地主和承租人如何面對土地徵收的風險？

How do Landowners and Tenants Respond to a Remote Land Takings?

10.6677/JTLR.200405_7(1).0001

林子欽(Tzu-Chin Lin)；張正(Jeng Jang)

土地徵收 ； 地主行為理論 ； 財產權保障 ； Land Takings ； Landowners' Behavior ； Protection of Property Rights

臺灣土地研究

7卷1期（2004 / 05 / 01）

1 - 18

繁體中文

探討土地徵收補償時如果僅考慮補償數額，無異是一種靜態的思考模式而忽略了徵收的動態過程。台灣土地徵收補償的數額長期低於市價，也存在公共設施保留地對財產權長期限制的問題。在這樣的背景因素下，土地徵收所牽涉的權利關係人除了消極地等待補償，也將積極地設法減低財產的損失。對於省道台一線經高雄縣路竹鄉路段（中山路）道路拓寬工程的實證研究發現，在缺乏減低權利關係人財產損失的政策設計下，他們將透過市場形式（如購買鄰地、提早搬遷）或政治過程（如集體陳情）以求降低財產的損失。

Consideration of only compensation amount while discussing land takings ignores its dynamic process. Compensation amount for takings in Taiwan has long been substantially lower than the market value. What is more, the value of properties to be taken is often impaired due to the protracted period of waiting for takings. In consequence, people with interests in land to be taken have an incentive of finding ways to reduce their loss of property value. A case study of road-widening project in Lu-Ju township supports the above arguments. In the face of land takings in an uncertain future, a significant number of landowners and tenants have purchased contiguous land parcels for house extension at a later date, have moved out before takings occur and also have held a series of political petitions. All these actions are taken in an attempt to reduce their loss of property values.

1. 蔡吉源(2001)。台灣土地課稅制度：問題、影響與改革。台灣土地研究，3(3)，37-82。
   連結：
2. Adams, C.(1995).Urban Planning and the Development Process.London:University College London Press.
3. Adams, C.,May, H.(1991).Active and Passive Behaviour in Land Ownership.Urban Studies,28(5),687-705.
4. Aguilar, R.,Sandelin, B.(1988).Qualitative Response Estimations of the Selling Behaviour in the Swedish Market for Owner-Occupied Houses.Urban Studies,25,77-84.
5. Barnard, C.,Butcher, W.(1989).Landowner Characteristics: A Basis for Location Decisions in The Urban Fringe.American Agricultural Economics Association August,679-684.
6. Brown, H.,Phillips, R.,Roberts, N.(1981).Land Markets at the Urban Fringe-New Insights for Policy Makers.Journal of American Planning Association,131-144.
7. Chapin, F.,Weiss, S.(1962).Urban Growth Dynamics.New York:John Wiley.
8. Cooter, R.,Ulen, T.(1997).Law and Economics.New York:Addison-Wesley.
9. Evans, A.(1982).The Neutrality of a Development Gains Tax.Public Finance,37(1),119-129.
10. Evans, A.(1987).The Effect of a Development Gains Tax on the Timing of Development.Public Finance,42(2),325-331.
11. Goodchild, R.,Munton, R.(1985).Development and The Landowner: an Analysis of The British Experience.London:Allen and Unwin Press.
12. Guidry, K.,Do, A.(1998).Eminent Domain and Just Compensation for Single-Family Homes.Appraisal Journal,66(3),231-235.
13. Hohm, C.(1983).The Reaction of Landlords to Rent Control.AREUEA Joural,11(4),504-520.
14. Imrie, R.,Thomas, H.(1997).Law, Legal Struggles and Urban Regeneration: Rethinking the Relationships.Urban Studies,34(9),1401-1418.
15. Kaiser, E.,Massie, R.,Weiss, S.,Smith, J.(1968).Predicting the Behaviour of Predevelopment Landowners on The Urban Fringe.American Institute of Planners Journal,34(5),328-333.
16. Kaiser, E.,Weiss, S.(1970).Pubic Policy and The Residential Development Process.American Institute of Planners Journal,26(3),61-63.
17. Lin, T.(1999).Land Owner`s Decision-Making in the Face of Compulsory Purchase.Reading University Economics Discussion Papers,XI(1998/99),1-31.
18. Munch, P.(1976).An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain.Journal of Political Economy,84(3),473-479.
19. Posner, R.(1992).Economic Analysis of Law.Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
20. Weiss, S.,Smith, J.,Kaiser, E.,Kenny, K.(1966).Residential Developer Decisions.Center for Urban and Regional Studies.
21. Witte, A.,Bachman, J.(1978).Vacant Urban Land Holding: Portfolio Consideration and Owner Characteristics.Southern Economic Journal,45(2),543-558.
22. 王慧君、林吉仁、黃明官、廖宜誠(1996)。統計學。台北:高立圖書。
23. 巫慶文(1991)。土地徵收面臨之問題及其因應之道。土地行政，67，10-13。
24. 周良惠(1995)。土地徵收補償基準之經濟分析。台灣地政，107，4-7。
25. 周福星(1983)。統計學。台北:長樂書局。
26. 林享博、陳鵬升(1998)。社區居民爲地方公共財捐獻的意願：以新設國民中學爲例。規劃學報，25，51-70。
27. 林森田(1996)。土地經濟理論與分析。台北:三民書局。
28. 林森田(1989)。土地徵收補償及其爭議之處理。經社法制論叢，3，93-111。
29. 黃宗樂(1991)。土地徵收補償法上若干問題之研討。國立台灣大學法學叢論，21(1)，67-103。
30. 黃怡婷(2002)。政治大學地政學系。
31. 劉祥熹、黃建豪(1999)。從政經觀點論北二高土地徵收補償措施之適當性。經社法制論叢，24，273-309。
32. 鄭龍欽(1992)。台灣土地徵收制度之檢討。經濟前瞻，28，132-136。
33. 謝宏昌、鄧文慧(1999)。論都市計畫過程中民眾利益組成與位置改變：由高雄市內惟埤文化園區特定區計畫剖析民眾參與的本質。成功大學學報第三十四卷人文·社會篇，61-83。