期（2010 / 03 / 01）

73 - 100

繁體中文

提升城市競爭力之議題於全球化趨勢下漸受重視，土地開發供應各種都市活動所需用地及空間，故其有可能與城市競爭力間具有密切之關係，甚至是影響競爭力之重要因素，然而土地開發受開發體制之影響與限制，所以城市競爭力與土地開發體制間亦可能具有密切之關係，本文透過對土地開發過程相關制度因素之分析，並對具有跨越海峽兩岸不同制度不同城市土地開發經驗之土地開發業者進行訪談調查，以分析及檢視土地開發與提升城市競爭力間互動之關係，結論為土地開發體制確實影響競爭力之提升，土地開發成效並可作為評定城市競爭力之一項指標。為提升競爭力，城市政府有必要認真地分析與檢討其土地開發體制，並對影響土地開發效率之因素（或障礙根源），加以調整改善，以促使土地開發之有效進行。

How to promote a city's competitiveness has become an important issue under the pressure of globalization. As the space needed by various social and economic activities is mainly relied on developers' investment decisions in land development projects, the ability to sustain a city's attractiveness to land developments may demonstrate its competitiveness. Further, the activities or operations of land development within a city are influenced and constrained by the city's institutional configurations. Thus, there may have a strong connection between a city's competitiveness and its institutional elements in property development. This paper examines this possible connection by analyzing and comparing relative institutional elements in the development process in different localities. These elements include: the pattern of property ownership; planning or land use management regulations; the city government's interventions in the property market; and the networks of local property development industry. The comparison is undertaking by a survey of land developers, who have various land developmental experiments in different cities between Taiwan and China where the institutional environments for land development are quite different. The study concludes that a city's institutional configurations in land development are essential elements for promoting its competitiveness, and its attractiveness to land developments can be used as an indicator for its competitiveness. Furthermore, in order to enlarge its competitiveness, there is a need for a city government to examine honestly its land development institutions. Through this effort, the obstacles that constrain the operations of land development can be found out. Further endeavors are required in modifying these institutional deficiencies in order to promote the efficiency of land development and the quality of development outcomes.

1. (1997).European Cities in Competition.Aldershot:Avebury.
2. (1997).Market Potential, Investment Climate.Far Eastern Economic Review,August
3. Amin, A., Thrift, N.(1995).Managing Cities: The New Urban Context.London:John Wiley ＆ Sons.
4. Begg, I.(1999).Cities and Competitiveness.Urban Studies,36(5/ 6)
5. Boyne, G. A.(1996).Competition and Local Government: A Public Choice Perspective.Urban Studies,33(4/ 5)
6. Castells, M.(1996).The Rise of the Network Society: Economy, Society and Culture.Oxford:Blackwell.
7. Cheshire, P. C., Gordon, I. R.(1996).Territorial Competition and the Predictability of Collective Action.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,20
8. D''Arcy, E., Keogh, G.(1999).The Property Market and Urban Competition: A Review.Urban Studies,36(5/ 6)
9. D''Arcy, E., Keogh, G.(1997).Towards a Property Market Paradigm of Urban Change.Environment Planning, A,29
10. Fothergill, S., Monk, S., Perry, M.(1987).Property and Industrial Development.London:Hutchinson.
11. Garba, S. B., Al-Mubaiyedh, S.(1999).An Assessment Framework for Public Urban Land Management.Land Use Policy,16
12. Gordon, I. R., Cheshire, P. C.(1998).International Workshop on 'Theories of Regional Economic Renewal and Growth'.Uddevalla, Sweden:
13. Halia, A.(1999).City Building in the East and West.Cities,16(4)
14. Hall, P.(1995).Cities in Competition.Melbourne:Longman Australia.
15. Healey, P.(1994).Urban policy and property development: The institutional relations of real-estate development in an old industrial regions.Environment and Planning, A,26
16. Jiang, Dian-Chun, Chen, Jing-Han, Isaac, D.(1998).The Effect of Foreign Investment on the Real Estate Industry in China.Urban Studies,35(11)
17. Kantor, P., David, S.(1988).The Dependent City.London:Glanview.
18. Lever, W. F., Turok, I.(1999).Competitive Cities: Introduction to the Review.Urban Studies,36(5/ 6)
19. Naughton, B.(1994).Chinese Institutional Innovation and Privatization from Below.American Economic Review,84(2)
20. Peck, F. W.(1996).Regional Development and the Production of Space: The Role of Infrastructure in the Attraction of New Inward Investment.Environment and Planning, A,28
21. Perry, M.(1986).Small Factories and Economic Development.Aldershot:Gower.
22. Porter, M. E.(1995).The competitive advantage of the inner city.Harvard Business Review,73(3)
23. Poter, M.(1998).The Competitive Advantage of Nations.London:Macmillan.
24. Ricci, L. A.(1999).Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: Agglomeration versus Specialization.European Economic Review,43
25. Rose, J.(1994).Land Management: New Directions.New York:A. E. and F. N. Spon.
26. Sassen, S.(1995).Cities in Competition.Melbourne, Australia:Longman Australia.
27. Stewart, M.(1996).Competition and Competitiveness in Urban Policy.Public Money and Management,16
28. Thornton, E.(1995).Asian Infrastructure: Big, Bigger and Biggest.Far Eastern Economic Review
29. Walder, A. G.(1995).Local Governments as Industrial Firms: An Organizational Analysis of China's Transitional Economy.American Journal of Sociology,101(2)
30. Xu, S. Q.(1996).Guangzhou Developers Appeal for Slimming.中外房地產導報 Chinese and Foreign Real Estate Times,21
31. Zhang, Xing-Quan(1997).Urban Land Reform in China.Land Use Policy,14(3)
32. Zhu, Jiemin(1994).Changing Land Policy and Its Impacts on Local Growth: The Experience of the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, China, in the 1980s.Urban Studies,31(10)
33. Zhu, Jieming(1999).Local Growth Coalition: The Context and Implications of China's Gradualist Urban Land Reforms.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,23(3)
34. 林文玲 Lin, Wen-Ling(1992)。土地、財團、選舉。台北:天下雜誌。
35. 林初昇 Lin, George Chu-Sheng(1999).State policy and Spatial restructuring in post-reform China, 1978-95.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,23(4)
36. 國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所 、 中國土地經濟學會(1999)。臺北縣都市計畫工業區土地使用現況調查。臺北縣政府。
37. 楊重光(1996)。城市土地管理與可持續發展。北京:中國大地出版社。
38. 戴慕珍 Oi, Jean C.(1995).The Role of the Local State in China's Transitional Economy.The China Quarterly,144

1. 賴世剛、彭建文、江渾欽(2007)。大型、分享式不動産數位資料庫系統的規劃與建置—以台北市為例。台灣土地研究，10(2)，67-93。