中文摘要
|
Bibliometrics and content analysis approaches were adopted in this study to review the papers issued in Journal of Library and Information Sciences from 1999 to 2020 to draw the landscape of library and information science studies, including research population, research subjects, research approaches and theories used. The results showed the growth of the research population, but the high percentage of one-time authors who lacked sustainable research efforts. Classical LIS topics, such as information behavior and information organization with mixed and newly developed approaches were the center of research. Research evaluation by bibliometrics approach expanded the scope of LIS studies. The presentation of theory linkage appeared limited, but increased in later published papers.
|
参考文献
|
-
Chang, Y.-W.(2012).Tracking scientometric research in Taiwan using bibliometric and content analysis.Journal of Library & Information Studies,10(2),1-20.
連結:
-
Ke, H.-R.,Sie, S.-H.(2019)。Exploring the research trends of library and information science, 2006-2015。Journal of Library & Information Science,45(1),65-96。
連結:
-
Journal of Library and Information Studies. (n.d.). Introduction. Retrieved from https://jlis.lis.ntu.edu.tw/html/about.html
-
(2010).Foundations of library and information science.New York, NY:Neal-Schuman.
-
Chang, Y.-W.(2019).Are articles in library and information science (LIS) journals primarily contributed to by LIS authors?.Scientometrics,121(1),81-104.
-
Chang, Y.-W.,Huang, M.-H.(2012).A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods.Journal of American Society & Information Science,63(1),22-33.
-
Chang, Y.-W.,Huang, M.-H.,Lin, C.-W.(2015).Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses.Scientometrics,105,2071-2087.
-
Chen, K.-H.,Lo, S.-C.,Lin, C.-J.(2002).The investigation of the consistency of subject cataloging for academic journal articles of library and information.Proceedings of the Conference on Information Communications,Taipei, Taiwan:
-
Connaway, L. S.,Powell, R. R.(2010).Basic research methods for librarians.Devon, England:Libraries Unlimited.
-
Julien, H.,Pecoskie, J. J.,Reed, K.(2011).Trends in information behavior research, 1999–2008: A content analysis.Library & Information Science Research,33(1),19-24.
-
Kim, S. J.,Jeong, D. Y.(2006).An analysis of the development and use of theory in library and information science research articles.Library & Information Science Research,28(4),548-562.
-
Larivière, V.,Sugimoto, C. R.,Cronin, B.(2012).A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred years.Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology,63(5),997-1016.
-
Lin, W.-Y. C.(2012).Research status and characteristics of library and information science in Taiwan: A bibliometric analysis.Scientometrics,92(1),7-21.
-
Ma, J.,Lund, B. D.(2020).The evolution of LIS research topics and methods from 2006 to 2018: A content analysis.Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology,57(1),e241.
-
Ullah, A.,Ameen, K.(2018).Account of methodologies and methods applied in LIS research: A systematic review.Library & Information Science Research,40(1),53-60.
-
Wu, M. M.,Liang, H. S.,Hsieh, H. H.,Lee, V.(2017).Theory use in library and information science journals in Taiwan 2010–2015.iConference 2017 Poster Descriptions
|