以關注本位採用模式探討大學教師參與開放式課程之研究

A Study of University Faculty's Participation in OpenCourseWare: From the Perspective of the Concerns-Based Adoption Model

10.6182/jlis.2012.10(1).117

馬郁凝(Yuh-Ning Ma)；柯皓仁(Hao-Ren Ke)

開放式課程 ； 開放式教育資源 ； 關注本位採用模式 ； 關注階層 ； 使用階段 ； OpenCourseWare ； Open Educational Resources ； Concerns-Based Adoption Model ； Stages of Concern ； Levels of Use

圖書資訊學刊

10卷1期（2012 / 06 / 01）

117 - 153

繁體中文

本研究透過半結構訪談法，以臺灣師範大學為場域，探討大學教師參與開放式課程錄製的過程、教師為參與開放式課程所做的改變、教師參與開放式課程之困難與期望，並進一步利用關注本位採用模式（Concerns-Based Adoption Model，CBAM）分析受訪者參與開放式課程之使用階段。研究結果顯示：提供學生補課/複習管道和增加教學對象是教師參與開放式課程錄製之主要目的；教師會選擇課程內容適合拍攝、具有公開傳播價值以及教師本身對課程內容熟悉且教材準備完善的課程進行開放式課程的錄製；教師參與開放式課程的過程中會為了配合課程錄製以及加深開放式課程對於學生的影響而做出改變。教師對於開放式課程的建議包含增加參與誘因、改善錄製和後製方式、進行使用者調查、傳承課程錄製經驗等。

This study explored faculty participation in OpenCourseWare (OCW) in the National Taiwan Normal University. Employing the concern-based adoption model and semi-structured interviewing, this study analyzed the concerns and use of eleven faculty members who had participated in the OCW program. The findings showed that the instructors participated mainly to share courses with the general public and to improve student learning. As to which courses were suitable for OCW, instructors considered the appropriateness of a course for video recording, whether it was of value and interest to the general public, and whether the course was well prepared for the open nature of OCW. The participating instructors adjusted themselves as well as the course content to better accommodate the OCW production and to foster student learning. Expectations for the OCW project included better incentives for participation, improving the recording and production quality, conducting user surveys, and more experience sharing opportunities among OCW participants.

1. 謝惠雯(2010)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所=Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies, National Taiwan Normal University。
   連結：
2. Opensource Opencourseware Prototype System. (2005). 2005 online survey report. Retrieved from http://www.myoops.org/twocw/Global/oops/survey/index.htm
3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, OpenCourseWare. (2009). 2009 program evaluation findings summary. Retrieved from http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/09_Eval_Summary.pdf
4. Opensource Opencourseware Prototype System. (n.d.). About OOPS. Retrieved from http://www.myoops.org/
5. National Taiwan Normal University OpenCourseWare.（2010）。國立臺灣師範大學開放式課程─課程網站新聞NTNU OpenCourseWare-[ke cheng wang zhan xin wen]。檢自Retrieved from http://ocw.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/
6. National Taiwan Normal University OpenCourseWare.（n.d.）。國立臺灣師範大學開放式課程─課程類別NTNU OpenCourseWare-[ke cheng lei bie]。檢自Retrieved from http://ocw.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/
7. Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Retrieved from http://www.oerderves.org/
8. Taiwan OpenCourseWare Consortium. (n.d.). About TOCWC. Retrieved from http://www.tocwc.org.tw/about.php
9. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Open CourseWare . ( n . d . ) . M I T Opencourseware. Retrieved from http://ocw.mit.edu/about/
10. OpenCourseWare Consortium. (n.d.). What is OpenCourseWare. Retrieved from http://www.ocwconsortium.org/en/aboutus/whatisocw
11. Abelson, H.(2008).The creation of OpenCourseWare at MIT.Journal of Science Education and Technology,17(2),164-174.
12. Anderson, S. E.(1997).Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model.Curriculum Inquiry,27(3),331-367.
13. Carson, S.(2009).The unwalled garden: Growth of the OpenCourse Ware consortium, 2001-2008.Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning,24(1),23-29.
14. Ellsworth, J. B.(2000).Surviving change: A survey of educational change models.Syracuse, NY:ERIC clearinghouse on information and technology.
15. Fuller, F. F.(1969).Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization.American Educational Research Journal,6(2),207-226.
16. Hall, G. E.,George, A. A.,Rutherford, W. L.(1977).Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for the use of the SoC Questionnaire.Austin, TX:Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, the University of Texas at Austin.
17. Hall, G. E.,Loucks, S. F.(1977).A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented.American Educational Research Journal,14(3),263-276.
18. Hall, G. E.,Wallace, R. C.,Dossett, W. F.(1973).A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within education institutions.Austin, TX:Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, the University of Texas at Austin.
19. Hord, S. M.,Rutherford, W. L.,Huling-Austing, L.,Hall, G. E.(1987).Taking charge of change.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2007).Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources.
21. Roach, A. T.,Kratochwill, T. R.,Frank, J. L.(2009).School-Based consultants as change facilitators: Adaptation of the Concerns-Based adoption model (CBAM) to support the implementation of research-based practices.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,19(4),300-320.
22. 尹弘颷、李子建(2008)。課程變革：理論與實踐。臺北市=Taipei:高等教育=HEDU。
23. 王令宜、高熏芳(1995)。關切階層量表在教學科技創新推廣上的運用。視聽教育雙月刊，37(1)，5-13。
24. 李海碩(2010)。新竹=Hsin Chu，國立交通大學教育研究所=Institute of Education National Chiao Tong University。
25. 高熏芳(1993)。從「顧慮階段」的發展看教師的學習成長。視聽教育雙月刊，34(5)，39-44。
26. 張善培(1998)。課程實施程度的測量。教育學報，26(1)，149-170。
27. 陳昊漢(2009)。國立臺灣師範大學開放式課程之設計與實作。網路社會學通訊，78

1. Lin, Ming-Chia,Lin, Eric S.(2017).The Role of Learning Antecedents and Quality in Predicting OpeCourseWare Utility: Preliminary Evidence From University and Public Learners.數位學習科技期刊,9(1),71-104.
2. 陳明聰、江俊漢(2016)。從教師觀點談大學建立全方位設計學習環境的可能性。特殊教育季刊，140，19-27。
3. 潘慧玲、洪祥瑀(2018)。學習共同體變革歷程中的教師關注。課程與教學，21(3)，145-168。
4. (2013)。高等教育コンテンツのオープン化―OCW を中心に―。應用外語學報，20，97-111。