自有住宅市場均衡空屋率分析－以台北縣市爲例

Equilibrium Vacancy Rate of Owner-Occupied Housing Market-The Examples of Taipei City and Taipei County

10.6677/JTLR.200505_8(1).0001

彭建文(Chien-Wen Peng)

房價變動率 ； 空屋率 ； 自然空屋率 ； 均衡空屋率 ； Change of Housing Price ； Vacancy Rate ； Natural Vacancy Rate ； Equilibrium Vacancy Rate

臺灣土地研究

8卷1期（2005 / 05 / 01）

1 - 21

繁體中文

爲能瞭解國內空屋率持續大幅上升，但房價卻調整緩慢的現象，本文中嘗試運用自然空屋率理論來探討自有住宅市場中房價與空屋率的關係，並透過台北市與台北縣1980-2001年的資料估算使房價變動爲零的均衡空屋率。實證結果發現，空屋率與房價變動率之問有顯著的反向關係，但就台北市而言，以當期空屋率對實質住宅單價變動率影響的模型較佳，而台北縣則以前期空屋率對名目住宅總價變動率的影響模型較佳，顯示出台北市與台北縣住宅市場在運作上有明顯的差異。本文推估台北市的均衡空屋率值在12.61%到14.03%之間，台北縣的均衡空屋率值在20.56%到22.72%之間，我們可發現不論台北市與台北縣的均衡空屋率均明顯偏高，且與實際空屋率的高峰值差距不大，此可能是造成兩縣市長期房價漲多跌少，房價調整緩慢的原因。至於自有住宅市場的高均衡空屋率，可能與有相當數量的空屋做爲第二屋使用或暫時閒置，並未在市場參與運作有關。

This paper applied natural vacancy rate theory in rental housing market to clarify the sluggish adjustment process of housing prices to vacancy rate in Taiwan's owner occupied housing market. The empirical results revealed that vacancy rate had very significant negative effect on the change of housing prices. According to the fitness of the model, the current vacancy rate to the real change of housing prices and the lagged vacancy rate to the nominal change of housing total prices is the best model for Taipei City and Taipei County, respectively. It means that the housing market structures of Taipei City and Taipei County are quite different. The estimated equilibrium vacancy rates are about 12.61 to 14.03 percent in Taipei City and 20.56 to 22.72 percent in Taipei County. Both equilibrium vacancy rates are extraordinary high and very close to the peak value of actual vacancy rates. These findings can explain the slow adjustment process in Taiwan's owner occupied housing market quite well.

1. 陳樹衡、林祖嘉、葉家炫(1995)。空屋率的模型選擇及其穩定性：遺傳規畫的應用。住宅學報，3，73-98。
   連結：
2. Blank, D. M.,Winnick, L.(1953).The structure of the Housing Market.Quarterly Journal of Economics,67,181-203.
3. Gabrief, S. A.,Nothaft, F. E.(1988).Rental Housing Market and the natural Vacancy Rate.Journal of the American Real Estate & Urban Economics Association,16(4),419-429.
4. Grenadier, S. R.(1995).Local and National Determinants of Office Vacancies.Journal of Urban Economics,37,57-71.
5. Hendershott, P. H.,Haurin, D. R.(1988).Adjustment in the Real Estate Market.AREUEA Journal,16,343-354.
6. Jud, G. D.,Frew, J. R.(1990).Atypicality and the Natural Vacancy Rate Hypothesis.Journal of the American Real Estate & Urban economics Association,18(3),294-301.
7. Reece, B. F.(1988).The Price-Adjustment Process for Rental Housing: Some Further Evidence.AREUEA Journal,16,411-418.
8. Rosen, K. T.,Smith L. B.(1983).The Price-Adjustment Process for Rental Housing and Natural Vacancy Rate.American Economic Review,73(4),779-786.
9. Sivitanides, Petros S.(1997).The Rent Adjustment Process and the Structural Vacancy Rate in the Commercial Real Estate Market.Journal of Real Estate Research,13(2),195-209.
10. Smith, L. B.(1974).A Note on the Rent Adjustment Mechanism for Rental Housing.American Economic Review,64,478-481.
11. Tse, Y. C. R.,MacGregor, B. D.(1999).Housing Vacancy and Rental Adjustment: Evidence from Hong Kong.Urban Studies,36(10),1769-1782.
12. Voith, R.,Crone, T.(1988).National Vacancy Rates and the Persistence of Shocks in U.S Office Market.Journal of the American Real Estate & Urban Economics Association,16(4),437-458.
13. Wang, K.,Zhuu, Y.(2000).Overbuilding: A Game-Theoretic Approach.Real Estate Economics,28(3),493-522.
14. Wheaton, W. C.,Torto, R. G.(1988).Vacancy Rate and the Future of Office Rent.Journal of the American Real Estate & Urban Economics Association,16(4),430-436.
15. 林祖嘉、張金鶚、彭建文(1994)。台灣地區空屋率與房價調整之均衡分析。八十二年度經濟學門專題計畫研究成果發表會論文選集