鏈結資料公用目錄的評估初探

An Evaluation Approach for Linked Data Public Access Catalogs

10.6182/jlis.202112_19(2).113

陳亞寧(Ya-Ning Chen)

鏈結資料 ； 線上公用目錄 ； 書目本體論 ； 資源探索系統 ； Linked Data ； Online Public Access Catalog ； Bibliographic Ontology ； Resource Discovery System

圖書資訊學刊

19卷2期（2021 / 12 / 01）

113 - 143

繁體中文

因應鏈結資料的應用發展，近年已有許多圖書館導入鏈結資料，提供更多的線上公用目錄資訊服務。本文旨在探討鏈結資料公用目錄的發展現況，以文獻探討分析歸納的11項功能服務為依據，選取具有豐富書目本體論語意關係的Jane Austen與其相關作品及相關衍生作品與個人為測試樣本，針對西班牙國家圖書館、法國國家圖書館，及美國國會書館鏈結資料系統與LD4P計畫之一的共享型虛擬探索環境（SHARE-VDE）等4個案例對象實際評估。研究結果發現4個案例已大致具備鏈結化資源探索等11項功能外，特色不盡相同，包括脈絡化公用目錄、鏈結資料公用目錄類型、鏈結資料化方式、URI鏈結化程度、語意關係與開放程度等。此外，本文亦就鏈結資料公用目錄與資源探索系統加以比較。

With the application and development of linked data (LD), libraries have begun to offer LD-based information services for users. This study uses a checklist-based evaluation derived from a literature review as a research tool to address the state-of-the-art development and issues related to LD public access catalogs (PACs). Jane Austen and her works as well as derived works and persons were selected as testing instances for LD PAC at four libraries as follows: Biblioteca Nacional de España, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Linked Data Service of Library of Congress and SHARE Virtual Discovery Environment. Eleven functions were included in the evaluation checklist. The degree of provision of each function by each LD public access catalog was found to be varied in terms of link-based resource discovery, linkage to external LD resources and types, self-descriptive and dynamic content, representation and query of LD relationship, aggregated knowledge contexts, information graph, serendipity, toURIsm navigation, facet based navigation, reconfiguration and repackage, keyword recommendation and openness of data. A comparison between resource discovery system and LD PACs is also presented.

1. 陳亞寧, Ya-Ning,溫達茂, Darmaw(2020)。MARC21鏈結資料化的轉變與應用。教育資料與圖書館學，57(1)，35-72。
   連結：
2. Biblioteca Nacional de España. (n.d.). Data model. Retrieved from http://www.bne.es/en/Inicio/Perfiles/Bibliotecarios/DatosEnlazados/Modelos/
3. LD4P Grant Proposal. (n.d.). Background and rationale. Retrieved from https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/LD4P/Background+and+Rationale
4. Alemu, G.,Stevens, B.,Ross, P.,Chandler, J.(2012).Linked data for libraries: Benefits of a conceptual shift from libraryspecific record structures to RDF-based data models.IFLA 2012 Conference Proceedings
5. Alemu, G.,Stevens, B.,Ross, P.,Chandler, J.(2014).Toward an emerging principle of linking socially-constructed metadata.Journal of Library Metadata,14(2),103-129.
6. Ali, I.,Warraich, N. F.(2018).Linked data initiatives in libraries and information centres: A systematic review.The Electronic Library,36(5),925-937.
7. Baker, T.,Bermès, E.,Coyle, K.,Dunsire, G.,Isaac, A.,Murray, P.,Zeng, M.(2011).,未出版
8. Bowen, J.(2010).Moving library metadata toward linked data: Opportunities provided by the extensible catalog.Proceedings of International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications 2010,Pittsburgh, PA:
9. Breeding, M.(2007).Next-generation library catalogs: Introduction.Library Technology Reports,43(4),5-14.
10. Breeding, M.(2018).Index-based discovery services: Current market positions and trends: Introduction.Library Technology Reports,54(8),5-9.
11. Candela, G.,Escobar, P.,Marco-Such, M.,Carrasco, R. C.(2015).Transformation of a library catalogue into RDA linked open data.Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2015,Cham, Germany:
12. Cole, T. W.,Han, M.-J.,Weathers, W. F.,Joyner, E.(2013).Library marc records into linked open data: Challenges and opportunities.Journal of Library Metadata,13(2/3),163-196.
13. Council on Library and Information Resources. (2011). Linked data for libraries,museums, and archives: Report of the Stanford Linked Data Workshop. 27 June–1 July 2011. Retrieved from https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub152/stanfordlinked-data-workshop/
14. Di Noia, T.,Ragone, A.,Maurino, A.,Mongiello, M.,Marzoccca, M. P.,Cultrera, G.,Bruno, M. P.(2016).Linking data in digital libraries: The case of Puglia Digital Library.Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Humanities in the Semantic Web (WHiSe 2016),Anissaras, Greece:
15. Ehrlinger, L.,Wöß, W.(2016).Towards a definition of knowledge graphs.SEMPDS-2016 Posters & Demos @ SEMANTiCS 2016 and SuCCESS’16 Workshop,Leipzig, Germany:
16. Feigenbaum, L. (2012). BBC’s adoption of semantic web technologies: An interview.Retrieved from https://www.cmswire.com/cms/information-management/bbcsadoption-of-semantic-web-technologiesan-interview-017981.php
17. Gonzales, B. M.(2014).Linking libraries to the web: Linked data and the future of the bibliographic record.Information Technology & Libraries,33(4),10-22.
18. Hallo, M.,Luján-Mora, S.,Maté, A.,Trujillo, J.(2016).Current state of linked data in digital libraries.Journal of Information Science,42(2),117-127.
19. Kaplan, L.(2012).The future of serials in a linked data world.Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference,Charleston, SC:
20. Marjit, U,Sharma, K.,Sarkar, A.,Krishnamurthy, M.(2013).Publishing legacy data as linked data: A state of the art survey.Library Hi Tech,31(3),520-535.
21. Moi, A.(2020).When linked data is (not) enough: Cataloguing tools between obsolescence and innovation.JLIS.it,11(2),1-19.
22. Neatrour, A.,Myntti, J.(2019).Western name authority file: A pilot regional name authority project.Journal of Library Metadata,19(1/2),19-38.
23. Possemato, T.(2018).How RDA is essential in the reconciliation and conversion processes for quality linked data.JLIS.it,9(1),48-60.
24. Simon, A.,Wenz, R.,Michel, V.,Di Mascio, A.(2013).Publishing bibliographic records on the web of data: Opportunities for the BnF (French National Library).The Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data. ESWC 2013,Berlin, Germany:
25. Southwick, S.B.(2015).Aguide for Transforming digital collectionsmetadata into linked data using open source technologies.Journal of Library Metadata,15(1),1-35.
26. Styles, R.,Ayers, D.,Shabir, N.(2008).Semantic MARC, MARC21 and the semantic web.Proceedings of the WWW2008 Workshop on Linked Data on the Web,Beijing, China:
27. Sullivan, D. (2020). A reintroduction to our knowledge graph and knowledge panels. Retrieved from https://blog.google/products/search/about-knowledge-graphand-knowledge-panels/
28. Tillett, B. B.(2004).Change cataloging, but don’t throw the baby out with the bath water!.For Festschrift International Librarianship – Today and Tomorrow (for the 65th birthday of Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Elmar Mittler)
29. Ullah, I.,Khusro, S.,Ullah, A.,Naeem, M.(2018).An overview of the current state of linked and open data in cataloging.Information Technology & Libraries,37(4),47-80.
30. Wahid, N.,Warraich, N. F.,Tahira, M.(2018).Mapping the cataloguing practices in information environment: A review of linked data challenges.Information & Learning Science,119(9/10),586-596.
31. Zeng, M. L.,Gracy, K. F.,Skirvin, L.(2013).Navigating the intersection of library bibliographic data and linked music information sources: A study of the identification of useful metadata elements for interlinking.Journal of Library Metadata,13(2/3),254-278.
32. 方凱鴻, Kai-Hong(2016)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所=Graduate Institute of Library & Information Studies, National Taiwan Normal University。

1. (2023)。鏈結資料發展下NBINet聯合目錄面臨挑戰及因應措施探討。國家圖書館館刊，112(1、2)，51-79。