由巨磁阻相關文獻探究科學與技術間的互動

An Investigation of the Interaction between Science and Technology from Literatures of Giant Magnetoresistance

10.6182/jlis.2009.7(1.2).053

黃元鶴(Yuan-Ho Huang)

非專利參考文獻 ； 引文分析 ； 科學連結 ； 技術連結 ； Non-patent references ； Citation analysis ； Science Linkage ； Technology Linkage

圖書資訊學刊

7卷1&2期（2009 / 12 / 01）

53 - 76

繁體中文

本研究由巨磁阻之科學文獻與專利文件來觀察科學與技術間互動，樣本資料包括1030件專利引用之1603篇非專利參考文獻，以及3287篇科學文獻所引用之160件次的專利進行分析。結果顯示科學文獻僅佔所有技術文件之參考文獻的10%，而僅約4%的科學文獻曾引用代表技術的專利文件。時間差四年內的科學文獻被專利文件引用比率較高，然部份時間差十年的專利仍被科學文獻引用。物理、工程、化學與電腦等主題是較常被專利引用的主題，而半導體裝置、磁體或電感及變壓器相關的專利則較常被科學文獻所引用。

This study focused on the interaction between science and technology of Giant Magnetoresistance (GMR) from both scientific literatures and patent documents. The sample data included 1603 nonpatent references (NPRs) from 1030 patents and 160 patent documents cited by 3287 scientific literatures. The result shows that the scientific literature amounts to 10 percent of all references cited by technical documents. On the other hand, only 4 percent of the scientific literature had cited the patent documents. The time lags between patent application and paper publication from the NPRs are mostly within 4 years. However, some patents which have been issued 10 years ago were still cited by scientific literatures. Subjects including physics, engineering, chemistry and computer are mostly cited by GMR patent documents, while technologies related to semiconductor devices, magnets inductances and transformers are mostly cited by GMR scientific literatures.

1. The Nobel Foundation (2007). Nanotechnology gives sensitive read-out heads for compact hard disks. Retrieved August 15, 2009, from http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2007/press.html
2. Baibich, M. N.,Broto, J. M.,Fert, A.,Nguyen van Dau, F.,Petroff, F.,Eitenne, P.,Creuzet, G.,Friederich, A.,Chazelas, J.(1988).Giant Magnetoresistance of (001)Fe/(001)Cr Magnetic Superlat-tices.Physical Review Letters,61,2472-2475.
3. Binasch, G.,Grunberg, P.,Saurenbach, F.,Zinn, W.(1989).Enhanced magnetoresistance in layered magnetic structures with antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange.Physical Review B,39,4828-4830.
4. Gao, X.,Guan, J.(2009).Network of scientific journals: an exploration of Chinese patent data.Scientometrics,80(1),283-302.
5. Glänzel, W.,Meyer, M.(2003).Patent cited in the scientific literature: an exploratory study of 'reverse' citation relations.Scientometrics,58(2),415-428.
6. Lo, S. S.(2009).Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: a case of genetic engineering research.Scientometrics,82(1),109-120.
7. Meyer, M.(2000).Does science push technology? Patent citing scientific literature.Research Policy,29,409-434.
8. Meyer, M.(2001).Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: an exploration of nano-science and nano-technology.Scientometrics,51(1),163-183.
9. Narin, F.,Hamilton, K. S.,Olivastro, D.(1997).The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science.Research Policy,26,317-330.
10. Narin, F.,Noma, E.(1985).Is technology becoming science?.Scientometrics,7(3-6),369-381.
11. Price, D. J. de Solla(1965).Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography.Journal of Technology and Culture,6,553-568.
12. Verbeek, A.(2001).Linking science to technology: using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes.Scientometrics,54(3),399-420.
13. 章效鋒(2006)。清晰的奈米世界：初探電子顯微鏡。臺北市=Taipei:五南=We-Nan Book Co. Ltd.。
14. 黃榮俊、許峻瑜(2007)。2007諾貝爾物理獎專題報導：巨磁阻效應之物理原理與應用。成大研發快訊，1(9)