無障礙閱讀資源整合查詢系統介面易用性評估

Assessment of the Accessibility of the Integrated Information System for People with Disabilities

10.6182/jlis.202212_20(2).129

林巧敏(Chiao-Min Lin)

身心障礙數位資源 ； 易用性測試 ； 使用者實測 ； 使用者導向設計 ； 系統介面分析 ； Digital Resources for People with Disabilities ； Usability Testing ； User Testing ； User-centered Design ； System Interface Analysis

圖書資訊學刊

20卷2期（2022 / 12 / 01）

129 - 160

繁體中文

本研究進行「無障礙閱讀資源整合查詢系統」設計易用性評估，採任務導向之實測觀察身心障礙者檢索歷程與操作問題，再輔以深度訪談及問卷方式，分析受測者對於系統學習性、助記性、容錯性、效率性，以及滿意度之意見及認同程度。研究結果發現：（1）使用個人化服務功能發生錯誤以及花費時間最多；（2）視覺障礙者「操作猶豫」及「提問」次數偏高，完成任務時間明顯高於其他類型障礙者；（3）導致錯誤原因多屬功能鍵位置設計不當；（4）檢索結果排序及圖書檢索功能的網頁迷失度較高；（5）系統操作說明位置不明顯且說明文字較為冗長。最終，根據研究結論，提出系統功能改善建議。

This study conducted task-based usability testing to evaluate ＂the Integrated Information System for People with Disabilities of National Taiwan Library.＂ Adopted observation analysis to record the user's retrieval process and problems, supplemented by in-depth interviews, to explore the user's opinions after testing. Questionnaires also were taken to measure the awareness for the learnability, memorability, error frequency and severity, efficiency and satisfaction of the system. The results are summarized as follows: (1) Personalized service functions generate the most operating errors and take the most time. (2) Visually-impaired persons have a high frequency of ＂operation hesitation＂ and ＂questioning,＂ and the time to complete tasks is higher than other types of impaired persons. (3) Most of the reasons for the error are improper design of the function key position. (4) The sorting of search results and the operation process of search have high lostness in web pages. (5) The position of the system operation instructions is not obvious and the textual description is lengthy. According to the result, the suggestions of usability design have been proposed for improving the system interface.

1. 吳方彣, Fang-Wen,賴紀廷, Chi-Ting,溫伊梵, I-Fan,林育伶, Yu-Ling, Sophie,張千惠, Chien-Huey,張智凱, Chih-Kai(2014)。視覺障礙者英文聽力輔助學習工具開發與系統易用性評估。人文社會學報，10(4)，353-372。
   連結：
2. 林巧敏, Chiao-Min(2014)。檔案檢索工具易用性評估實例分析。國家圖書館館刊，103(1)，35-62。
   連結：
3. 林巧敏, Chiao-Min(2018)。從網站管理者視角分析圖書館網頁無障礙檢測結果。圖資與檔案學刊，10(2)，107-135。
   連結：
4. 林巧敏, Chiao-Min(2019)。視障及聽障者取用圖書館網頁資訊之無障礙分析。圖書資訊學刊，17(1)，83-116。
   連結：
5. 林巧敏, Chiao-Min,范維媛, Wei-Yuan(2013)。數位典藏資訊網易用性評估：以人文社會科學相關領域中綱計畫成果資訊網為例。圖書館學與資訊科學，39(1)，46-63。
   連結：
6. Akgül, Y.(2021).Accessibility, usability, quality performance, and readability evaluation of university websites of Turkey: A comparative study of state and private universities.Universal Access in the Information Society,20(1),157-170.
7. AlSaeed, D.,Alkhalifa, H.,Alotaibi, H.,Alshalan, R.,Al-Mutlaq, N.,Alshalan, S.,Bintaleb, H. T.,AlSahow, A. M.(2020).Accessibility evaluation of Saudi E-Government systems for teachers: A visually impaired user’s perspective.Applied Sciences,10(21),Article 7528.
8. Bevan, N.,Carter, J.,Harker, S.(2015).ISO 9241-11 revised: What have we learnt about usability since 1998?.Human-computer interaction: Design and evaluation. HCI 2015
9. Byerley, S. L.,Chambers, M. B.(2002).Accessibility and usability of Web-based library databases for non-visual users.Library Hi Tech,20(2),169-178.
10. Dermody, K.,Majekodunmi, N.(2011).Online databases and the research experience for university students with print disabilities.Library Hi Tech,29(1),149-160.
11. Foley, A.(2011).Exploring the design, development and use of websites through accessibility and usability studies.Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia,20(4),361-385.
12. Gwizdka, J.,Spence, I.(2007).Implicit measures of lostness and success in web navigation.Interacting with Computers,19(3),357-369.
13. Hall, V.,Conboy-Hill, S.,Taylor, D.(2011).Using virtual reality to provide health care information to people with intellectual disabilities: Acceptability, usability, and potential utility.Journal of Medical Internet Research,13(4),Article e91.
14. Johansson, S.,Gulliksen, J.,Gustavsson, C.(2021).Disability digital divide: The use of the internet, smartphones, computers and tablets among people with disabilities in Sweden.Universal Access in the Information Society,20(1),105-120.
15. Kennedy, H.,Evans, S.,Thomas, S.(2011).Can the web be made accessible for people with intellectual disabilities?.The Information Society,27(1),29-39.
16. Kosztyánné Mátrai, R.(2018).How to make an electronic library accessible.The Electronic Library,36(4),620-632.
17. Lazar, J.,Briggs, I.(2015).Improving services for patrons with print disabilities at public libraries.The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy,85(2),172-184.
18. Nielsen, J.(1993).Usability engineering.Academic Press.
19. Nielsen, J. (2000, March 18). Why you only need to test with five users. Nielsen Norman Group. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html
20. Nimmolrat, A.,Khuwuthyakorn, P.,Wientong, P.,Thinnukool, O.(2021).Pharmaceutical mobile application for visually-impaired people in Thailand: Development and implementation.BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making,21(1),Article 217.
21. Pearrow, M.(2007).Web usability handbook.Charles River Media.
22. Power, J. A.(2018).EBSCO information services usability study on accessibility.Reference Services Review,46(3),449-459.
23. Preece, J.(1997).A guide to usability: Human factors in computing.Wiley Computer Publishing.
24. Rodrigo, C.,Tabuenca, B.(2020).Learning ecologies in online students with disabilities.Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal,28(1),53-64.
25. Smith, P. A.(1996).Towards a practical measure of hypertext usability.Interacting with Computers,8(4),365-381.
26. Stewart, R.,Narendra, V.,Schmetzke, A.(2005).Accessibility and usability of online library databases.Library Hi Tech,23(2),265-286.
27. Tullis, T.,Albert, B.(2013).Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metric.Elsevier.
28. Web Accessibility Initiative. (2012). The business case for digital accessibility. https://www.w3.org/WAI/business-case/
29. Williams, P.,Shekhar, S.(2019).People with learning disabilities and smartphones: Testing the usability of a touch-screen interface.Education Sciences,9(4),Article 263.
30. Yeong, J. L.,Thomas, P.,Buller, J.,Moosajee, M.(2021).A newly developed web-based resource on genetic eye disorders for users with visual impairment (Gene.Vision): Usability study.Journal of Medical Internet Research,23(1),Article e19151.
31. 李佳玲, Chia-Ling(2013)。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所=Department of Library & Information Science, National Taiwan University。
32. 國立臺灣圖書館（2021年1月4日）。視障服務。https://www.ntl.edu.tw/ct.asp?xItem=16340&CtNode=1779&mp=1【National Taiwan Library. (2021, January 4). [Shi zhang fu wu]. https://www.ntl.edu.tw/ct.asp?xItem=16340&CtNode=1779&mp=1 (in Chinese)】
33. 數位發展部（無日期）。關於無障礙。無障礙網站空間服務網。https://accessibility.moda.gov.tw/Accessible/Index【Ministry of Digital Affairs. (n.d.). [Guan yu wu zhang ai]. [Wu Zhang Ai Wang Zhan Kong Jian Fu Wu Wang]. https://accessibility.moda.gov.tw/Accessible/Index (in Chinese)】
34. 鄭嘉雯, Jia-Wen(2012)。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所=Department of Library & Information Science, National Taiwan University。
35. 魏澤群, Ze-Qun(2007).優使性2.0（Usability 2.0）：網站經驗設計與使用者研究.網奕資訊=Habook Group.