|
英文摘要
|
The purpose of this article was to inquire the meaning of reflection practice in educational administration. First, it analyzes importance of the refection practice in educational administration; Second, it analyzes meaning of the refection practice in educational administration.; Third, it evaluates the bureaucrat system; Fourth, it analyzes separation phenomenon between educational administration theory and practice; Fifth, it analyzes managerialism of educational administration; Finally, methods of administrator' reflection practice were made as followings: metaphor, administration dialogue, role acting and case discusses, observation refection ,writing reflection.
|
|
参考文献
|
-
Taylor, F. W. (1911) The principles of scientific management. New York : Harper.
-
黃武雄（ 2000 ）。公民社會與教育改革。 2004 年 5 月 11 日取自： http://www.community-univ.org.tw/about/公民社會與教育改革 .htm
-
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York : Macmillan.
-
Bottery, M.(1992).The ethics of educational management: Personal, social and political perspectives on school organization.New York:Cassell.
-
Burbles, N. C.,Rice, S.(1991).Dialogue across difference: Continuing the conversation.Harvard Education Review,61(4),393-416.
-
Burrell, G.,Morgan, G.(1979).Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis.London:Heinemann.
-
Callahon, R.(1960).Education and the cult of efficiency.Chicago, ILL.:Chicago University Press.
-
Denhardt, R. B.(1984).Theories of public organization.Monterey:Bood Cole Publishing.
-
Denhardt, R. B.(1981).In the shadow of organization.Lawrence:The Regents press of knows.
-
Fay, B.(1975).Social theory and political practice.London:George Allen & Unwin.
-
Greenfield, T. B.(Ed.),Ribbins, P.(Ed.)(1993).Greenfield on educational administration.London:Routledge.
-
Harmon, M. M.(1981).Action theory for public administration.N. Y.:Longman.
-
Harmon, M. M.,Mayer, R. T.(1986).Organization theory for public administration.Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
-
Jackson, N.,Carter, P.(1991).In defense of paradigm. Incommensurability.Organization Studies,12,109-127.
-
Jun, J. S.(1986).Public administration : Design and Problem Solving.New York:Publishing Company.
-
Lakoff, G .,Johnson, M.(1980).Metaphors we lire by.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
-
Merseth, K. K.(1997).Case in educational administration.New York:Longman.
-
Morgan, G.(1986).Images of organization.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications.
-
Postman, N.(1993).Technopoly.New York:Vintage Books.
-
Schon, D.A.(1996).Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, Inc..
-
Simon, H.(1976).Administration behavior : A study of decision making process in administration organization.N. Y.:The Free.
-
Smith, J.(ed.)(1989).Critical perspective on educational leadership.New York:Falmer Press.
-
Smyth, J.(Ed.)(1989).Critical perspectives on educational leadership.New York:Falmer.
-
Starratt, R. J.(1994).Building on ethical school.London:The Falmer press.
-
Wamsley, G. L.(Ed.),Wolf, J. F.(Ed.)(1966).Refounding democratic public administration : Modern paradoxes, postmodern challenges.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
-
Zeichner, K. M.,Liston, D. P(1987).Teaching student teacher to reflect.Harvard Educational Review,57(1),23-48.
-
王麗雲(1999)。案例教學法之理論與實務。課程與教學季刊，2(3)，117-134。
-
吳清基(1986)。塞蒙行政決定理論與教育行政。臺北市:五南。
-
邱秀祝(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立政治大學教育研究所。
-
秦夢群(1997)。教育行政：理論部分。臺北市:五南。
-
秦夢群、黃貞裕(2001)。教育行政研究方法論。臺北市:五南。
-
張民杰(2001)。博士論文(博士論文)。師大。
-
張明輝(1997)。學校組織的變革與教育品質。「現代教育論壇―學校經營與教育品質」研討會，臺北市:
-
許立一(2003)。,未出版
-
陳伯璋(1987)。教育思想與教育研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
-
陳依萍(2002)。反省實踐取向教育人員專業發展：以校長為例。臺北市:師大書苑。
-
陳惠邦(1998)。教育行動研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
-
黃乃熒(1996)。超越實體本質了解的溝通模式：語言典範與學校行政行動承諾的解讀。教育與心理研究，19，141-168。
-
楊深坑(1997)。溝通理性、生命情境與教育過程。臺北市:師大書苑。
-
楊深坑(1987)。理論、詮釋與實踐。臺北市:師大書苑。
-
廖春文(1995)。廿一世紀教育行政領導理念。臺北市:師大書苑。
-
歐用生(1997)。當前課程改革的檢討。臺北市:師大書苑。
-
潘慧玲編(2001)。教育議題的性別視野。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
-
鄭祥福(1995)。李歐塔。臺北市:生智。
-
謝文全(2003)。教育行政學。臺北市:高等教育。
-
顏良恭(1998)。公共行政中的典範問題。臺北市:五南。
-
魏惠娟(1998)。邁向學習型組織的教育行政領導。教育政策論壇，1，135-173。
|
