國民小學候用校長培訓課程對領導效能感影響之研究

Research on the Relationships between Training Program for Principalship and Efficacy of Leadership in Elementary Schools

10.6423/HHHC.201011.0051

謝傳崇(Chuan-Chung Hsieh)；林和春(He-Chun Lin)

國小候用校長 ； 校長培訓 ； 領導效能感 ； elementary school prospective principals ； training program for principalship ； efficacy of leadership

學校行政

70期（2010 / 11 / 01）

51 - 68

繁體中文

校長是學校的領導者，對學校教育的影響鉅大，因此深入探討候用校長培訓課程對校長領導效能感的影響，可以提供校長培訓課程之改進參考，以培養具備領導能力的未來學校領導人。本研究係以九十五學年度苗栗縣國民小學校長甄試所錄取之候用校長15位為研究對象，首先透過文獻探討建立國民小學校長領導效能感的概念架構，再透過內容分析、調查問卷、檢核表與半結構性之個別訪談等方法，於候用校長培訓過程前後蒐集相關資料，進行綜合分析，以瞭解各項培訓課程對候用校長領導效能感發展之影響，並據以提出結論與建議。本研究之主要結論如下：（一）候用校長經過培訓課程後，領導效能感顯著增長。（二）校長培訓課程對領導效能感發揮多元影響作用。

This study was to investigate the process of efficacy of leadership for prospective principals in elementary schools, and at the same time to audit effects and related factors of a training program designed especially for prospective principals. Firstly, this researcher established a conceptual framework of efficacy on administrative leadership by literature review. Then, using 15 qualified prospective principals as subjects, a training program for prospective principals initiated in the summer of year 2006 was analyzed. Research methods such as content analysis, questionnaire, checklist, and semi-structured individual interview were adopted to collect relevant data for analyzing and understanding the effects and related factors of this training program on prospective principals' efficacy of leadership. Based on findings of this research, conclusions were synthesized and suggestions for educational practice, especially for training of principal-ship, and further study were provided. Major conclusions of this research were as the followings: (1) The influence on prospective principals' efficacy of leadership during the training stages depends mainly on contents of training curriculum and activity. (2) The mode of influence on prospective principals' efficacy of leadership during the training stages is somewhat different.

1. Hopkins, D. (2000). Welcome national college for school leadership to school of education in Nottingham University. Retrieved March 16, 2010, from http://www.Nottingham.ac.uk/education/ latestnews/leadership.htm.
2. Bandura, A.(1982).Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist,37,147-322.
3. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York:W.H. Freeman.
4. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, N.Y.:Prentice Hall.
5. Conley, D. T.(1992).,未出版
6. DeMoulin, D. F.(1992).,未出版
7. Dimmock, C.,Hattie, J.(1996).School principals' self-efficacy and its measurement in a context of restructuring.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,7(1),62-75.
8. Edwards, W. L.(2001).School leadership: The crucial factor for successful schools.the International Conference on School Leader Preparation, Licensure/Certification, Selection, Evaluation, and Professional Development,Taipei:
9. Fuller, B.,Wood, K.,Rapoport, T.,Dornbusch, S.(1982).The organizational context of individual efficacy.Review of Educational Research,52,7-30.
10. Gibson, S.,Dembo, M.(1984).Teacher efficacy: A construct validation.Journal of Educational Psychology,76(4),569-582.
11. Gist, M. E.,Mitchell, T. R.(1992).Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability.Academy of Management Review,17(2),183-211.
12. Gregory, S. T.(2003).Leadership styles and characteristics of effective principals in highpoverty public schools.the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Chicago:
13. Hoy, W. K.,Miskel, C. G.(2001).Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice.New York:McGraw-Hill.
14. Hughes, R. L.,Ginnett, R. C.,Murphy, G. J.(1996).Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience.Chicago, IL:IRWIN.
15. Imants, J. G. M.,DeBrbander, C. J.(1996).Teachers' and principals' sense of efficacy in elementary schools.Teaching and Teacher Education,12(2),179-195.
16. Lashway, L.(1997).,未出版
17. Lunenburg, F. C.(1995).The principalship: Concepts and applications.Eaglewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice Hall.
18. Lyons, C.,Murphy, M. J.(1994).,未出版
19. McGrevin, C. Z.,Schemider, J. H.(1993).Keys to success: Critical skills for the novice principal.the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Atlanta, GA:
20. Muscella, D.(1987).Uncovering beliefs about learning: Multimetthod, multitrait research.the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
21. Osterman, K.,Sullivan, S.(1996).New principals in an urban bureaucracy: A sense of efficacy.Journal of School Leadership,6(6),666-691.
22. Painter, S. R.(2000).Principals' efficacy beliefs about teacher evaluation.Journal of Educational Administration,38(4),368-378.
23. Rantz, L. D.(2002).Saint Louis University.
24. Schunk, D.(1984).Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior.Educational Psychologist,19,48-58.
25. Tschannen-Moran.,Hoy, W. K.(2001).Teachers efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct.Teaching & Teacher,17,783-805.
26. Wang, L.,Ertmer, P. A.(2003).,未出版
27. 王如哲(2001)。知識經濟時代校長領導能力分析。中小學校長培育、認證、甄選、評鑑與專業發展國際學術研討會，臺北市:
28. 王麗雲(2000)。臺南縣政府教育局專案報告臺南縣政府教育局專案報告,未出版
29. 朱陳翰思(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所。
30. 江文雄(1999)。臺北市中小學校長評鑑方案之探討。臺北市:臺北市政府教育局。
31. 吳清山(1992)。學校效能研究。臺北市:五南。
32. 林文律(2000)。學校行政：理想與實際。學校行政，6，24-37。
33. 林文律(2002)。國立臺北師範學院校長中心經營現況及未來展望。校長專業發展國際研討會論文集，臺北市:
34. 林和春(2007)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所。
35. 林明地(2002)。學校領導：理念與校長專業生涯。臺北市:高等。
36. 林明地譯、Hoy, W.、Miskel, C. G.(2003)。教育行政學。高雄市:麗文。
37. 林漢政(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，國立中正大學教育研究所。
38. 孫志麟(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立政治大學教育研究所。
39. 張明輝(2004)。從後現代觀點看學校校長的關鍵能力。現代教育論壇—從後現代看校長核心能力的轉變，臺北市:
40. 張素貞(1999)。國民小學校長評核制度之研究。臺北市:臺北縣政府教育局。
41. 陳木金(2004)。校長專業套裝知識的解構與校長現場經驗知識的復活。現代教育論壇—從後現代看校長核心能力的轉變，臺北市:
42. 葉連祺、倪千茹(2001)。教育行政理論介紹（一）：領導篇。教育研究月刊，91，95-104。
43. 蔡進雄(2004)。校長自我效能感之模式建構及其提升策略。國教學報，16，235-248。
44. 賴慧玲(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所。
45. 謝文全(1997)。學校行政。臺北市:五南圖書出版社。
46. 顏淑惠(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。

1. (2019)。校長領導研究之統合分析。教育研究月刊，299，126-143。
2. (2021)。國民中小學候用校長教學領導指標之建構。教育政策論壇，24(1)，41-80。