宜蘭縣國民小學校長轉型、互易領導與學校競爭優勢關係之研究

A Study of the Relationships among Principal's Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, and School Competitive Advantages in the Elementary Schools of Yilan County

10.6423/HHHC.201111.0001

范熾文(Chi-Win Fun)；張淑芬(Shu-Fen Chang)

轉型領導 ； 互易領導 ； 學校競爭優勢 ； transformational leadership ； transactional leadership ； school competitive advantages

學校行政

76期（2011 / 11 / 01）

1 - 23

繁體中文

本研究的目的在探討宜蘭縣國民小學校長轉型、互易領導與學校競爭優勢的關係，研究方法主要採取文獻分析與調查研究方法。調查研究以宜蘭縣2053位正式教師為母群體進行抽樣，共抽取526位教師為樣本，有效問卷425份。調查資料以分別以描述統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、Scheffé事後比較法、Pearson積差相關與逐步多元迴歸分析進行資料分析，得到下列幾項結論：一、教師知覺校長轉型、互易領導與學校競爭優勢現況表現均屬中上程度。二、不同性別、年齡、年資、學歷及擔任職務對於校長轉型、互易領導與學校競爭優勢分數無顯著差異，而在小型學校任教之教師所知覺校長轉型、互易領導對學校競爭優勢分數則較高。三、校長表現高度轉型、互易領導，會有較高的學校競爭優勢。四、校長運用智性激勵、例外管理及分享願景等，能有效提升學校競爭優勢，其中以智性激勵之解釋力最高。

This study is aimed to investigate the relationships among Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, and School Competitive Advantages in the Elementary schools of Yilan County. The primary research methods employed include literature review and quantitative research methods. For the quantitative research method, a survey was conducted in Yilan county by sampling 526 in-service teachers from a population of 2053 teachers in 75 public elementary schools. 425 responses were recognized as valid and analyzed via descriptive statistics, t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Scheffé methods, Pearson product-moment correlation, and MultipleRegression. Based on the statistical results, four conclusions were found: 1) Teachers perceived a moderate degree of associations among principals' transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and school competitive advantages in pre- and in-service teaching education training. 2) There is no significant difference of the principals' transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and school competitive advantages among different genders, age, career, education, and positions. However, teachers who teachers in a small school have higher sense of the principals’ transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and school competitive advantages. 3) The principals who have higher scores of transformational leadership and transactional leadership tend to have better scores of school's competitive advantages. 4) The principals who could utilize leading strategies, such as reasonable encouragement, ex ceptional management, and sharing visions, tend to help enhance school's competitive advantages. The influences of reasonable encouragement were found to be the most significant.

1. 王如哲(2001)。知識管理與學校教育革新。教育研究集刊，45，35-54。
   連結：
2. 吳清山、蔡菁芝(2006)。英美兩國教育績效責任之比較分析及其啟示。師大學報（教育類），51(1)，1-21。
   連結：
3. 范熾文(2005)。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。台中大學教育學報，19(2)，1-22。
   連結：
4. Base, B. M.(1985).Leadership and performance beyond expectation.New York:The Free Press.
5. Bass, B. M.,Avolio, B. J.(1994).Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership.California:SAGE Publications, Inc..
6. Bass, B. M.,Avolio, B. J.(1990).Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire.Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists.
7. Bryman, A.(1992).Charisma and leadership in organizations.Newbury Park, California:SAGE Publications LTD.
8. Burn, J. M.(1978).Leadership.New York:Harper & Row.
9. Conger, J. A.(1989).The charismatic leader: Behind the mystique of exceptional leadership.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publisher.
10. Conger, J. A.(Ed.),Kanungo, R. N.(Ed.),Associates(Ed.)(1988).Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
11. Eden, D.(1998).The paradox of school leadership.Journal of Educational Administration,36(3),249-260.
12. Etzioni, A.(1964).Modern organizations.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall, Inc..
13. Gross, E.(1967).The definition of organizational goal.British Journal of Sociology,20,287-291.
14. Hoy, W. K.,Miskel, C. G.(1996).Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice.New York:Random House, Inc..
15. Kart, R.,Shamir, B.,Chen, G.(2003).The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency.Journal of Applied psychology,88(2),246-255.
16. Kotter, J. P.(1990).A force for change: How leadership differs from management.New York:The Free Press.
17. Kouzes, J. M.,Posner, B. Z.(1987).The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organization.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
18. Long, C.,Koch, M.(1994).Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage.Oraganizational Dynamics,3(1),7-22.
19. Luo, Y.(2000).Dynamic capabilities in international expansion.Journal of world Business,35(4),355-378.
20. Matthews, L. J.(2001).Glassboro, NJ,Rowan University.
21. Miller, D.,Mifflin, K. E.(2000).Strategic integration: Competing in the age of capabilities.Californian Management Review,40(3),118-147.
22. Porter, M. E.(2008).On competitive.Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
23. Porter, M. E.(1985).Competitive advantage.N.Y.:Free Press.
24. Porter, M. E.(1990).The competitive advantage of nation.N.Y.:Free Press.
25. Sarros, J. C.,Santora, J. C.(2001).The transformational- transactional leadership model in practice.Leadership & Organization Development Journal,22,383-393.
26. Sergiovanni, T. J.(1990).Value-added leadership: How to get extraordinary performance in schools.New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27. Silins, H. C.(1994).The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,5(3),272-298.
28. Sims, R. R.(Ed.)(2002).Changing the way we manage change.Westport, CT:Quorum Books.
29. 吳明雄(2010)。博士論文(博士論文)。台中，國立台中教育大學教育學系。
30. 吳清山(1993)。學校行政領導的新取向。教育研究，32，13-18。
31. 吳清山(1996)。教育發展與教育改革。台北:心理。
32. 吳清山、林天祐(1998)。轉型領導、互易領導。教育資料與研究，24，63-64。
33. 林合懋(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立政治大學教育研究所。
34. 林漢政(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義，國立中正大學教育研究所。
35. 秦夢群(1997)。教育行政：理論部分。台北:五南。
36. 高強華編(1997)。學校教育革新專輯。台北:國立師範大學。
37. 張明輝(1991)。巴納德組織理論與教育行政。台北:五南。
38. 張明輝(1999)。學校教育與行政革新研究。台北:師大書苑。
39. 張鈿富、葉連祺(2003)。2002年臺灣地區教育政策與實施成效調查。教育政策論壇，6(1)，11-36。
40. 張德銳(1995)。教育行政研究。台北:五南。
41. 張慶勳(1997)。學校組織轉化領導研究。高雄:復文。
42. 張慶勳(1996)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
43. 彭雅珍(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立政治大學教育研究所。
44. 黃強倪(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南，國立成功大學企業管理研究所。
45. 濮世偉(2003)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北，國立政治大學教育研究所。
46. 鍾炳雄(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學教育學系。

1. 鄭彩鳳、鄭玉菁(2014)。校長轉型領導、教師對組織變革接受度與學校競爭優勢關係之研究。當代教育研究季刊，22(1)，1-46。