Cultural Differences in the Allocation of Attention to Information Architecture Components

使用者於資訊架構要素注意力分配之文化差異

10.6182/jlis.202106_19(1).019

鄭瑋(Wei Jeng)；胡馨元(Hsin-Yuan Hu)；湯高銘(Gao-Ming Tang)；簡士鎰(Shih-Yi Chien)

Information Architecture ； Web Design ； Cultural Dimensions ； 資訊架構 ； 網頁設計 ； Hofstede文化維度理論

圖書資訊學刊

19卷1期（2021 / 06 / 01）

19 - 41

英文

Well-designed web information architecture (IA) supports the findability and usability of web content, with the wider aim of ensuring efficient, positive user experiences. Accordingly, this study investigates cultural differences in how web visitors allocate their attention to the four main IA components: labeling, organization, navigation, and searching. We conducted a user study with 33 student participants from Taiwan and the United States, comprising observation tasks, note-taking sessions, and questionnaires regarding participants' attention allocation, as well as background questionnaires covering demographic, cultural, and personal factors. Our results indicated that, in general, the less complicated content a website displayed, the more aware the participants were of IA and its components. We also found that the US participants usually paid more attention to text labels on a webpage, whereas their Taiwanese counterparts were more likely to evenly distribute their attention across both text and image objects. These results shed new light on the cultural specificity of how existing IA is interpreted in global web communities and thus have important implications for future IA design.

良好的網站資訊架構能夠強化網站內容的可尋性與易用性，亦能確保良好的使用者體驗。本研究欲探索使用者將其注意力分配予四項資訊架構要素（命名、組織、導覽與搜尋系統）時所存在的文化差異。本研究招募33位來自臺灣及美國的大專學生進行使用者研究，上述測試涵蓋注意力分配、族群、文化、個人等因素。研究結果顯示，當網站內容的複雜性越低，則整體受測者對網站資訊架構要素的覺察程度越高。來自美國的受測者通常更注意網頁的文字標示，而臺灣受測者則較傾向將注意力平均分配予文字及圖像物件。本研究揭示全球異質化的網路社群在理解、消化資訊架構要素的歧異度，對於未來的資訊架構之設計具有重要啟示。

1. Boduroglu, A., Shah, P., & Nisbett, R. E. (2009). Cultural differences in allocation of attention in visual information processing. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 40(3), 349-360. doi: 10.1177/0022022108331005
   連結：
2. Chien, S.-Y., Lewis, M., Sycara, K., Liu, J.-S., & Kumru, A. (2016). Relation between trust attitudes toward automation, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and Big Five personality traits. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 841-845. doi: 10.1177/1541931213601192
   連結：
3. Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 102(35), 12629-12633. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506162102
   連結：
4. Cyr, D., & Trevor-Smith, H. (2004). Localization of web design: An empirical comparison of German, Japanese, and United States website characteristics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(13), 1-10. doi: 10.1002/asi.20075
   連結：
5. El mimouni, H., & MacDonald, C. M. (2015). Culture and information architecture: A study of American and Arab academic websites. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010091
   連結：
6. Fu, C. S., & Wu, W. Y. (2010). The means‐end cognitions of web advertising: a cross‐cultural comparison. Online Information Review, 34(5), 686-703. doi: 10.1108/14684521011084573
   連結：
7. Goyal, N., Miner, W., & Nawathe, N. (2012). Cultural differences across governmental website design. In R. Vatrapu, V. Evers, & K. B. Akhilesh (Chairs), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intercultural Collaboration (pp. 149-152). New York, NY: Association for Computing MachineryACM Press. doi: 10.1145/2160881.2160907
   連結：
8. Marcus, A., & Gould. E. W. (2000). Crosscurrents: Cultural dimensions and global web user-interface design. Interactions, 7(4), 32-46. doi: 10.1145/345190.345238
   連結：
9. Munzner, T. (2014). Visualization analysis and design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   連結：
10. Stull, E. (2018). Qualitative Research. In E. Stull (Ed.), UX Fundamentals for Non-UX Professionals (pp. 247-258). Berkeley, CA: Apress. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4842-3811-0
    連結：
11. Gronier, G. (2016). Measuring the first impression: Testing the validity of the 5 second test. Journal of Usability Studies, 12(1), 8-25.
12. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Doubleday.
13. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
14. Internet World Stats. (2020). Internet world users by language. Retrieved from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats7.htmhttps://www.internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm
15. Jeng, W., Hu, H.-Y., Tang, G. M., & Chien, S.-Y. (2021). Cultural differences in the allocation of attention to information architecture components [Data set]. Retrieved from osf.io/rkjh4
16. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17. Rosenfeld, L., Morville, P., & Arango, J. (2015). Information architecture: For the Web and beyond (4th ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
18. Singh, N., & Pereira, A. (2005). The culturally customized web site: Customizing web sites for the global marketplace. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
19. The World University Rankings. (2018). World university rankings 2018. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats
20. UsabilityHub. (2019). Five second tests. Retrieved from https://fivesecondtest.com/
21. Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE measuring. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(2), 193-21. doi: 10.1080/08961530.2011.578059