地方發展的權力與行動分析：治理性與行動者網絡理論觀點的比較

An Analysis of Power and Action in the Context of Local Development: A Comparison of Governmentality and Actor-Network Theory

10.6677/JTLR.201005_13(1).0005

李承嘉(Chen-Jai Lee)；廖本全(Ben-Chuan Liao)；戴政新(Cheng-Hsin Dai)

白沙屯聚落 ； 地方發展 ； 行動者網絡理論 ； 治理性 ； 香山溼地 ； Bai-Sha-Teun Setllement ； Local Development ； Actor-network Theory ； Governmentality ； Hsiang-Shan Wetland

臺灣土地研究

13卷1期（2010 / 05 / 01）

95 - 133

繁體中文

近年來，因全球化帶來的空間不均衡發展問題，使地方發展的議題越來越受重視。同時，新自由主義的崛起，使地方發展策略產生了重大轉變－即從地方統治轉變為地方治理。針對此一轉變，有二項觀點－治理性(governmentality)與行動者網絡理論(actor-network theory)，常被拿來作為地方發展論述的支撐。在西方先進國家中，這二個觀點都各有實證上的支持，但對於後進民主國家地方發展，還未有足夠相關的討論與研究。因此，本文以台灣二個個案－香山海埔地開發與白沙屯社區發展來觀察與檢驗。結果發現，治理性與行動者網絡各有其解釋能力。不過，作為後進民主國家的台灣，雖然國家試圖透過治理技術進行地方發展的管控，但卻無法擺脫傳統政治經濟力量的干預，使台灣地方發展受到極大的干擾。

The un-equilibrium development in spatial dimension caused by globalization points attention to local development in recent years. Meanwhile, the uprising of neo-liberalism brings about a tremendous shift on the strategies for local development. That is, from local government to local governance and the occurrence of power restructuring between state and local. There are two main discourses, governmentality and actor-network theory (ANT), on the power restructuring between state and local in the context of local development. Both of them are empirically approved in western advanced nations, but not in less advanced nations. This study conducted two case studies on the application of the two discourses to the power operating of local development in Taiwan. The findings show that both of case can well explain the power operation of local development in Taiwan. However, Taiwan as a less advanced country cannot escape from the intervention of traditional political economy. Such intervention results in the distortion of local development, although the government attempts to control the local development by technologies of government.

1. 曾曉強，2004，科學的人類學—考察科學活動的無縫之網，http://www.phil.pku.edu.cn/post/paper/36.htm。
2. 行政院環境保護署，1997，《新竹香山區海埔地造地開發計畫環境影響評估報告書初稿第二次初審會會議記錄》。
3. 行政院環境保護署，2001，《行政院環境保護署環境影響評估審查委員會第七十八次會議記錄》。
4. Amin, A.(Ed.),Thift, N.(Ed.)(1994).Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
5. Amin, A.,Thrift, N.(1995).Institutional Issues for the European Regions: from Markets and Plans to Socioeconomics and Powers of Association.Economy and Society,24(1),41-66.
6. Baradat, L. P.、陳坤森譯、廖揆祥譯、李培元譯(2000)。政治意識形態與近代思潮。台北:韋伯文化事業出版社。
7. Barry, A.(Ed.),Osborne, T.(Ed.),Rose, N.(Ed.)(1996).Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neoliberalism and Rationalities of Government.London:UCL Press.
8. Barry, A.(Ed.),Osborne, T.(Ed.),Rose, N.(Ed.)(1996).Foucaolt and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government.London:UCL Press.
9. Burchell, G.(Ed.),Gordon, C.(Ed.),Miller, P.(Ed.)(1991).The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality.London:Harvester Wheasheaf.
10. Burchell, G.(Ed.),Gordon, C.(Ed.),Miller, P.(Ed.)(1991).The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality.London:Harvester.
11. Burgess, J.,Clark, J.,Harisson, C. M.(2000).Knowledges in Action: an Actor-network Analysis of a Wetland Agri-environment Scheme.Ecological Economics,35,119-132.
12. Cheshire, L.(2009).A Corporate Responsibility? The Constitution of Fly-in, Fly-out Mining Companies as Governance Parteners in Remote, Mine-affected Localities.Journal of Rural Studies
13. Clark, J.,Murdoch, J.(1997).Local Knowledge and the Precarious Extension of Scientific Network: A Reflection on Three Case Studies.Sociologia Rurails,37(1),38-60.
14. Clarke, J.,Newman, J.(1997).The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare.London:Sage.
15. Dean, M.(1999).Governmentality-power Rule in Modern Society.London:Sage.
16. Gunn, S.(2006).From Hegemony to Governmentality: Changing Conceptions of Power in Social History.Journal of Social History,39(3),705-720.
17. Herbert-Cheshire, L.(2003).Translating Policy: Power and Action in Austrialia's Country Towns.Sociologia Ruralis,43(4),454-473.
18. Herbert-Cheshire, L.(2000).Contemporary Strategies for Rural Community Development in Australia: A Governmentality Perspective.Journal of Rural Studies,16,203-215.
19. Herbert-Cheshire, L.,Higgins, V.(2004).From Risky to Responsible: Expert Knowledge and the Governing of Community-led Rural Development.Journal of Rural Studies,20,289-230.
20. Higgins, V.,Lockie, S.(2002).Re-discovering the Social: Neo-liberalism and Hybrid Practices of Hoverning in Rural Natural Resource Management.Journal of Rural Studies,18,419-428.
21. Hoggett, P.(1996).New Modes of Control in the Public Service.Public Administration,74,9-32.
22. Ilbery, B.(Ed.)(1998).The Geography of Rural Change.London:Longman.
23. Jenkins, T. N.(2000).Putting Postmodernity into Practice: Endogenous Development and the Role of Traditional Cultures in the Rural Development of Marginal Regions.Ecological Economics,34,301-314.
24. Jessop, B.(1995).The Regulation Approach, Governance and Post-fordism: Alternative Perspectives on Economic and Political Change?.Economy and Society,24(3),307-333.
25. Knauder, S.(2000).Globalization, Urban Progress, Urban Problems, Rural Disadvantages: Evidence from Mozambique.Aldershot:Ashgate.
26. Knorr-Cetina, K. D.(Ed.),Mulkay, M.(Ed.)(1983).Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science.London:Sage Publications.
27. Kortelainen, J.(1999).The River as an Actor-network: The Finnish Foresee Industry Utilization of Lake and River System.Geoforum,30,235-247.
28. Latour. B.(1987).Science in Action: How to Follow Scientist and Engineers Through Society.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
29. Law, J.(Ed.)(1986).Power, Action, Belief.London:Routledge.
30. Law, J.(Ed.)(1986).Power, Action and Belief: a New Sociology of Knowledge.London:Routeledge & Kegan Paul Henley.
31. MacKinnon, D.(2002).Rural Governance and Local Involvement: Assessing State Community Relations in the Scottish Highlands.Journal of Rural Studies,18,307-324.
32. MacKinnon, D.(2000).Managerialism, Governmentality and the State: A Neo-Foucauldian Approach to Local Economic Governance.Political Geography,19,293-314.
33. Magnani, N.,Struffi, L.(2009).Translation Sociology and Social Capital in Rural Development Initiatives-A Case Study from the Italian Alps.Journal of Rural Studies,25,231-238.
34. Morris, C.(2004).Network of Agri-environmental Policy Implementation: A Case Study of England's Countryside Stewardship Scheme.Land Use Policy,21,177-191.
35. Murdoch, J.(1997).Governmentality and Territoriality: The Statistical Manufacture of Britain's "National Farm".Political Geography,16(4),307-324.
36. Murdoch, J.(2000).Networks-A New Paradigm of Rural Development?.Journal of Rural Studies,16,407-419.
37. Murdoch, J.(1997).Inhuman/ Nonhuman/ Human: Actor-network Theory and the Prospects for a Nondualistic and Symmetrical Perspective on Nature and Society.Environment and Planning D,15,731-756.
38. O''Malley, P.(1996).Indigenous Governance.Economy and Society,25(3),310-336.
39. Parker, G.(2002).Citizenship, Contingency and the Countryside: Rights, Culture, Land and the Environment.London:Routledge.
40. Ray, C.(1999).Endogenous Development in the Era of Reflexive Modernity.Journal of Rural Studies,15(3),257-267.
41. Rodger, K.,Moore, S. A.,Newsome, D.(2009).Wild Tourism, Science and Actor Network Theory.Annals of Tourism Research,36(4),645-666.
42. Rose, N.,Miller, P.(1992).Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government.British Journal of Sociology,42(2),173-205.
43. Roy, A.(2009).Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai.Antipode,41(1),159-179.
44. Sharp, J. S.,Agnitsch, K.,Ryan, V.,Flora, J.(2002).Social Infrastructure and Community Economic Development Strategies: The Case of Self-development and Industrial Recruitment in Rural Iowa.Journal of Rural Studies,18,405-417.
45. Taylor, N.(1998).Urban Planning Theory Science 1945.London:SAGE Publication.
46. Thompson, J.(2005).Inter-institutinal Relations in the Governance of England's National Parks: A Governmentality Perspective.Jounal of Rural Studies,21,323-334.
47. Uitermark, J.(2005).The Genesis and Evolution of Urban Policy: A Confrontation of Regulationist and Governmentality Approaches.Political Geography,24,137-163.
48. Ward, N.,McNichoals, K.(1998).Reconfiguring Rural Development in the UK: Objective 5b and the New Rural Governance.Journal of Rural Studies,14(1),27-39.
49. Winckler, E. A.、Greenhalgh, S.、張苾蕪漢譯(1997)。台灣政治經濟學諸論辯析。台北:人間出版社。
50. Woods, M.(1998).Researching Rural Conflicts: Hunting, Local Politics and Actornetworks.Journal of Rural Studies,14(3),321-340.
51. Zukin, S.(1980).A Decade of the New Urban Sociology.Theory and Society,9(4),575-601.
52. 王佳煌(2005)。都市社會學。台北:三民書局。
53. 李承嘉(2005)。行動者網絡理論應用於鄉村發展之研究—以九份聚落1895-1945年發展為例。地理學報，39，1-30。
54. 李雄略(1998)。香山潮間帶填海造陸案之環評史前史。環耕，12，58-63。
55. 林彥佑(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立政治大學地政研究所。
56. 許文進(2004)。白沙屯漁村文化新風貌計畫白沙屯漁村文化新風貌計畫,苗栗縣:苗栗縣白西社區發展協會。
57. 陳向明(2002)。社會科學值的研究。台北:圖書公司。
58. 陳志南(2004)。白沙屯社區總體營造之實務與經驗。2004 推展漁村社區總體營造研討會論文集
59. 陳志南主編(2003)。白沙屯誌：苗栗縣白沙屯媽祖信仰圈文史調查報告。苗栗縣:苗栗縣白西社區發展協會。
60. 黃麗明(2003)。藝術山海．劇場之村：通霄鎮白沙屯地區社區總體營造心點子創意構想期末報告書。苗栗縣:黃麗明建築師事務所。
61. 楊綠茵(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹，國立清華大學社會人類學研究所。
62. 魏美莉(2001)。打造海洋新故鄉。

1. Cheng-Yun Tsang(2023)。A Study on Digitalization of Financial Supervision: An Actor-Network Analysis of Taiwan's Internet-only Bank Supervisory System。管理評論，42(2)，95-109。
2. 藍麗花,張秦瑞,孫同文(2021)。縣政治理：大學之角色與職能。中國地方自治，74(9)，36-60。
3. 林宜珍(2020)。臺北機廠保存與國家鐵道博物館籌備初期過程初探－行動者網絡理論視角的文化資產再生個案分析。博物館學季刊，34(3)，35-61。
4. 吳連賞,朱芳慧(2021)。東港石斑魚產業之產銷網絡發展分析。華岡地理學報，33，12-33。
5. 臧正運(2023)。金融監理數位化之研究：我國純網銀監理系統建置的行動者網絡分析。管理評論，42(2)，23-39。
6. (2019)。臺灣的學仕化議題：建構在仕紳化三個世代的研究。臺灣教育社會學研究，19(1)，91-143。
7. (2023)。土地徵收的再審視：生活世界的視角。台灣社會研究季刊，124，97-158。