Longitudinal Trends in Internationalisation, Collaboration Types, and Citation Impact: A Bibliometric Analysis of Seven LIS Journals (1980-2008)

10.6182/jlis.2011.9(1).027

Sei-Ching Joanna Sin

Bibliometrics ； LIS Journals ； Internationalisation of Science ； Citation Impact ； Collaboration

圖書資訊學刊

9卷1期（2011 / 06 / 01）

27 - 49

英文

Journal publication is a core avenue for sharing research in the LIS field. Effective scholarly communication is beneficial to the growth of a discipline. Bibliometrics research shows that articles in prestigious international journals are predominantly those of authors based in a few nations, however. Papers from authors outside the established nations are likely to be cited less often. This study analysed the longitudinal changes in geographical patterns of authorship, collaboration types, and factors affecting the citation impact of seven top LIS journals over a period of 29 years. In addition to data from all nations, this paper includes specific findings relating to Asian countries. Analysis of 8,140 papers shows that the internationalisation level in the sample set has increased in terms of number of nations represented and in a decreasing Gini coefficient. The presence of Asian nations such as Taiwan and Singapore as top contributing countries is particularly notable in the past 10 years. Domestic collaboration is found to be the dominant type of authorship pattern. In terms of citation impact as measured by citation counts, logistic regression was used to test the effects of author continent, country income level, collaboration type, publication year, and number of authors. Papers from lower-income countries or from Asian or European authors are found less likely to be 'more cited.' International and domestic collaboration had a positive relation with citation counts. A practical implication is that authors may consider international collaboration as a way to increase the visibility and impact of their research. Nevertheless, the reasons behind such differential citation impact require more exploration. Invisible colleges, the strengths of weak ties, and the geographic scope of a paper are some factors to be further examined. It is hoped that more research can help identify and overcome barriers in scholarly communication so as to achieve a genuine internationalisation of science.

1. World Bank. (2010). How we classify countries. Retrieved Sept 27, 2010, from http://data.worldbank.org/about/countryclassifications
2. Akre, O.,Barone-Adesi, F.,Pettersson, A.,Pearce, N.,Merletti, F.,Richiardi, L.(2011).Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: Do they reflect.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,65(2),119-123.
3. Borgman, C. L. (Ed.)(1990).Scholarly communication and bibliometrics.Newbury Park:Sage.
4. Bottle, R. T.,Efthimiadis, E. N.(1984).Library and information science literature: Authorship and growth patterns.Journal of Information Science,9(3),107-116.
5. Buttlar, L.(1991).Analyzing the library periodical literature - content and authorship.College & Research Libraries,52(1),38-53.
6. Chua, A. Y. K.,Yang, C. C.(2008).The shift towards multi-disciplinarity in informationscience.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,59(13),2156-2170.
7. Cole, J. R.,Cole, S.(1973).Social stratification in science.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
8. Cronin, B.,Shaw, D.(1999).Citation, funding acknowledgement and author nationality relationships in four information science journals.Journal of Documentation,55(4),402-408.
9. Dahdouh-Guebas, F.,Ahimbisibwe, J.,Van Moll, R.,Koedam, N.(2003).Neocolonial science by the most industrialised upon the least developed countries in peer-reviewed publishing.Scientometrics,56(3),329-343.
10. Dijk, V.(2005).The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
11. Dore, J. C.,Ojasoo, T.,Okubo, Y.,Durand, T.,Dudognon, G.,,Miquel, J. F.(1996).Correspondence factor analysis of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981-1992.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,47(8),588-602.
12. Egghe, L.,Rousseau, R.,Van Hooydonk, G.(2000).Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences Consequences for evaluation studies.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,51(2),145-157.
13. Frame, J. D.,Carpenter, M. P.(1979).International research collaboration.Social Studies of Science,9(4),481-497.
14. Frame, J. D.,Narin, F.,Carpenter, M. P.(1977).Distribution of world science.Social Studies of Science,7(4),501-516.
15. Glanzel, W.(2002).Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies.Library Trends,50(3),461-473.
16. Gutierrez, J.,Lopez-Nieva, P.(2001).Are international journals of human geography really international?.Progress in Human Geography,25(1),53-69.
17. Harsanyi, M. A.(1993).Multiple authors, multiple problems bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration - a literaturereview.Library & Information Science Research,15(4),325-354.
18. He, S. Y.,Spink, A.(2002).A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,53(11),953-959.
19. Huang, M.-H.,Lin, C.-S.(2010).International collaboration and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity.Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting
20. Katz, J.,Hicks, D.(1997).How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model.Scientometrics,40(3),541-554.
21. Koehler, W.(2001).Information science as "Little science": The implications of a bibliometric analysis of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science.Scientometrics,51(1),117-132.
22. Levitt, J. M.,Thelwall, M.(2009).Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(3),434-442.
23. Liang, L. M.,Feng, Y.,Wu, Y. S.(2000).Shifts in the world science centre: Spacetime characteristics and disciplinary analysis.Interdisciplinary Science Reviews,25(3),227-232.
24. Lipetz, B. A.(1999).Aspects of JASIS authorship through five decades.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,50(11),994-1003.
25. Menard, S. W.(2002).Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks:Sage.
26. Moed, H. F.(2005).Citation analysis in research evaluationCitation analysis in research evaluation.Dordrecht:Springer.
27. Mukherjee, B.(2010).Assessing Asian scholarlyscholarly research in library and information science: A quantitative view as reflected in Web of knowledge.The Journal of Academic Librarianship,36(1),90-101.
28. Nisonger, T. E.(2005).The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors: A replication of the Kohl-Davis study.College and Research Libraries,66(4),341-377.
29. Persson, O.(2010).Are highly cited papers more international?.Scientometrics,83(2),397-401.
30. Price, D. J. de Solla.(1986).Little Science, Big Science – and Beyond.New York:Columbia University Press.
31. Pritchard, A.(1969).Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?.Journal of Documentation,25(4),348-349.
32. Rey-Rocha, J.,Martin-Sempere, M. J.(2004).Patterns of the foreign contributions in some domestic vs. international journals on Earth Sciences.Scientometrics,59(1),95-115.
33. Sawyer, S.,Eschenfelder, K. R.(2002).Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and trends.Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,36,427-465.
34. Seglen, P. O.(1992).The skewness of science.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,43(9),628-638.
35. Sin, S.-C. J.(2005).Are library and information science journals becoming more internationalized? A longitudinal study of authors' geographical affiliations in 20 lis journals from 1981 to 2003.Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
36. Uzun, A.(2004).Assessing internationality of scholarly journals through foreign authorship patterns: The case of major journals in information science, and scientometrics.Scientometrics,61(3),457-465.
37. Uzun, A.(2002).Library and information science research in developing countries and Eastern European countries: A brief bibliometric perspective.International Information & Library Review,34(1),21-33.
38. Wagner, C. S.,Leydesdorff, L.(2005).Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science.Research Policy,34(10),1608-1618.
39. Wormell, I.(1998).Informetric analysis of the international impact of scientific journals: How 'international' are the international journals?.Journal of Documentation,54(5),584-605.
40. Zitt, M.,Perrot, F.,Barre, R.(1998).The transition from "National" to "Transnational" Model and related measures of countries' performance.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,49(1),30-42.
41. Zitt,M.,Bassecoulard,E.(1998).Internationalization of scientific journals: A measurement based on publication and citation scope.Scientometrics,41(1-2),255-271.

1. (2011).Towards an Asian Vision of Library and Information Research.圖書館學與資訊科學,37(2),4-19.
2. (2021).Science mapping in the research of higher education internationalisation from 2013 to 2018 in Asia: publications, regional networking and future trends.高教評鑑與發展,15(1),35-52.