题名

政府機關推行開放資料之影響因素探討：量化研究與多群組比較分析

并列篇名

Exploring the Factors Influencing Government Agencies' Intention to Implement Open Data Policies in Taiwan: A Quantitative and Multigroup Analysis Perspective

DOI

10.6182/jlis.202206_20(1).131

作者

楊東謀(Tung-Mou Yang)；吳孟家(Meng-Chia Wu)

关键词

開放政府 ； 開放政府資料 ； 開放資料 ； 政府透明 ； 臺灣 ； Open Governemnt ； Open Government Data ； Open Data ； Government Transparency ； Taiwan

期刊名称

圖書資訊學刊

卷期/出版年月

20卷1期（2022 / 06 / 01）

页次

131 - 171

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

政府開放資料於近年已成為國際間各國政府的施政重點之一，期以達到政府透明、公眾參與以及協同合作的開放政府目標。然政府機關的開放資料參與會受到許多因素影響，因此，本研究透過文獻檢閱過往開放資料相關研究，提出影響因素之研究假設以建立量化模型進行分析，探討影響我國政府機關推行開放資料政策之意願與行為的因素。所探討之因素為認知有用性、預期成本、外部影響、外部促成條件、組織能力、法令政策、領導階層、開放資料價值認知與預期風險。本研究亦以機關參與開放資料之時間歷程進行多群組分析，探討影響因素在不同實行時間歷程之機關間是否有差異性影響存在，並於文內進行討論與提供實務建議，以供政府持續推行開放資料政策時之參考。
英文摘要

Open government data (OGD) has become an important policy implementation around the global government administrations while OGD is expected to help achieve the principles of open government, including transparency, participation and collaboration. However, as indicated in the literature, there have been factors existing to influence government agencies' open data participation. In this research, recent open data literature is first reviewed, and related hypotheses are developed for forming a conceptual model for conducting quantitative analysis and exploring how the factors influence government agencies' intention and behavior of open data policy implementation. The investigated factors are perceived usefulness, perceived cost, external influence, facilitating condition, organizational capability, legislation and policy, agency leadership, perceived value of OGD, and perceived risk. Particularly, multigroup analysis (MGA) is adopted in this study for exploring whether the investigated factors have different weights on government agencies having different years of experience of open data policy implementation. Based on the quantitative data analysis results, the discussions and practical implications of this research can provide insights to practitioners and policy makers and also enrich the current open data related literature.
主题分类 人文學 > 圖書資訊學
参考文献
  1. 賴泱州, Y.-C.,楊東謀, T.-M.(2017)。地方政府機關之開放資料影響因素探討：以臺中市政府為例。教育資料與圖書館學，54(2)，185-219。
    連結：
  2. 羅晉, J.(2015)。政府開放資料之系統性與制度性觀點的分析。臺灣民主季刊，12(4)，1-37。
    連結：
  3. 羅晉, J.,楊東謀, T.-M.,王慧茹, H.-J.,項靖, J.(2014)。政府開放資料的策略與挑戰：使用者觀點的分析。電子商務研究，12(3)，283-300。
    連結：
  4. Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018, H.R. 4174, 115d Cong. (2017-2018). (2019, January 14). https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4174/text
  5. Ajzen, I.(1991).The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,50(2),179-211.
  6. Albano, C. S.,Reinhard, N.(2014).Open government data: Facilitating and motivating factors for coping with potential barriers in the Brazilian context.Lecture notes in computer science: Vol 8653. Electronic Government
  7. Aldrich, H. E.,R u e f, M.(2006).Organizations evolving.Sage Publications.
  8. Attard, J.,Orlandi, F.,Scerri, S.,Auer, S.(2015).A system review of open government data initiatives.Government Information Quarterly,32(4),399-418.
  9. Barry, E.,Bannister, F.(2014).Barriers to open data release: A view from the top.Information Polity,19(1/2),129-152.
  10. Bertot, J. C.,Jaeger, P. T.,Grimes, J. M.(2010).Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti corruption tools for societies.Government Information Quarterly,27(3),264-271.
  11. Birchall, C.(2015).Data.gov-in-a-box’: Delimiting transparency.European Journal of Social Theory,18(2),185-202.
  12. Boulton, G.,Rawlins, M.,Vallance, P.,Walport, M.(2011).Science as a public enterprise: The case for open data.The Lancet,377(9778),1633-1635.
  13. Cenfetelli, R. T.,Bassellier, G.(2009).Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research.MIS Quarterly,33(4),689-707.
  14. Chun, S. A.,Shulman, S.,Sandoval, R.,Hovy, E.(2010).Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government.Information Polity,15(1/2),1-9.
  15. Conradie, P.,Choenni, S.(2014).On the barriers for local government releasing open data.Government Information Quarterly,31(Suppl. 1),S10-S17.
  16. Cranefield, J.,Robertson, O.,Oliver, G.(2014).Value in the mash: Exploring the benefits, barriers and enablers of open data apps.Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2014
  17. Department of Economic and Social Affairs(2020).United Nations e-government survey 2020: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development, with addendum on COVID-19 response.United Nations Publications.
  18. Diamantopoulos, A.,Siguaw, J. A.(2006).Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration.British Journal of Management,17(4),263-282.
  19. Eckartz, S. M.,Hofman, W. J.,van Veenstra, A. F.(2014).A decision model for data sharing.Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 8653. Electronic Government
  20. Evans, A. M.,Campos, A.(2013).Open government initiatives: Challenges of citizen participation.Journal of Policy Analysis & Management,32(1),172-185.
  21. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
  22. Garson, G. D.(2016).Partial least squares: Regression and structural equation models.Statistical Associates Publishers.
  23. Gertrudis-Casado, M.-C.,Gértrudix-Barrio, M.,Álvarez-García, S.(2016).Competencias informativas profesionales y datos abiertos. Retos para el empoderamiento ciudadano y el cambio social.Comunicar,24(47),39-47.
  24. Gil-Garcia, J. R.(2008).Using partial least squares in digital government research.Handbook of research on public information technology
  25. Gómez, E. A. R.(2017).Perceptions about the concept and benefits of open government in local governments in Spain.ICEGOV‘17: Proceed ings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
  26. Granickas, K.(2013).,European Public Sector Information Platform.
  27. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective.Pearson Education.
  28. Hair, J. F.,Hult, G. T. M.,Ringle, C. M.,Sarstedt, M.(2016).A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).Sage Publications.
  29. Hair, J. F.,Ringle, C. M.,Sarstedt, M.(2011).PLS-SEM: Indeed a Sliver Bullet.Journal of the Marketing Theory & Practice,19(2),139-152.
  30. Hair, J. F.,Risher, J. J.,Sarstedt, M.,Ringle, C. M.(2019).When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM.European Business Review,31(1),2-24.
  31. Hair, J. F.,Sarstedt, M.,Ringle, C. M.,Mena, J. A.(2012).An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,40,414-433.
  32. Henseler, J.,Dijkstra, T. K.,Sarstedt, M.,Ringle, C. M.,Diamantopoulos, A.,Straub, D. W.,Ketchen, D. J.,Jr.,Hair, J. F.,Hult, G. T. M.,Calantone, R. J.(2014).Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Commentson Rönkkö and Evermann (2013).Organizational Research Methods,17(2),182-209.
  33. Henseler, J.,Ringle, C. M.,Sarstedt, M.(2016).Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares.International Marketing Review,33(3),405-431.
  34. Henseler, J.,Ringle, C. M.,Sarstedt, M.(2015).A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,43,115-135.
  35. Henseler, J.,Ringle, C. M.,Sinkovics, R. R.(2009).The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing.New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 20)
  36. HM Government. (2013). Seizing the data opportunity: A strategy for UK data capability. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/254136/bis-13-1250-strategy-for-uk-data-capability-v4.pdf
  37. Hossain, M. A.,Dwivedi, Y. K.,Rana, N. P.(2016).State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda.Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce,26(1/2),14-40.
  38. Hu, L.-T.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1),1-55.
  39. Hu, L.-T.,Bentler, P. M.(1998).Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods,3(4),424-453.
  40. Huijboom, N.,van den Broek, T.(2011).Open data: An international comparison of strategies.European Journal of ePractice,12,1-13.
  41. Janssen, M.,Charalabidis, Y.,Zuiderwijk, A.(2012).Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government.Information System Management,29(4),258-268.
  42. Janssen, M.,Zuiderwijk, A.(2014).Infomediary business models for connecting open data providers and users.Social Science Computer Review,32(5),694-711.
  43. Jetzek, T.,Avital, M.,Bjorn-Andersen, N.(2014).Data-driveninnovation through open government data.Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research,9(2),100-120.
  44. Kaasenbrood, M.,Zuiderwijk, A.,Janssen, M.,de Jong, M.,Bharosa, N.(2015).Exploring the factors influencing the adoption of open government data by private organisations.International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age,2(2),75-92.
  45. Kalidien, S.,Choenni, S.,Meijer, R.(2010).Crime statistics online: Potentials and challenges.Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities
  46. Kučera, J.,Chlapek, D.(2014).Benefits and risks of open government data.Journal of Systems Integration,5(1),30-41.
  47. Kulk, S.,van Loenen, B.(2012).Brave new open data world?.International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research,7,196-206.
  48. Lee, D.,Cyganiak, R.,Decker, S.(2014).,Insight Centre for Data Analytics, NUI Galway.
  49. Machado, A. L.,de Oliveira, J. M. P.(2011).DIGO: An open data architecture for e-government.2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops
  50. Marcoulides,G. A.(Ed.)(1998).The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling Modern methods for business research.Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
  51. Martin, S.,Foulonneau, M.,Turki, S.,Ihadjadene, M.(2013).Risk analysis to overcome barriers to open data.Electronic Journal of e-Government,11(1),348-359.
  52. Open Knowledge Foundation. (n.d.). The open data handbook. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/
  53. Parycek, P.,Höchtl, J.,Ginner, M.(2014).Open government data implementation evaluation.Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research,9(2),80-99.
  54. Peled, A.(2011).When transparency and collaboration collide: The USA Open Data program.Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology,62(11),2085-2094.
  55. Raines, J.(2012).The digital accountability and transparency act of 2011 (DATA): Using open data principles to revamp spending transparency legislation.New York Law School Law Review,57,313-360.
  56. Reinartz, W.,Haenlein, M.,Henseler, J.(2009).An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM.International Journal of Research in Marketing,26(4),332-344.
  57. Rogers, E. M.(1995).Diffusion of innovations.Free Press.
  58. Rosnay, M. D.,Janssen, K.(2014).Legal and institutional challenges for opening data across public sectors: Towards common policy solutions.Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research,9(3),1-14.
  59. Safarov, I.,Meijer, A.,Grimmelikhuijsen, S.(2017).Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users.Information Polity,22(1),1-24.
  60. Solar, M.,Daniels, F.,López, R.,Meijueiro, L.(2014).A model to guide the open government data implementation in public agencies.Journal of Universal Computer Science,20(11),1564-1582.
  61. Susha, I.,Grönlund, Å.,Janssen, M.(2015).Driving factors of service innovation using open government data: An exploratory study of entrepreneurs in two countries.Information Polity,20(1),19-34.
  62. Susha, I.,Zuiderwijk, A.,Janssen, M.,Grönlund, Å.(2015).Benchmarks for evaluating the progress of open data adoption: Usage, limitations, and lessons learned.Social Science Computer Review,33(5),613-630.
  63. Ubaldi, B. (2013). Opengovernment data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. (OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No.22). https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en
  64. Venkatesh, V.,Morris, M. G.,Davis, G. B.,Davis, F. D.(2003).User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.MIS Quarterly,27(3),425-478.
  65. Vetrò, A.,Canova, L.,Torchiano, M.,Minotas, C. O.,Iemma, R.,Morando, F.(2016).Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data.Government Information Quarterly,33(2),325-337.
  66. Weerakkody, V.,Irani, Z.,Kapoor, K.,Sivarajah, U.,Dwivedi, Y. K.(2017).Open data and its usability: An empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective.Information Systems Frontiers,19,285-300.
  67. Welch, E. W.(2012).The relationship between transparent and participative government: Astudy of local governments in the United States.International Review of Administrative Sciences,78(1),93-115.
  68. Welle Donker, F.,van Loenen, B.,Bregt, A. K.(2016).Open data and beyond.ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information,5(4),48.
  69. Yang, T.-M.,Lo, J.,Shiang, J.(2015).To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data.Journal of Information Science,41(5),596-612.
  70. Yang, T.-M.,Wu, Y.-J.(2014).Exploring the determinants of cross-boundary inf or mation s har ing in the public sector: An e-Government case study in Taiwan.Journal of Information Science,40(5),649-668.
  71. Yang, T.-M.,Wu, Y.-J.(2016).Examining the socio-technical determinants influencing government agencies’ open data publication: A study in Taiwan.Government Information Quarterly,33(3),378-392.
  72. Yang, T.-M.,Wu, Y.-J.(2021).Looking for datasets to open: An exploration of government officials’ information behaviors in open data policy implementation.Government Information Quarterly,38(2)
  73. Yannoukakou, A.,Araka, I.(2014).Access to government information: Right to information and open government data synergy.Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences,147,332-340.
  74. Yu, H.,Robinson, D. G.(2012).The new ambiguity of “open government.UCLA Law Review Discourse,59,178-208.
  75. Zeleti, F. A.,Ojo, A.(2017).Open data value capability architecture.Information System Frontiers,19(2),337-360.
  76. Zeleti, F. A.,Ojo, A.,Curry, E.(2016).Exploring the economic value of open government data.Government Information Quarterly,33(3),535-551.
  77. Zuiderwijk, A.,Janssen, M.(2014).The negative effects of open government data—Investigating the dark side of open data.dg.o ‘14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
  78. Zuiderwijk, A.,Janssen, M.(2014).Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison.Government Information Quarterly,31(1),17-29.
  79. Zuiderwijk, A.,Janssen, M.,Choenni, S.(2012).Open data policies: Impediments and challenges.Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on eGovernment
  80. Zuiderwijk, A.,Janssen, M.,Dwivedi, Y. K.(2015).Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology.Government Information Quarterly,32(4),429-440.
  81. Zuiderwijk, A.,Susha, I.,Charalabidis, Y.,Parycek, P.,Janssen, M.(2015).Open data disclosure and use: Critical factors from a case study.CeDEM 2015: Proceedings of the International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 2015
  82. 李治安, J.-A.,林誠夏, C.-S.,莊庭瑞, T.-R(2014)。開放政府資料的基本原則與相關政策議題。公共治理季刊，2(1)，65-76。
  83. 國家發展委員會（2015，12月）。「第五階段電子化政府計畫」 （ 106年-109年）。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_27_25196【National Development Council. (2015, December). [“Di wu jieh duan dian zih hua jheng fu ji hua” (106 nian-109 nian)]. https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_27_25196 (in Chinese)】
  84. 國家發展委員會（無日期）。服務型智慧政府2.0推動計畫（110年-114年） 。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=C531757D5FE32950【National Development Council. (n.d.). [Fu wu sing jhih huei jheng fu 2.0 tuei dong ji hua (110 nian-114 nian)]. https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=C531757D5FE32950 (in Chinese)】
  85. 張家生, J.-S.(2012)。從臺北市看政府公開資料（Open Data）。研考雙月刊，36(4)，61-69。
  86. 陳怡君, Y.-J.(2013)。開放政府資料迎接資料民主新時代。公共治理季刊，1(1)，156-163。
  87. 陳舜伶、林珈宏、莊庭瑞（2013）。藏智於民：開放政府資料的原則與現況。中央研究院，資訊科技創新研究中心，臺灣創用CC計畫。http://creativecommons.tw/sites/creativecommons.tw/files/download/handbook_open_gov_data.pdf【[Chen, S.-L.], [Lin, J.-H.], & [Jhuang, T.-R.] (2013). Empowering citizens with data: An open government data handbook. Academia Sinica, Research Center for Information Technology Innovation, Creative Commons Taiwan. http://creativecommons.tw/sites/creativecommons.tw/files/download/h a n dbook_open_gov_data.pdf(inChinese)】
  88. 曾柏瑜, P.-Y.,李梅君, M.-C.(2017)。,開放文化基金會 Open Culture Foundation。
  89. 項靖, J.,楊東謀, T.-M.,羅晉, J.(2013)。,電子治理研究中心=Electronic Governance Research Center。
  90. 黃心怡, S.- Y.,蘇彩足, T.-Z.,蕭乃沂, N.-Y(2016)。再探開放政府資料的政策與發展。國土及公共治理季刊，4(4)，18-28。
  91. 蕭景燈, J.-D.(2012)。資料開放發展現況與展望。研考雙月刊，36(4)，22-38。
被引用次数
  1. (2024).Social Adaptation through Digital Literacy among LIS Students in Post-COVID-19 in Indonesia.圖書資訊學刊,22(1),59-89.
print cancel