英文摘要
|
This article attempts to examine the Mobian (墨辯; the Mohist Dialectical) from the perspective of classification theory. The Mobian comprises six texts, which form chapters 40 through 45 of the extant Mozi (墨子), including Jing-shang (經上; Canon I), Jing-xia (經下; Canon II), Jingshuo-shang (經說上; Explanation to Canon I), Jingshuo-xia (經說下; Explanation to Canon II), Daqu (大取; Greater Selections), and Xiaoqu (小取; Lesser Selections). The Mobian is commonly recognized as a classic and treasure for the logic of ancient China. Therefore, most scholars explore the book assuming a logical or philosophical perspective. The current investigation, however, is focused on thoughts and issues related to classification as revealed in the Mobian. The result of the preliminary study shows that Mobian can and should be viewed as a treasure for classification study of ancient China. There exists numerous thoughtful discussions related to classification issues, including perception and cognition (i.e., the foundation of classifying), the three laws of thought and the principle of rationality, concept definitions, categorization, names and objects, sameness and difference, and classifying and inferring methods. The results guarantee further examination of the Mobian and suggest that we may employ a similar approach to investigate the writings of the Pre-Qin philosophers.
|
参考文献
|
-
范耕研(1934)。墨辯疏證。上海市:商務印書館。【Fan, Geng-Yan (1934). [Mo Bian shu zheng]. Shanghai, China: The Commercial Press. (in Chinese)】
-
Bliss, H. E. (1929). The organization of knowledge and the system of the sciences. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
-
伍非百(1922)。墨辯定名答客問。學藝,4(2),2-4。【Wu, Fei-Bai (1922). [Mo Bian ding ming da ke wen]. [Xue Yi], 4(2), 2-4. (in Chinese)】
-
Saye r s, W. C. B. (1944). A manual of classification for librar ians and bibliographers (2nd ed.). London, England: Grafton. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/manualofclassifi007579mbp
-
Jespersen, O. (1922). Language: Its nature, development and origin. London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
-
Richardson, E. C. (1930). Classification: Theoretical and practical (3rd ed.). New York, NY: H. W. Wilson. Retrieved from https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015034800279; page=root;seq=23;view=image;size=100;orient=0
-
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2017). Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) (2016 ed.). Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2016-en.pdf
-
Cutter, C. A. (1904). Rules for a printed dictionary catalog (4th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S Government Printing Office.
-
Bod, R.,Richards, L.(Trans.)(2015).A new history of the humanities: The search for principles and patterns from antiquity to the present.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
-
Bowker, G. C.,Star, S. L.(1999).Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
-
Dahlberg, I.(1989).Concept and definition theory.Classification theory in the computer age: Conversations across disciplines,Albany, NY:
-
Frické, M.(2012).Logic and the organization of information.New York, NY:Springer.
-
Hlava, M. M. K.(2015).The taxobook: History, theories and concepts of knowledge organization. Part 1 of a 3-part series.San Rafael, CA:Morgan & Claypool.
-
Iyer, H.(1995).Classificatory structures: Concepts, relations and representation.Frankfurt/Main, Germany:Indeks Verlag.
-
Johnstan, I.(2010).The Mozi: A complete translation.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
-
Kumar, K.(1988).Theory of classification.New Delhi, India:Vikas House.
-
Lakoff, G.(1987).Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveals about the mind.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
-
Melamed, Y. Y.,Lin, M.(2016).Principle of sufficient reason.The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy
-
Ranganathan, S. R.(1967).Prolegomena to library classification.Bombay, India:Asia Publishing House.
-
Saussure, F. D.,Baskin, W.(Trans.)(1974).Course in general linguistics.London, England:Fontana/Collins.
-
Sokal, R.(1974).Classification: Purposes, principles, progress, prospects.Science,185(4157),1115-1123.
-
Svenonius, E.(2000).The intellectual foundation of information organization.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
-
Zadeh, L. A.(1965).Fuzzy sets.Information and Control,8(3),338-353.
-
Zerubavel, E.(1993).The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago.
-
王冬珍(1989)。墨學新探。臺北市=Taipei:世界書局=The World Book。
-
王加良(2012)。天津市=Tianjin, China,南開大學=Nankai University。
-
王讚源編(2011)。墨經正讀。上海市=Shanghai, China:上海科學技術文獻出版社=Shanghai Scientific & Technological Literature Publishing House。
-
王讚源(2015)。墨子。臺北市=Taipei:東大圖書=Tung Da Books。
-
任繼愈(1956)。墨子。上海市=Shanghai, China:人民出版社=People's Publishing House。
-
安育瑭(2015)。臺北市=Taipei,國立臺灣大學哲學研究所=Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University。
-
朱志凱(1988)。墨經中的邏輯學說。成都市=Chengdu, China:四川人民出版社=Sichuan People's Publishing House。
-
何光國(1990)。圖書資訊組織原理。臺北市=Taipei:三民書局=San Min Book。
-
冷伏海編、徐躍全編、馮璐編(2008)。信息組織概論。北京市=Beijing, China:科學出版社=Science Press。
-
吾淳(2014)。中國哲學起源的知識線索:從遠古到老子:自然觀念及自然哲學的發展與成型。上海市=Shanghai, China:上海人民出版社=Shanghai People's Publishing House。
-
吳毓江(1993)。墨子校注。北京市=Beijing, China:中華書局=Zhonghua Book。
-
李建華(1991)。《墨辯》論類的本質和作用。湘潭師範學院學報,12(1),37-41。
-
李紹崑(1990)。墨學十講。臺北市=Taipei:水牛出版社=Buffalo Book。
-
李漁叔(1968)。墨辯新注。臺北市=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press。
-
沈有鼎(1980)。墨經的邏輯學。北京市=Beijing, China:中國社會科學出版社=China Social Sciences Press。
-
汪奠基(1985)。中國邏輯思想史料分析。新竹市=Hsinchu:仰哲=Yang Zhe。
-
谷振詣(2001)。論《墨經》的“類”概念。中國青年政治學院學報,20(1),57-60。
-
周山編(2010)。中國傳統思維方法研究。上海市=Shanghai, China:學林=Xuelin Publishing House。
-
周山(1988)。中國邏輯史論。瀋陽市=Shenyang, China:遼寧教育出版社=Liaoning Education Press。
-
周富美(1985)。墨辯與墨學。臺大中文學報,1,187-231。
-
周雲之(1993)。墨經校注‧今譯‧研究—墨經邏輯學。蘭州市=Lanzhou, China:甘肅人民出版社=Gansu People's Publishing House。
-
周雲之、劉培育(1982)。先秦邏輯史。北京市=Beijing, China:中國社會科學出版社=China Social Sciences Press。
-
昌彼得、潘美月(1986)。中國目錄學。臺北市=Taipei:文史哲=The Liberal Arts Press。
-
姜寶昌(2009)。墨經訓釋。濟南市=Jinan, China:齊魯書社=Qilu Press。
-
姚名達(1965)。中國目錄學史。臺北市=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press。
-
胡適(2008)。中國哲學史大綱:古代哲學史。臺北市=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press。
-
孫中原(2014)。墨學七講。北京市=Beijing, China:中國人民大學出版社=China Renmin University Press。
-
孫中原(2016)。中國邏輯學趣談。北京市=Beijing, China:商務印書館=The Commercial Press。
-
孫長祥(2003)。墨辯中的認識與語言。華岡文科學報,26,1-43。
-
孫詒讓(2001)。墨子閒詁。北京市=Beijing, China:中華書局=Zhonghua Book。
-
徐希燕(1999)。墨子的認識論研究。青海社會科學,1999(2),64-69。
-
秦彥士(1994)。墨子新論:壹個獨特的文化派別。成都市=Chengdu, China:成都電子科大出版社=University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Press。
-
馬玉珂編(1985)。西方邏輯史。北京市=Beijing, China:中國人民大學出版社=China Renmin University Press。
-
高亨(1958)。墨經校詮。臺北市=Taipei:世界書局=The World Book。
-
梁周敏(1995)。墨家邏輯論。開封市=Kaifeng, China:河南大學出版社=Henan University Press。
-
梁啟超(1957)。墨子學案。臺北市=Taipei:臺灣中華書局=Zhonghua Book。
-
陳孟麟(1996)。墨辯邏輯學新探。臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan。
-
陳癸淼(1977)。墨辯研究。臺北市=Taipei:臺灣學生書局=Student Book。
-
陳高傭(2016)。墨辯今解。北京市=Beijing, China:商務印書館=The Commercial Press。
-
陳道德、曾祥雲(2017)。符號學視野下的先秦名辯學研究。北京市=Beijing, China:人民出版社=People's Publishing House。
-
傅佩榮(2011)。一本就通:西方哲學史。臺北市=Taipei:聯經=Linking Publishing。
-
傅偉勳(2013)。西洋哲學史。臺北市=Taipei:三民書局=San Min Book。
-
勞思光(1981)。中國哲學史。臺北市=Taipei:三民書局=San Min Book。
-
馮友蘭(2011)。中國哲學史。北京市=Beijing, China:商務印書館=The Commercial Press。
-
楊百順(1984)。西方邏輯史。成都市=Chengdu, China:四川人民出版社=Sichuan People's Publishing House。
-
楊武金(2004)。墨經邏輯研究。北京市=Beijing, China:中國社會科學出版社=China Social Sciences Press。
-
詹劍峰(1956)。墨家的形式邏輯。武漢市=Wuhan, China:湖北人民出版社=Hubei People's Publishing House。
-
詹劍峰(2007)。墨子及墨家研究。武漢市=Wuhan, China:華中師範大學出版社=Central China Normal University Press。
-
蔡仁厚(1978)。墨家哲學。臺北市=Taipei:東大圖書=Tung Da Books。
-
錢穆(1986)。先秦諸子繫年。臺北市=Taipei:東大圖書=Tung Da Books。
-
譚戒甫(1981)。墨經分類譯注。北京市=Beijing, China:中華書局=Zhonghua Book。
|