中小學教師進修及進階政策之分析

Analysis on the In-service Teacher Education and Career Ladder Policy for Teachers in the High School and Elementary School

10.3966/160683002013050085009

劉鎮寧(Jen-Ning Liou)

教師進修 ； 教師進階 ； 專業發展 ； in-service teacher education ； teacher career ladder ； professional development

學校行政

85期（2013 / 05 / 16）

173 - 189

繁體中文

本文主要目的係針對教育部2009年9月公布的中小學教師素質提升方案，以及2012年12月公布的中華民國師資培育白皮書，有關教師進修及進階的政策內容進行探究。結果發現，教師進修及進階政策的發展，從延續性和整體性的角度論之，具有下列六點優勢：1.建構以職涯發展為基礎的在職進修系統架構；2.從三級教師進修體系提升為五個層級的縱向連結與互動；3.從教師進修研習的倡議者、提供者，轉為兼具實務、評鑑和教師本位的實踐；4.將全國教師在職進修資訊網納入教師專業發展整合平臺；5.完整的闡述多元化教師在職進修型態與方式；6.具體提出教師生涯進階的制度與做法，接著本文進一步提出二點省思之意見，最後綜以結語。

This article is devoted to investigate the framework of the ”in-service teacher education” and ”career ladder policy” for teachers due to the quality enhancement project for teachers of high school and elementary school as announced on by the Ministry of Education (2009), and the teachers incubation white paper for the Republic of China (2012) respectively. Based on the viewpoints of the completeness and the continuity, it was found that the development advantages of in-service teacher education and career ladder policy for teachers are as follows: 1.Construct in-service teacher education system framework based on career development; 2.promotion from a three-layer in-service teacher education system for teachers into five-layer longitudinal linking and interaction; 3.the transition from the proposer and provider of in-service teacher education into the implementation possessing practical consideration, assessment and teacher-oriented basis; 4.include the nation-wide information web of in-service teacher education for teachers into the professional development integration platform for teachers; 5.describe thoroughly the form and method of diversified teachers' in-service teacher education; 6.provide solid suggestions of system and method of teacher career ladder. Further, two viewpoints for meditation and conclusion are proposed.

1. 黃淑苓(2005)。教師專業發展的應然與實然。教育科學期刊，5(2)，154-168。
   連結：
2. Scottish Executive (2004). Professional review and development. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/01/18732/31532
3. General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland (2005). GTCNI reviews of teacher competences and continuing professional development.Retrieved from http://www.gtcni.org.uk//publications/uploads/document/Teacher%20Education%20Report.pdf
4. 呂錘卿（2010）。中小學教師在職進修之趨勢與規劃。擷取自 http://www2.inservice.edu.tw/EPaper/ep2/indexView.aspx?EID=381
5. 行政院教育改革審議委員會（ 1996 ）。教育改革總諮議報告書。臺北市：作者。
6. Training and Development Agency for Schools (2008). What are the professional standards. Retrieved from http://www.tda.gov.uk/teachers/continuingprofessionalde-velopment/cpd_guidance/schoo/_policy.aspx
7. General Teaching Council for England (2003). Commitment: The teachers' professional learning framework. Retrieved fromhttp://www.gtce.org.uk/publications/pub_tplf/
8. 教育部（2009）。中小學教師素質提升方案。臺北市：作者。
9. Training and Development Agency for Schools (2007). Supporting the leadership of Continuing professional development schools. Retrieved from http://www.tda.gov.uk/upload/resourses/pdf/cpd/supporting_leadership_cpd.pdf
10. General Teaching Council for England (2007). Making CPD better: Bringing together research about CPD. Retrieved fromhttp://www.gtce.org.uk/publications/pub_tplf/
11. 中國大陸國家人力資源和社會保障部、教育部（ 2010 ）。深化中小學教師職稱制度改革試點工作資料彙編。擷取自 http://wenku.baidu.com/view/3e4f7768a45177232f60a260.html
12. Pedder, D., Storey, A. & Opfer, V. D. (2008). Schools and continuing professional development(CPD) in England –State of the nation research project. Retrieved from http://www.tda.gov.uk/upload/resources/pdf/s/stateofthenation_report.pdf
13. Covino, E. A.,Iwanicki, E. F.(1996).Experienced teachers: Their constructs of effective teaching.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,10(4),325-363.
14. Day, C.(Ed.),Calderhead, J.(Ed.),Denicolo, P.(Ed.)(1993).Research on teacher thinking : Understanding professional development.New York, NY:Routledge.
15. Department for Children School and Families(2009).School teachers' pay and conditions and document 2009 and guidance on school teachers' pay and conditions.London, UK:TSO.
16. Diaz-Maggioli, G.(2004).Teacher-centered professional development.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17. Dipaola, M. F.,Hoy, W. K.(2008).Principals improving instruction: supervision, evaluation, and professional development.Boston, MA:A&B/Pearson.
18. Forrester, G.(2005).All in a day's work: Primary teachers performing and caring.Gender and Education,17(3),271-287.
19. Gray, J.(2000).Teachers at the center: A memoir of the early years of the national writing project.Berkeley, CA:National Writing Project Corporation.
20. Guskey, T. R.(2000).Evaluating professional development.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
21. Hatch, T.,White, M.E.,Capitelli, S.(2005).Learning from teaching: What's involved in the development of classroom practice?.Cambridge Journal of Education,35(3),323-331.
22. Houston, R.(Ed.)(1990).Handbook of research on teacher education.New York, NY:MacMillan Publishing.
23. Sparks, D.,Hirsch, S.(1997).A new vision for staff development.:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24. Tallerico, M.(2005).Supporting and sustaining teachers' professional development-A principal's guide.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
25. Tiemann, S.(2004).Innovative and individualized teacher professional development.Houston, TX:Houston University Press.
26. Walker, A.,Dimmock, C.(2002).School leadership & administration.New York, NY:Routledge.
27. 何文純(2010)。我國高級中等以下教師分級制度政策之探討。E-SOC JOURNA，85
28. 李麗芬、陳益興、郭淑芳、陳盛賢、楊思偉、連啟瑞、黃坤龍(2009)。,未出版
29. 周宜芳譯、Bagchi, S.(2012)。我專業固我在。臺北市:天下文化。
30. 林純美(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新北市，私立輔仁大學。
31. 教育部(2011)。學校本位暨教師自我專業進修研習規劃服務操作說明手冊。臺北市:作者。
32. 教育部(2012)。中華民國師資培育白皮書。臺北市:作者。
33. 教育部(1994)。第七次全國教育會議實錄。臺北市:作者。
34. 許振東(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化縣，國立彰化師範大學。
35. 陳佳萍、王瑞勳(2011)。教師專業學習社群之探究：以學校文化發展為例。教育研究月刊，208，53-68。
36. 陳厚傑(2011)。法國與日本教師專業發展比較與評析。臺灣教育，671，37-41。
37. 黃德祥、劉欣虹(2010)。美國中小學教師評鑑之政策分析。教育研究月刊，192，101-115。
38. 楊思偉、高新建、陳木金、魯先華、何金針(2006)。建構我國教師進修體系之研究。邁向卓越教育國際研討會，臺北市。:
39. 臺北市。(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
40. 顏國樑(2009)。台灣教師專業發展評鑑執行的問題與推動策略―政策執行的觀點。研習資訊，26(5)，35-46。
41. 蘇進棻(2001)。中共中小學教師分級制度之探討。教育研究資訊，9(2)，58-79。

1. 甘火花(2022)。臺灣國中小、高中教師的班級經營狀況－基於TALIS 2018調查結果分析。學校行政，140，53-83。
2. 鐘郁芳、簡梅瑩(2015)。國小特殊教育教師參與專業研習活動對個人診斷與評量能力發展之研究。特殊教育發展期刊，60，67-82。