引用文獻分析在健康科學館藏經費分配之應用：以臺北醫學大學圖書館為例

The Application of Citation Analysis to Budget Allocation in Health Sciences Collection: A Case Study of the Taipei Medical University Library

10.6182/jlis.2004.2(1).019

邱子恆(Tzu-Heng Chiu)

引文分析 ； 醫學圖書館 ； 館藏發展 ； Citation analysis ； Medical Libraries ； Collection development

圖書資訊學刊

2卷1期（2004 / 06 / 01）

19 - 33

繁體中文

本研究以臺北醫學大學90與91學年度的博碩士論文為對象，分析其文末的參考文獻，計算被引用的文獻之資料類型、語文別、文獻篇數，以探索健康科學相關學科引用文獻之模式，並比較其與國外相關研究之異同。研究結果發現，臺北醫學大學各學院的學位論文，在引用各資料類型文獻的模式上相當一致，引用次數都是依序為期刊、圖書、其他、網路資源；而在引用文獻的語文別方面，亦都是偏好使用外文資料。另外，在圖書館資料可得性方面，臺北醫學大學圖書館的期刊資料可得性，在中文與外文期刊方面都是六成左右，而圖書資料方面，中文(46.77%)與外文(29.14%)就有近18個百分點的差異。最後在期刊與圖書資料之經費分配方面，本次研究結果發現，北醫大的各學院學位論文的期刊與圖書資料的引用比為88.5:11.5，而圖書館的實際執行採購經費亦是接近此比例。

This study explores the citation pattern of health science related subjects, using the theses and dissertations in 90 and 91 academic years of TMU as the research samples. Findings of this study can not only provide information for decision making of budget allocation in TMU library, but also serve as the reference for other medical universities and colleges in Taiwan. Findings of this study has found that the theses and dissertations of colleges in TMU present identical citation patterns, following the order of ”journal-monograph-others internet resources” as well as preferring foreign languages as the language used in citations. Furthermore, in terms of the availability of library materials, the availability of Chinese and foreign language journals in TMU library is about 60% whereas there is 18% difference between Chinese (46.77%) and foreign language (29.14%) monograph collection. Finally, in terms of the budget allocations for journals and monograph collection, the results from this study reveal the percentages of the use of journal and monograph collection as citations in theses and dissertations of colleges in TMU are 88.5:11.5. The actual execution of purchase budget in TMU library is about this percentage.

1. 臺灣地區醫學圖書館館藏暨服務統計共建共享系統
2. Burdick, Amrita J.,Butler, Anne,Sullivan, Marilyn G.(1993).Citation Patterns in the Health Sciences: Implications for Serials/Monographic Fund Allocation.Bulletin of the Medical Library Association,81(1)
3. Dervin, Robin B.,Kellogg, Martha(1990).The Serial/Monograph Ratio in Research Libraries: Budgeting in Light of Citation Studies.College and Research Libraries,51
4. Kyrillidou, Martha,Young, Mark(2003).ARL Academic Health Sciences Library Statistics 2001-02.
5. Mueller, D. A.,Stinson, E. R.(1980).Survey of Health Professionals’ Information Habits and Needs: Conducted through Personal Interviews.The Journal of the American Medical Association,243(2)
6. Sherwood, KK(1932).Relative Value of Medical Magazines.Northwest Medicine,31(6)
7. Wehmeyer, Jeffrey M.,Wehmeyer, Susan(1999).The Comparative Importance of Books: Clinical Psychology in the Health Sciences Library.Bulletin of the Medical Library Association,87(2)
8. Worel, Sunny Lynn(2004).Brief Communications: Journal-Citation-Seeking Behavior at Two Health Sciences Libraries.Journal of the Medical Library Association,92(1)
9. 吳張蕙美(1998)。大學圖書館使用者調查：以交通大學圖書館為例。教育資料與圖書館學，36(2)
10. 卓玉聰(2004)。2003中華民國圖書館年鑑。
11. 林愉珊(2003)。紙本和電子期刊的抉擇。上課投影片。

1. 黃明居、吳東陽(2014)。圖書館電子資源之加值應用以引用文獻分析系統之建置為例。圖書館學與資訊科學，40(1)，66-81。
2. 簡素真,陳俐卉(2020)。以引文分析探討期刊館藏之學術研究支援度：以國立成功大學圖書館為例。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，29，59-87。
3. (2012)。引用文獻分析為基礎的多評準期刊評選模式之研究。圖書館學與資訊科學，38(2)，52-70。