颱風損害之綜合評估：模糊多準則評估法之應用

A Comprehensive Evaluation on Typhoon Damage: Using Fuzzy Multicriteria Evaluation Method

10.6677/JTLR.200205_(4).0001

洪鴻智(Hung-Chih Hung)

災害 ； 颱風 ； 不確定性 ； 模糊集合 ； 環境風險 ； 多準則評估 ； hazards ； typhoon ； uncertainty ； fuzzy sets ； environmental risk ； multicriteria evaluation

臺灣土地研究

4期（2002 / 05 / 01）

1 - 27

繁體中文

傳統颱風損害之評估存在兩個主要之課題，第一個課題為傳統對颱風之損害評估多偏向單損害項目與單地區之評估，缺乏跨區域、多項目及能處理不同資料型態的多準則綜合評估方式。另一個課題為颱風損害評估與資料蒐集過程常發生的資訊不充足、不確定與主觀判定之困境。本文之目的在引入模糊理論，建立多準則颱風損害綜合評估模型，以改善傳統颱風損害評估模式的不足。文中以近年台灣六個主要颱風損害為案例，以建立的模式，估計各颱風之綜合損害及各颱風在各縣市的綜合損害，估計結果發現資料所隱含之模糊度愈高，所估計之颱風災害損害程度愈低；相對地，隱含之模糊度愈低則估計之損害程度愈高。代表災害損害估計過程如忽略資料的粗略性，將嚴重扭曲損害估計之成果，可能高估高損害程度之颱風損害，而低估低損害程度颱風之損害。

Conventional evaluation methods on typhoon damage are mainly focused upon mono-item or mono-area, rather than deal with comprehensive damage estimating for multi-items, multi-typhoon or multi-areas. Furthermore, it is usually suffered from the information insufficiency, uncertainty, and subjective judgment while proceeds with the data surveying and damage estimating on typhoon. To the purpose of mitigating these two problems, the main purpose of this paper is to establish a multicriteria comprehensive model using fuzzy set theory, and employ this model as an instrument to evaluate six recently major typhoon damages in Taiwan as a case study. The items in the case study that include two aspects: (1) the comprehensive damage degree evaluating of each typhoon, and (2) the damage geographical distribution estimating in each prefecture/city for each typhoon. It is found that the damage estimation shows where as the potential fuzziness within surveying data increases, as the less of an estimating damages degree, and vice versa. These results represent that if estimator ignores the potential roughness within surveying data in damage estimating process, then the evaluation of damage will be distorted. Therefore, it will be more overestimated the damages, while greater the typhoon damage exposes. In the other hand, will it more underestimate the damage, while which the less the typhoon damages.

1. Barlow, J., Glover, F.(1990).Operations Research and Artificial Intelligence: The Integration of Problem-Solving Strategies.London:Kluwer.
2. Bendimerad, F.(2001).Loss Estimation: A Powerful Tool for Risk Assessment and Mitigation.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,21
3. Boswell, M. R., Deyle, R. E., Smith, R. A., Baker, E. J.(1999).A Quantitative Method for Estimating Probable Public Costs of Hurricanes.Environmental Management,23(3)
4. Deyle, R. E., Smith, R. A.(2000).Risk-Based Taxation of Hazardous Land Development.Journal of the American Planning Association,66(4)
5. Federal Emergency Management Agency(1997).Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology - HAZUS Technical Manual (Vol. III).Washington, DC:
6. Greenwood, D. J., Hatheway, D. J.(1996).Assessing Opal's Impact.Civil Engineering,66(1)
7. Heilpern, S.(1997).Representation and Application of Fuzzy Numbers.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,91(2)
8. Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M. M.(1988).Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science.New York:Elsevier.
9. Kim, K., Park, K. S.(1990).Ranking fuzzy numbers with index of optimism.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,35
10. Mansur, Y. M.(1995).Fuzzy Sets and Economics: Application of Fuzzy Mathematics to Non-Cooperative Oligopoly.Hands England:Edward Elgar.
11. McAllister, D. M.(1980).Evaluation in Environmental Planning: Assessing Environmental, Social, Economics, and Political Trade-Offs.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
12. Perry, D. C., Stubbs, N.(1998).INEEL Annual Conference.Idaho Falls, IO:
13. Petak, W. J., Atkisson, A. A.(1982).Natural Hazard Risk Assessment and Public Policy: Anticipating the Unexpected.New York:Springer-Verlag.
14. Sarin, R.(2000).Decision rules with bounded memory.Journal of Economic Theory,90(1)
15. Shi, Y., 游伯龍 Yu, Po-Lung(1989).Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using Microcomputers.Berlin:Springer-Verlag.
16. Song, Bo, Hao, S., Murakami, S., Sadohara, S.(1996).Comprehensive Evaluation Method on Earthquake Damage Using Fuzzy Theory.Journal of Urban Planning and Development,122(1)
17. Triantaphyllou, E., Pardalos, P. M., Mann, S. H.(1990).Operations Research and Artificial Intelligence: The Integration of Problem-Solving Strategies.Boston, MA:Kluwer.
18. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.(1982).Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
19. Wilson, A. R.(1991).Environmental Risk: Identification and Management.Chelsea, MI.:Lewis.
20. Zadeh, L. A.(1965).Fuzzy Sets.Information and Control,8
21. Zadeh, L. A.(1975).The Concept of A Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning, Part 1.Information Sciences,8(2)
22. Zhu, Q., Lee, E. S.(1992).Fuzzy Regression Analysis.Warsaw:Omnitech Press.
23. Zimmermann, H. J.(1992).Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications.Boston:Kluwer.
24. 洪鴻智 Hung, Hung-Chih(1998)。中華民國區域科學學會1998年學術研討會。臺北:國立臺灣大學。
25. 洪鴻智 Hung, Hung-Chih(1996)。工業區環境風險管理：REACT模型之應用。法商學報 Journal of Law and Commerce，32
26. 洪鴻智 Hung, Hung-Chih, 詹士樑 Chan, Shih-Liang, 陳亮全 , 林文苑(2000).Natural Hazards Mitigation Workshop.Ottawa, Canada:
27. 陳亮全 、 洪鴻智 Hung, Hung-Chih、 賴美如(2001)。2001年地震災害境況模擬研討會。臺北:國家地震工程中心。
28. 馮正民 Feng, Cheng-Min、 呂秀玉 Lu, Hsiu-Yu(1997)。模糊方法在質化評估準則之運用－交通建設土地徵收難易度為例 Using Fuzzy Model in Qualitative Criteria Evaluation - A Case Study for Difficulty Level of Land Acquisition in Transportation Projects。都市與計劃 City and Planning，24(1)
29. 熊光華 、 簡賢文 Chien, Shen-Wen、 張仕獻 、 黃弟勝(1997)。中華民國都市計劃學會1997年年會及學術研討會。臺北:中國文化大學。
30. 鄧振源 Teng, Junn-Yuan, 曾國雄 Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung(1996).Fuzzy Multicriteria Ranking of Urban Transportation Investment Alternative.Transportation Planning and Technology,20(1)

1. 陳羚怡、洪鴻智(2007)。洪災風險評估與災害風險稅課徵—以台北市為例。台灣土地研究，10(2)，95-125。
2. 洪啟東、林文苑(2017)。台灣本島網格化災害脆弱度空間分佈評估與OWA 分析應用。地理學報，87，39-78。
3. 簡頌愔、劉怡君、洪鴻智(2014)。河川流域颱風災害損失與地區脆弱度莫拉克颱風為例。地理學報，74，87-106。