题名

學校革新發展與評鑑策略之啟示－以美國Florida州教育廳技術輔助文件為例

并列篇名

The Application of School Improvement in Development and Evaluation: The Example of Florida Department of Education in USA

DOI

10.6423/HHHC.200811.0045

作者

徐易男(Yi-Nan Hsu)；黃昭勳(Chao-Hsun Huang)

关键词

Florida州教育廳 ； 教育品質 ； 學校革新 ； 學校評鑑 ； education quality ； Florida Department of Education ； school evaluation ； school improvement

期刊名称

學校行政

卷期/出版年月

58期（2008 / 11 / 01）

页次

45 - 59

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

學校革新有助於學校辦學品質與績效責任達成，並對校長校務領導有所助益。因此本文擬從學校革新的意義與內涵、學校革新的發展談起，並介紹美國Florida州教育廳所出版的學校革新評鑑策略輔助文件，論述其評鑑之內涵，最後並提供七點教育啟示，包括(1)透過RDDA模式促成學校革新的達成；(2)強調績效責任；(3)學生學習成就的重視；(4)教師素質的提升；(5)重視各層級之教育目的與實施策略間層次觀與關聯性；(6)領導者施行跨域治理；(7)建立標竿學校等提供給教育工作者參考。
英文摘要

School improvement will promote school quality and accountability, and it also will enhance the ability of principal's leadership. Firstly, the essay introduces the meanings and connotation of school improvement. Besides, it notices the evaluation and strategies of school improvement in Florida State in USA. Finally the author suggests some strategies about school improvement. (1) achieve school improvement by RDDA model; (2) emphasize the accountability; (3) lay emphasis on the performance of students; (4) advance the teacher quality; (5) connect the education goals and the strategies; (6) administer cross-field governance; (7) frame the benchmarking school.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 廖俊松、曾憲華(2006)。全球化下地方警政跨域治理之初探。中國地方自治，59(2)，3-18。
    連結：
  2. Barth, R. S.(1991).Improving schools from within: teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  3. Darling-Hammond, L.(1997).The quality of teaching matters most.Journal of Staff Development,8(1),38-41.
  4. A technical assistance document for evaluating your school improvement process
  5. Fullan, M.(1992).Successful school improvement.Buckingham:OU Press.
  6. Gray, J.,Reynolds, D.,Fitz-Gibbon, C.,Jesson, D.(1996).Merging traditions: The future of research on school effectiveness and school improvement.London:Cassell.
  7. Guba, E.,Lincoln, Y.(1989).Fourth generation evaluation.California:Sage.
  8. Harris, A.(2001).Department improvement and school improvement: a missing link?.British Educational Research Journal,27(4),477-486.
  9. Harris, A.,Chapman, C.(2004).Improving schools in difficult contexts: towards a differentiated approach.British Journal of Educational Studies,52(4),417-431.
  10. Harris, A.,Hopkins, D.(2000).Introduction to Special Feature: alternative perspectives on school improvement.School Leadership & Management,20(1),9-14.
  11. Harris, A.,Young, J.(2000).Comparing school improvement programmes in England and Canada.School Leadership & Management,20(1),31-42.
  12. Hopkins, D.,Ainscow. M,West, M.(1994).School improvement in an era of change.London:Cassell.
  13. Hopkins, D.,Harris, A.(1997).Improving the quality of education for all.Support for Learning,12(4),147-151.
  14. Hopkins, D.,Reynolds, D.(2001).The past, present and future of school improvement: towards the third age.British Educational Research Journal,27(4),459-475.
  15. Johnson, J.(1997).Data-driven school improvement.Emergency Librarian,24(4),30-31.
  16. Miles, M. B.(1986).Innovation in education.New York:Columbia University.
  17. Newmann, F.,King, B.,Young, P.(2000).Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
  18. Russell, B.(1976).On education.London:Geoge Allen & Unwin.
  19. Stufflebeam, D. L.(eds.),G. F. Madaus,M.S. Scriven(1983).Evaluation models: viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation.Boston:Kluwer-Nijhoff.
  20. Teddlie, C.,Reynolds, D.(2000).The international handbook of school effectiveness research.London:Falmer Press.
  21. 王文科(2006)。課程與教學論。臺北市:五南。
  22. 李玉惠(2003)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
  23. 林水波、李長晏(2005)。跨域治理。臺北市:五南。
  24. 秦夢群(1997)。教育行政－理論部分。臺北市:五南。
  25. 秦夢群、吳政達(2006)。國民教育階段學校行政績效指標體系建構之研究。教育資料與研究，68，43-62。
  26. 張成秋(1995)。自律：教育革新的關鍵。「教育改革：理論與實踐」國際學術研討會論文集，臺北市:
  27. 張明輝(1999)。學校教育與行政革新研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
  28. 楊國賜(1995)。現代化與教育革新。臺北市:師大書苑。
  29. 楊德東(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
  30. 饒見維(1999)。九年一貫課程與教師專業發展之配套實施策略。「邁向課程新紀：九年一貫課程研討會」論文集（下），臺北市:
print cancel