大學實施「學生評鑑教師教學」之研究—以南部一所科技大學為例

A Study of Students' Evaluation on Teacher's Teaching-Taking a University of Science and Technology in Southern Taiwan as an Example

10.6423/HHHC.201201.0159

張媛甯(Yuan-Ning Chang)；吳紋菁(Wun-Jing Wu)

學生評鑑教師教學 ； 教學評鑑 ； 有效教學 ； students' evaluation on teacher's teaching ； teaching evaluation ； effective teaching

學校行政

77期（2012 / 01 / 01）

158 - 181

繁體中文

本研究以南部一所科技大學為研究對象，針對該校日間部學生進行問卷調查研究，探討大學實施學生評鑑教師教學之現況，並分析學生相關背景變項與學習影響因素對學生評鑑教師教學的關係。本研究主要獲致以下結論：該科技大學學生對於教師教學表現的評鑑結果，僅教學態度、教學準備以及教學內容向度達到標準；不同背景變項對學生評鑑教師教學的差異分析結果，二技學生高於四技學生、高年級學生高於低年級學生、管理學院高於其他學院學生、選修高於必修課程、研討課程高於實驗實習、一般講授及實作設計課程；學生學習影響因素中，僅有學習興趣與課程理解程度對學生評鑑教師教學具有預測力。最後，對學校、教師、學生及未來研究提出具體建議。

The purpose of this research is to analyze the relations between students' evaluation on teachers' teaching and students' demography factors by taking a university of technology in southern Taiwan as an example. Based on the analyses, the research results are listed below: The results of students for teaching performance evaluation, only teaching attitude, teaching preparation and teaching content dimensions were up to standard; students of two-year bachelor's program had higher significant differences than four-year ones; senior students had higher significant differences than junior ones; students' evaluation on teacher's teaching result in the college of management was higher than other colleges; the students' evaluation on teacher's teaching in electives courses was higher than required courses; seminar courses had higher significant differences than others; studying interest revealed best significant predictors of students' evaluation on teacher's teaching. The study offered some implications for the implementation of teaching evaluation.

1. 張春興(2000)。教育心理學。台北:東華書局。
   連結：
2. Leland Stanford Junior University (2006). Interpreting and working with your course evaluation. Retrieved September 25, 2010 from http://ctl.stanford.edu/interpret.pdf
3. 教育部（ 2010 ）。中華民國教育統計。台北：教育部統計處。
4. Helen S. & Veronique J. (2000). SRP, Napier University Staff Conference 2002..
5. Cornell University Teaching Evaluation Handbook (1996). Retrieved September 12, 2010 from http://www.clt.cornell.edu/resources/teh/teh.html.
6. Australian Learning and Teaching Council(2008). ALTC Awards Guidelines and Forms. Retrieved May 25, 2011 from http://www.altc.edu.au/carrick/go/home/awards/pid/64.
7. Neal, J. E.(1988). Faculty evaluation: Its purposes and effectiveness. ERIC Digest. Retrieved March 9, 2011, from http://ericae.net/db/edo/ED308800.htm
8. Abrami, P. C.,Murphy, V.(1980).A catalogue of systems for student ratings of instruction.Montreal, Quebec, Canada:Center for Teaching and Learning Services, McGill University.
9. Aleamoni, L.(1987).Student ratings myths versus research facts.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,1,111-119.
10. Bandura, A.(1977).Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review,84,191-215.
11. Basow, S. A.,Silberg, N. T.(1987).Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently?.Journal of Educational Psychology,79(2),308-314.
12. Brandenburg, D. C.,Slinde, J. A.,Batista, E. E.(1977).Student ratings of instruction: validity and normative interpretations.Journal of Research in Higher Education,7,67-78.
13. Braskamp, L.,Brandenberg, D.,Ory, J.(1984).Evaluating teaching effectiveness: A practical guide.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
14. Calderon, T. G.,Cabbin, A. L.,Green, B. P.(1995).,Sarasota, FL:American Accounting Association.
15. Cashin, W.(1989).Defining and evaluating college teaching.Manhattan, KS:Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
16. Cashin, W.(1990).Student ratings of teaching; Recommendations for use.Manhattan, KS:Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
17. Cashin, W. E.(1992).Student ratings: The need for comparative data.Instructional Evaluation and Faculty Development,12,146.
18. Centra, J. A(1993).Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
19. Centra, J. A.,Creech, F. R.(1976).The relationship between student teachers and course characteristics and student ratings of teacher effectiveness.Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Servic.
20. Cerrito, P. B.(2000).An examination of college-wide student teaching evaluations.College Student Journal,34,165-172.
21. Chau, H.,Hocevar, D.(1994).Higher-order factor analysis of multidimensional student's evaluations of teaching effectiveness.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New Orleans, LA:
22. Chickering, A. W.,Gamson, Z. F.(1991).Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education.New Directions for Teaching and Learning,47
23. Feldman, K. A.(1988).Effective college teaching from the students' and faculty's view: matched or mismatched priorities?.Research in Higher Education,28(4),291-344.
24. Feldman, K. A.(1977).Consistency and variability among college students in their ratings among courses: A review and analysis.Research in Higher Education,6(3),223-274.
25. Gibson, S. D.,Demo, M. H.(1984).Teacher efficacy: A construct validation.Journal of Educational Psychology,76(4),569-582.
26. Greenwald, A. G.,Gillmore, G. M.(1997).Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings.American Psychologist,52(11),1209-1217.
27. Hachtmann, F,Signal, S.(2005).The peer review of teaching portfolio as scholarship assessment in higher education.International Journal of Learning,12(5),31-40.
28. Haigh, N.,Katterns, R.(1984).Teacher effectiveness: Problem or goal for teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education,33(5),23-27.
29. King, A. S.(1983).How students size up prospective classes.Journal of Business Education,12,220-223.
30. Kwan, Kam-Por(1999).How Fair are Student Ratings in Assessing the Teaching Performance of University Teachers?.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,24(2),181-196.
31. Lam L. W.(2003).The University of Hong Kong.
32. Marks, Ronald B.(2000).Determinants of student evaluations of global measures of instructor and course value.Journal of Marketing Education,22(2),108-119.
33. Marsh, H. W.(1984).Student' evaluation of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility.Journal of Educational Psychology,76(5),707-754.
34. Marsh, H. W.(1987).Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research.International Journal of Educational Research,11,253-388.
35. McGrath, E. J.(1970).Should student share the power?.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
36. Medley(1979).An analysis of science teachers' belief about teacher classroom behaviors.Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching
37. Millman, J.(1981).Handbook of teacher evaluation.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
38. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
39. Peterson, K. D.(1995).Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press, Inc.
40. Prave, R.,Baril, G.(1993).Instructor ratings: Controlling for bias from initial student interest.Journal of Education for Business,68(6),362-366.
41. Ramsden, P.(1991).A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire.Studies in Higher Education,16(2),129-150.
42. Rodewald, H. K.,Carroll, J. L.(1974).Problem in use of student ratings of student ratings of faculty.Perceptual and Motor Skills,38,574.
43. Schlenker, D. E.,Mckinnon, N. C.(1994).Assessing faculty performance using the student evaluation of instruction.New Brunswich, Canada:Atlantic Baptist College.
44. Shamanske, S.(1988).On the measurement of teacher effectiveness.Journal of Economic Education,19(4),307-314.
45. Tang, L. P.(1997).Teaching evaluation at a public institution of higher eeducation: Factors related to overall teaching effectiveness.Public Personal Management,26(3),379-389.
46. 中國教育學會編(1995)。教育評鑑。台北:師大書苑。
47. 林珊如(1999)。大學生評鑑教學量表：編制及效度考驗。教育與心理研究，22，295-322。
48. 崔長風(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，中華大學資訊工程學系。
49. 張倍禎(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，淡江大學教育科技學系。
50. 張德勝(1998)。學生評鑑教師教學─以花蓮師範學院為例。86學年度師範教育學術論文集
51. 張德勝(2000)。師範學院師生對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度之研究。台北:五南。
52. 張德勝(2000)。「學生評鑑教師教學」制度之比較：以師範學院為例。89 學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集，新竹:
53. 張德勝(1999)。教學科目與教師性別對學生評鑑教師教學結果之影響。國立花蓮師範學院學報，9，345-366。
54. 張德勝(2002)。學生評鑑教師教學：理論、實務與態度。台北市:揚智。
55. 張德銳編、簡紅珠編、裘友善編、高淑芳編、張美玉編、成虹飛編(1996)。發展性教師評鑑系統。台北:五南。
56. 莊靜君(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹，國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所。
57. 陳木金(1999)。班級經營。台北:揚智文化。
58. 陳珮軒(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，長庚大學管理學院。
59. 陳琦媛(2007)。大學教學評鑑的新途徑─同儕評鑑。評鑑雙月刊，9，21-23。
60. 曾憲揚(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南，國立成功大學企業管理研究所。
61. 黃光雄(1989)。教育評鑑。台北:師大書苑。
62. 黃孟樑(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所。
63. 黃政傑(1999)。落實教學評鑑的實施。教師天地，99，39-45。
64. 楊盛輝(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東，國立屏東科技大學技術與職業教育研究所。
65. 廖欣楣(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮，國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所。
66. 戴佑全(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。

1. (2013)。資源班教師的教學效能之研究─以北區國小學習障礙學生的觀點為例。東臺灣特殊教育學報，15，141-168。