國民小學校長對績效管理的覺知

Elementary School Principals' Perception of Performance Management

10.6423/HHHC.201105.0157

曾兆興(Chao-Hsin Tseng)

校長 ； 管理 ； 覺知 ； 績效管理 ； principals ； management ； perceptions ； performance management

學校行政

73期（2011 / 05 / 01）

157 - 183

繁體中文

在績效責任的時代，教師與學校行政人員視績效管理為一種良方。教師透過讚賞與績效獎金策略的運用，來提升教育專業尊嚴與教學效能。學校行政人員則利用它來做為評鑑過程的一部分，以引導改進教師的低效能。本研究的目的旨在探究國民小學校長對績效管理的覺知。為此，研究者以訪談法來蒐集資料，並設計半結構的題目來探討績效管理的不同層面。研究對象共抽樣四位彰化縣國民小學校長。研究結果顯示績效管理能扮演診斷問題與改進學校效能的功能，並引導學校進步與發展。研究發現績效管理的層面涵括，1.覺知的力量：績效的圖像與溝通的氣氛、2.行動的脈絡：績效的執行與教育的脈絡、3.轉型的反思：管理的風格與嵌入現場的覺知等。最後，研究者依據結論提出建議，以供教育實務工作者、教育行政當局與未來研究者改進學校效能與提昇績效管理效果的參考。

The era of accountability, performance management could be seen as a lifeline for both teachers and school administrators. Teacher's education professional dignity and teaching effectiveness can be raised through praising and performance award strategies. School administrators might use it as part of evaluation process, which led to improve teacher's underperformance. The purpose of this study is to explore the elementary school principals' perception of performance management. Data were collected via interviews, and a semi-structured interview protocol was designed to probe a variety of dimensions related to the performance management. Participants involved four elementary principals from Changhua County. The results show that performance management can play a significant role in diagnosing problem and improving school effectiveness simultaneously. It will also lead school into progress and development. This study on the dimension of performance management findings were as follow: 1. The force of perception involved an image of performance and the climate of communication. 2. The context of action involved the implementation of performance management and the educational context. 3. The transformative reflection involved the management style and the extent to which performance management embedded. Finally, based on the conclusion of this study, the researcher proposes several suggestions to the education practitioners, education administrative authority and future researchers to improve the school effectiveness and to raise the effect of performance management.

1. Armstrong, M.(2006).Performance management: Key strategies and practical guidelines.London:Kogan Page.
2. Aseltine, J. M.,Faryniarz, J. O.,Rigazio-DiGilio, A. J.(2006).Supervision for learning: A performance-based approach to teacher development and school.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3. Bottery, M.(2003).The leadership of learning communities in a culture of unhappiness.School Leadership and Management,23(2),187-207.
4. Burke, R. J.(ed.),Cooper, C. L.(ed.)(2009).The peak performing organization.London:Routledge.
5. Bush, T.(ed.),Bell, L.(ed.),Middlewood, D.(ed.)(2010).The principles of educational leadership and management.Los Angeles, CA:Sage.
6. Buytendijk, F.(2009).Performance leadership: The next practices to motivate your people, align stakeholders, and lead your industry.New York:McGraw-Hill.
7. Campbella, J. R.,Vemab, M. A.(2007).Effective parental influence: Academic home climate linked to children's achievement.Educational Research and Evaluation,13(6),501-519.
8. Cokins, G.(2009).Performance management: Integrating strategy exection, methodologies, risk, and analytics.Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
9. Dean, J.(2002).Implementing performance management: A handbook for schools.London:RoutledgeFalmer.
10. Drysdale, L.,Goode, H.,Gurr, D.(2009).An Australian model of successful school leadership: Moving from success to sustainability.Journal of Educational Administration,47(6),697-708.
11. Earley, P.,Weindling, D.(2004).Understanding school leadership.London:Sage.
12. Fitzgerald, T.,Youngs, H.,Grootenboer, P.(2003).Bureaucratic control or professional autonomy?: Performance management in New Zealand school.School Leadership and Management,23(1),91-105.
13. Goulding, C.(2002).Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers.London:Sage.
14. Grace, G.(1995).School leadership: Beyond education management.Abingdon, Oxon:RoutledgeFalmer.
15. Gunter, H. M.(2001).Leaders and leadership in education.London:Paul Chapman.
16. Hargreaves, A.(1994).Changing teachers changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age.London:Cassell.
17. Hartle, F.,Everall, K.,Baker, C.(2001).Getting the best out of Performance management in your school.London:Kogan Page.
18. Haynes, G.,Wragg, T.,Wragg C.,Chamberlin, R.(2003).Performance management for teachers: Head teachers' perspectives.School Leadership and Management,23(1),75-89.
19. Jameson, J.,McNay, I.(2007).Ultimate FE leadership and management handbook.New York:Continuum.
20. Jones, J.,Jenkin, M.,Lord, Su.(2006).Development effective teacher performance.London:Paul Chapman.
21. Kaser, L.,Halbert, J.(2009).Leadership mindsets: Innovation and learning in the transformation of schools.London:Routledge.
22. Lee, J.(2010).Trick or treat: New ecology of education accountability system in the USA.Journal of Education Policy,25(1),73-93.
23. Leithwood, K.(ed.),Day, C.(ed.)(2007).Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective.New York, NY:Springer.
24. Mone, E. M.,London, M.(2010).Employee engagement: Through effective performance management.New York, NY:Routledge.
25. Moon, B.(ed.),Butcher, J.(ed.), Bird, E.(ed.)(2000).leading professional development in education.London:Routledge.
26. Moreland, J.(2009).Investigating secondary school leaders' perceptions of performance management.Educational Management Administration and Leadership,37(6),735-765.
27. Murgatroyd, S.,Morgan, C.(1992).Total quality management and the school.Buckingham:Open University Press.
28. Osborne, S. P.,Brown, K.(2005).Managing change and innovation in public service organizations.London:Routledge.
29. Parkay, F. W.,Stanford, B. H.(2001).Becoming a teacher.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
30. Patterson, J.,Kelleher, P.(2005).Resilient school leaders: Strategies for turning adversity into achievement.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
31. Purcell, J.,Kinnie, N.,Swart, J.,Rayton, B.,Hutchinson, S.(2009).People management and performance.Abingdon, Oxon:Routledge.
32. Reeves, J.,Forde, C.,O''Brien, J.,Smith, P.,Tomlinson, H.(2002).Performance management in education: Improving practice.London:Paul Chapman.
33. Skarzynski, P.,Gibson, R.(2008).Innovation to the core: A blueprint for transforming the way your company innovates.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
34. Sloane, P.(2007).The innovative leader: How to inspire your team and drive creativity.London:Kogan Page.
35. Smith, R. E.(2009).Human resources administration: A school-based perspective.Larchmont, NY:Eye on Education.
36. Storey, A.(2002).Performance management in schools: Could the balanced scorecard help?.School Leadership & Management,22(3),321-338.
37. Strauss, A. L.,Corbin, J.(1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and Tecchniques.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
38. Strauss, A. L.、Corbin, J.、吳芝儀譯、廖梅花譯(2001)。紮根理論研究方法。嘉義市:濤石。
39. Tomlinson, H.(2000).Proposals for performance related pay for teachers in english school.School Leadership and Management,20(3),281-298.
40. Tomlinson, H.(ed.)(1992).Performance related pay in education.London:Routledge.
41. Varma, A.(ed.),Budhwar, P. S.(ed.),Denisi, A.(ed.)(2008).Performance management systems: A global perspective.London:Routledge.
42. Wragg, E. C.,Wikeley, F. J.,Wragg, C. M.,Haynes, G. S.(1996).Teacher appraisal observed.London:Routledge.
43. 曾振興(2009)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
44. 鄭新輝(2010)。連結校長評鑑、專業發展與學校持續改進的可行模式：以改進為焦點的校長績效管理。2010兩岸三地校長學學術研討會─校長的學習與學校的改進