從生活政治觀點分析教師專業認同

Analyzing Teacher Professional Identity from Life Politics Perspectives

10.6423/HHHC.201005.0031

楊智雄(Chih-Hsiung Yang)

九年一貫課程 ； 生活政治 ； 能動 ； 專業學習社群 ； 解放政治 ； agency ； emancipatory politics ； life politics ； nine-year integrated curriculum policy ； professional learning community

學校行政

67期（2010 / 05 / 01）

31 - 50

繁體中文

本研究借用生活政治觀點，以國小專業學習社群之教師共4 人進行個案研究，描述他們在專業發展過程的知覺、情感與行動。早期教師專業認同之研究係採取解放政治觀點，聚焦消滅階級、反剝削及反壓迫等議題，關注自主、平等、參與、啟蒙與自我彰權之概念，前述解放政治的發展過程，已然拓植教師對教學自主空間，將專業交還自己。幾年來九年一貫課程所帶動之教育改革已從激情轉向溫和，促使本土教師具備高度反思性，從關心自己生存環境出發，彙集出一股能動性，解決利益對立及價值衝突，重新確認教師在學校生活世界的位置，以催化參與政治的美感。

The purpose of the research is to carry out a case study from elementary school teachers in the professional learning community with interpretation of perceptions, emotions, and actions in the process of professional development from life politics approaches. Early teacher professional identity researches which were taken the perspectives of emancipatory politics focused on the eradication of social class, anti-exploitation, and counter-suppression. Paying attention to issues such as autonomy, equality, participation, enlightenment and self-empowerment, it had developed teacher's awareness and handed over profession to one's own. However, the educational reforms led by nine-year integrated curriculum policy facilitating local teachers highly reflexivity, caring for his own living environments, and formulating the agency in solution to the opposition between the interests and values had been removed from the furious push steering a mild situation in recent years. Moreover, it had reaffirmed the teachers' position in their school life world, and fostered esthetics in participation with politics.

1. 姜添輝(2002)。九年一貫課程政策影響教師專業自主權之研究。教育研究集刊，48(2)，157-197。
   連結：
2. 姜添輝(2003)。教師是專業或是觀念簡單性的忠誠執行者？文化再製理論的檢證。教育研究集刊，49(4)，93-126。
   連結：
3. 張盈堃、陳慧璇(2004)。矛盾：基層教師生活世界的宰制與抗拒。應用心理研究，21，35-62。
   連結：
4. 黃騰(2008)。A. Giddens自反現代性其及對師資培育課程研究之啟發。教育研究集刊，54(1)，87-116。
   連結：
5. 楊巧玲(2008)。教育改革對教師專業認同之影響：五位國中資深教師的探索性研究。師大學報，53(1)，25-54。
   連結：
6. Beijaard, D.,Meijer, P. C.,Verloop, N.(2004).Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity.Teaching and Teacher Education,20,107-128.
7. Beijaard, D.,Verloop, N.,Vermunt, J. D.(2000).Teachers' perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective.Teaching and teacher education,16,749-764.
8. Cohen, J. L.(2008).That's not treating you as a professional': Teachers constructing complex professional identities through talk.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,14(2),79-93.
9. Foucault, M.(1977).Discipline and punish: the birth of prison.New York:Vintage.
10. Freire, P.(1985).The politics of education: Culture, power and liberation.South Hadley, MA:Bergin & Garvey.
11. Giddens, A.,趙旭東（譯）,方文（譯）(1991).現代性與自我認同.臺北:左岸.
12. Hargreaves, A.(1994).Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age.London:Cassell.
13. Hopkins, L.(2001).Creating an activist voice: Re-storying the self in the light of contemporary feminist understandings of power and subjectivity.Journal of International Women's Studies,2(2),1-21.
14. Hung, Hsiu-ting(2008).Teacher learning: Reflective practice as a site of engagement for professional Identity Construction.US-China Education Review,5(5),39-49.
15. Kelchtermans, G.(1993).Getting the story, understanding the lives: From career stories to teachers' professional development.Teaching and Teacher Education,9,443-456.
16. Luehmann, A. L.(2008).Using blogging in support of teacher professional identity development: A case study.The journal of the learning sciences,17,287-337.
17. Luhmann, N.(1990).Essays on Self-Reference.New York:Columbia University Press.
18. Pinar, W. F.(ed.)(1998).Curriculum: Toward new identities.New York:Garland Publishing.
19. Ruthford, J.(ed.)(1990).Modernity and it futures.Cambridge:Polity Press.
20. Sachs, J.(2001).Teacher professional identity: Competing discourse, competing outcomes.Journal of Educational Policy,16(2),149-161.
21. Spillane, J.(2004).Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
22. 王儷靜、邱淑玫(2002)。成為教師：師院生的專業認同。教育研究月刊，99，58-72。
23. 卯靜如(2004)。理論化女性教師的性別意識與認同建構過程。通識教育季刊，1(1/2)，147-170。
24. 吳慎慎(2001)。性別與教師的專業認同：女性主義的觀點。藝術評論，12，181-201。
25. 吳慎慎(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所。
26. 李文惠(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
27. 姜添輝(1999)。教師專業與教育改革。師鐸，15，75-82。
28. 洪瑞璇(2007)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系。
29. 許誌庭(2004)。從結構主義的觀點論重塑教師專業發展的學校組織再造。國民教育研究學報，13，123-146。
30. 許麗萍(2008)。吉登斯生活政治範式研究。北京:人民出版社。
31. 陳薇薇(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所。
32. 賴光祺(2007)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立政治大學教育研究所。
33. 戴文青(2005)。從深層結構論臺灣幼兒園教師專業認同轉化的可能性。南大學報，39(2)，19-42。

1. (2011)。學校場域共識動員之研究：以2010桃園縣八德國中霸凌新聞報導為例。教育研究，19，1-18。