题名

A Study on Scholars' Perceptions and Practices of Research Data Management

并列篇名

學者研究資料管理認知與實踐之研究

DOI

10.6182/jlis.202012_18(2).103

作者

陸怡靖(Yi-Ching Lu);柯皓仁(Hao-Ren Ke)

关键词

Research Data Management (RDM) ; Data Management Plan (DMP) ; Metadata ; Digital Scholarship ; 研究資料管理 ; 資料管理計畫 ; 詮釋資料 ; 數位化學術研究

期刊名称

圖書資訊學刊

卷期/出版年月

18卷2期(2020 / 12 / 01)

页次

103 - 137

内容语文

英文;繁體中文

中文摘要

The trends of digital scholarship, the fourth-paradigm, and data sharing attract attention to issues on research data management (RDM). RDM involves a series of activities throughout the whole research life cycle, including the production, description, storing, backing-up, processing, analyzing, preserving, sharing and reusing of research data. RDM assures scientific research affordable, accessible, fair, re-producible, verifiable, and sustainable. This study explores Taiwanese scholars' perceptions and practices of RDM via a questionnaire survey. It investigated issues including sources and types of research data, data storage and search, metadata of research data, data management plan (DMP) mandates or requirements, training and support, and data sharing and reuse. Furthermore, it attempts to understand if scholars' perceptions and practices reveal significant differences regarding subject disciplines, years of research experiences, and profession titles.

英文摘要

數位化學術研究、第四典範、資料分享等趨勢讓研究資料管理相關議題廣受重視。研究資料管理為貫穿整個研究生命週期的活動,包含資料的產生、描述、儲存、備份、處理、分析、保存、分享、再利用等,有助於避免資料損毀或遺失,便利學者間發現、分享與再用研究資料,並確保科學研究與結果是可負擔的、可被取用的、公正的、可再現的、可被檢驗的、可持續發展的。本研究以研究資料管理的主要利害相關者—學者—為研究對象,以問卷調查法探索學者對研究資料管理相關議題的認知與實踐,包含學者在研究資料使用與產出、儲存與管理,以及分享與再用等方面的認知與行為,並進一步了解各項認知與行為是否因學科、研究年資、職稱等因素而有所差異。

主题分类 人文學 > 圖書資訊學
参考文献
  1. 林奇秀, Chi-Shiou,賴璟毅, ChingYi(2018)。臺灣社會科學量化資料再用之研究:2001-2015。教育資料與圖書館學,55(1),39-69。
    連結:
  2. Akers, K. G.,Doty, J.(2013).Differences among faculty ranks in views on research data management.IASSIST Quarterly,36(2),16-20.
  3. Association of College and Research Libraries, Research Planning and Review Committee(2016).2016 top trends in academic libraries: A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education.College & Research Libraries News,77(6),274-281.
  4. Beagrie, N.,Houghton, J.(2014).,未出版
  5. Borgman, C. L.(2015).Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world.Cambridge, MA:MIT press.
  6. Borgman, C. L.(2012).The conundrum of sharing research data.Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology,63(6),1059-1078.
  7. Briney, K.(2015).Data management for researchers: Organize, maintain and share your data for research success.Exeter, England:Pelagic Publishing.
  8. Buys, C. M.,Shaw, P. L.(2015).Data management practices across an institution: Survey and report.Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication,3(2),eP1225.
  9. Chen, X.,Wu, M.(2017).Survey on the needs for chemistry research data management and sharing.The Journal of Academic Librarianship,43(4),346-353.
  10. Chowdhury, G.,Boustany, J.,Kurbanoğlu, S.,Ünal, Y.,Walton, G.(2017).Preparedness for research data sharing: A study of university researchers in three European countries.Digital libraries: Data, information, and knowledge for digital live,Cham, Switzerland:
  11. Cox, A. M.,Kennan, M. A.,Lyon, L.,Pinfield, S.(2017).Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturity.Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology,68(9),2182-2200.
  12. Data Curation Centre. (n.d.). Data management plans. Retrieved from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/data-management-plans
  13. DataONE. (n.d.). Data life cycle. Retrieved from https://www.dataone.org/data-life-cycle
  14. Eindhoven University of Technology Library. (n.d.). What is research data management? Retrieved from https://www.tue.nl/en/our-university/library/education-research-support/scientific-publishing/data-coach/general-terms-and-background/what-is-research-data-management/
  15. Hey, T.(Ed.),Tansley, S.(Ed.),Tolle, K.(Ed.)(2009).The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery.
  16. Joint Information Systems Committee. (2011). Developing digital literacies: Briefing paper in support of JISC grant funding 4/11. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/funding/2011/04/Briefingpaper.pdf
  17. Krosnick, J. A.(1999).Survey research.Annual Review of Psychology,50(1),537-567.
  18. Massey University Library. (2020). Introduction to research data management (RDM). Retrieved from http://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/research/library/library-services/research-services/manage-data/manage-data_home.cfm
  19. National Science Board. (2005). Long-lived digital data collections: Enabling research and education in the 21st century. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsb0540/
  20. National Science Foundation. (2017). Proposal & award policies & procedures guide: Chapter II - Proposal preparation instructions. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappg17_1/pappg_2.jsp
  21. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/61/38500813.pdf
  22. Perrier, L.,Barnes, L.(2018).Developing research data management services and support for researchers: A mixed methods study.Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research,13(1)
  23. Piwowar, H. A.(2011).Who shares? Who doesn’t? Factors associated with openly archiving raw research data.PloS ONE,6(7),e18657.
  24. Schöpfel, J.,Prost, H.(2016).Research data management in social sciences and humanities: A survey at the University of Lille (France).Libreas: Library Ideas,29,98-112.
  25. Steeleworthy, M.(2014).Research data management and the Canadian academic library: An organizational consideration of data management and data stewardship.Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research,9(1)
  26. Steinhart, G.,Chen, E.,Arguillas, F.,Dietrich, D.,Kramer, S.(2012).Prepared to plan? A snapshot of researcher readiness to address data management planning requirements.Journal of eScience Librarianship,1(2),63-78.
  27. Surkis, A.,Read, K.(2015).Research data management.Journal of the Medical Library Association,103(3),154-156.
  28. Tenopir, C.,Allard, S.,Douglass, K.,Aydinoglu, A. U.,Wu, L.,Read, E.,Frame, M(2011).Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions.PloS ONE,6(6),e21101.
  29. Tenopir, C.,Dalton, E. D.,Allard, S.,Frame, M.,Pjesivac, I.,Birch, B.,Dorsett, K.(2015).Changes in data sharing and data reuse practices and perceptions among scientists worldwide.PloS ONE,10(8),e0134826.
  30. UK Data Service. (n.d.). Data management planning for ESRC researchers. Retrieved from https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/manage-data/plan/dmp-esrc
  31. UK Data Service. (2014). Benefits of managing and sharing your data. Retrieved from https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/440285/whysharedata.pdf
  32. Ünal, Y.,Chowdhury, G.,Kurbanoğlu, S.,Boustany, J.,Walton, G.(2019).Research data management and data sharing behaviour of university researchers.Information Research: An International Electronic Journal,24(1)
  33. University of Oxford. (2018). University of Oxford policy on the management of data supporting research outputs. Retrieved from https://researchdata.ox.ac.uk/university-of-oxford-policy-on-the-management-of-data-supporting-research-outputs/
  34. Van den Eynden, V.,Corti, L.,Woollard, M.,Bishop, L.,Horton, L.(2011).Managing and sharing data: Best practice for researchers.
  35. Weller, M.(2011).The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice.London, England:Bloomsbury Academic.
  36. Whitmire, A. L.,Boock, M.,Sutton, S. C.(2015).Variability in academic research data management practices: Implications for data services development from a faculty survey.Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems,49(4),382-407.
  37. 李丹丹, Dandan,吳振新, Zhenxin(2012)。研究數據管理服務綜析。圖書館學研究,2012(9),54-59+69。
  38. 林奇秀, Chi-Shiou,賴璟毅, Ching-Yi(2017)。臺灣社會科學學者資料再用行為之研究。圖書資訊學研究,11(2),95-138。
  39. 科技部=Ministry of Science。科技部(無年代)。專題研究計畫執行同意書。檢自https://www.most.gov.tw/most/attachments/90b6179d-fcc0-4a12-b6be-2ef7c7ef6795【Ministry of Science and Technology. (n.d.) [Zhuan ti yan jiu ji hua zhi xing tong yi shu]. Retrieved from https://www.most.gov.tw/most/attachments/90b6179d-fcc0-4a12-b6be2ef7c7ef6795 (in Chinese)】。https://www.most.gov.tw/most/attachments/90b6179d-fcc0-4a12-b6be2ef7c7ef6795
  40. 科技部(2019)。科技部補助專題研究計畫作業要點。檢自https://law.most.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL026713【Ministry of Science and Technology. (2019). [Ke Ji Bu bu zhu zhuan ti yan jiu ji hua zuo ye yao dian]. Retrieved from https://law.most.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL026713 (in Chinese)】
  41. 秦韻涵, Yun-Han(2012)。臺北市=Taipei,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所=Department and Graduate Institute of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University。
  42. 陳雪華(編), Hsueh-Hua(Ed.),陳光華(編), Kuang-Hua (Ed.)(2012).e-Research:學術圖書館創新服務.臺北市=Taipei:國立臺灣大學圖書館=National Taiwan University Library.
  43. 陸怡靖, Yi-Ching(2019)。臺北市=Taipei,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所=Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies, National Taiwan Normal University。
被引用次数
  1. 石易儒(Yi-Ru Shih);鄭瑋(Wei Jeng)(2023)。臺灣犯罪學開放研究資料及典藏庫實踐:信任、契約與價值的流動。圖書資訊學刊。21(1)。137-168。