從專利分析看台日韓遺傳工程研究之發展

Development of Genetics Engineering Research of Taiwan, Japan and Korea via Patent Bibliometric Approach

10.6182/jlis.2005.2(3.4).045

羅思嘉(Szu-Chia Lo)

遺傳工程專利 ； 專利分析

圖書資訊學刊

2卷3&4期（2005 / 03 / 01）

45 - 57

繁體中文

本研究分析1,048件台日韓三國所屬的遺傳工程專利以及14,140引用文獻，以了解台日韓三國在遺傳工程研究的發展狀況。研究中作者針對1,048件台日韓專利以及引用文獻進行計量分析，進行之分析包括研究產出、專利權人之布萊德福法則分析、專利與非專利引用分析以及專利聚合等。專利數計算的結果顯示，台日韓三國在遺傳工程研究的生產力或是影響力居於亞洲主導地位，其中日本為三國之冠。掌握相關技術的重要機構亦多為日本機構。從三國專利所引用的文獻以及被引文獻所屬地區分析，台日韓三國遺傳工程的發展受到美國研究相當程度的影響，其次為該國境內之研究。從科學研究與技術發展區分，科學研究對於三國遺傳工程技術的發展都有長足的影響力；專利聚合的分析結果則顯示主要研究機構之間存在技術關連集群。

In this study, the author analyzed 1,048 USPTO patents granted to Taiwan, Japan and Korea by taking bibliometrics approach to reveal the development of Genetics Engineering Research in the leading three countries in Asia. The author applied the methods adopted from bibliometrics such as the research growth, analysis based on Bradford Law, citation analysis and patent coupling to analyze the 1,048 patents and 14,140 cited references. The results show that Japan is the leading country among three countries. The primary assignees were mainly based in Japan. Besides the research growth, the author also investigated the impact on the research progress. From geographic point of view, U.S. had significant impact on the technology development. Comparing public science and technology development, researches done in both sectors had high influence, but public science showed more research impact than private sector did by the numbers of citations. By the analysis result of the patent coupling, four technological clusters were identified.

1. Albert, Armando,Plaza, Luis M.(2004).The transfer of knowledge from the Spanish public R & D system to the productive sectors in the field of biotechnology.59(1),3-14.
2. Allen, J.,Oppenheim, C..The overlap of US and Canadian patents literature with journal literature.World Potent information,1979(1),77.
3. Allen, J.,Oppenheim, C.(1979).The overlap of US and Canadian patents literature with journal literature.1(2),77-80.
4. Banerjee, P.,Gupta, B. M.,Garg, K. C.(2000).Patent statistics as indicators of competition: an analysis of patenting in biotechnology.47(1),95-116.
5. Banerjee, P.,Gupta, B. M.,Garg, K. C..Patent statistics as indicators of competition: an analysis of patenting in biotechnology.Scientometrics,2000(47),95.
6. Camp, R.C..Scientomeric.Milwaukee:Quality Press.
7. Demidowicz, B. K.,Oppenheim, C.(1981).The overlap of patent and journal literature on animal feedstuffs.3,82-83.
8. Demidowicz, B. K.,Oppenheim, C..The overlap of patent and journal literature on animal feedstuffs.World Patent Information,1981,82.
9. Eisenschitz, T. S.,Lazard, A. M.,Willey, C. J.(1986).Patent groups and their relationship with journal literature.12,53-58.
10. Eisenschitz, T. S.,McKie, L. J.,Warne, K.(1989).Communication of information in U.S. biotechnology patents.11(1),28-32.
11. Garfield, F.(1979).Citation indexing: its theory and application in science.New York:Wiley.
12. Garfield, F..Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, Technology and the Humanities.New York:Wiley.
13. Gittelman, Michelle,Kogut, Bruce(2003).Does goods science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns.49(4),366-382.
14. Karki, M. M. S.(1997).Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool.33(4),269-272.
15. Lo, Szu-Chia(2004).A Study of the Productivity of Genetic Engineering Research from 1991 to 2002 Using the Patentometrics Approach.India:
16. Lo, Szu-Chia.A Study of the Productivity of Genetic Engineering Research from 1991 to 2002 Using the Patentometrics Approach.International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Fifth COLLNET Meeting,India:
17. Lopez-Monoz,Francisco,Alamo,Cecilio,Rbio,Gabriel,Garcia-Garcia,Pilar,Martin-Agueda,Belen,Cuenca,Eduardo.Bibliometric analysis of biomedical publications on SSRI during 1980-2000.Depression and Anxiety,2003(18),95.
18. Lopez-Munoz, Francisco,Alamo, Cecilio,Rbio, Gabriel,Garcia-Garcia, Pilar,Martin-Agueda, Belen,Cuenca, Eduardo(2003).Bibliometric analysis of biomedical publications on SSRI during 1980-2000.18(2),95-103.
19. Malo, S.,Geuna, A.(2000).Sciencetechnology linkages in an emerging research platform: the case of combinatorial chemistry and biology.47(2),303-321.
20. Malo, S.,Geuna, A..Science-technology linkages in an emerging research platform: the case of combinatorial chemistry and biology.Scientometrics,2000(47),303.
21. McMillan, G. Steven,Hamilton, Robert D.(2000).Using Bibliometrics to Measure Firm Knowledge: an analysis of the US Pharmaceutical Industry.12(4),465-475.
22. Moed, Henk F..Bibliometric indicators reflect publication and management strategies.Scientometrics,2000(47),323.
23. Moed, Henk F.(2000).Bibliometric indicators reflect publication and management strategies.47(2),323-346.
24. Narin, F.(1994).Patent bibliometrics.30(1),147-155.
25. Narin, F.(1995).Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output.34(3),489-496.
26. Narin, F..Patent bibliometrics.Scientometrics,1994(30),147.
27. Narin, F.,Olivastro, D.,Stevens, K. A.(1994).Bibliometric/theory practice and problems.18(1),65-76.
28. Narin, Francis,Hamilton, Kimberly S.,Olivastro, Dominic(1997).The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science.26(3),317-330.
29. Ramani, Shyama V.,Looze, Marie-Angele de(2002).Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biotechnology sector: an application to France, Germany and the U.K..54(3),319-346.
30. Ramani, Shyama V.,Looze, Marie-Angele de.Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biotechnology sector: an application to France, Germany and the U.K.Scientometrics,2002(54),319.
31. Walker, R. D.(1995).Metuchen, N.J.:The Scarecrow Press.
32. Walker, R. U..Patents as Scientific and Technical Literature,1995

1. (2009)。專利指標發展研究。圖書館學與資訊科學，35(2)，88-106。