英文摘要
|
This objective of this paper is to evaluate the fairness regarding the mechanism of government grants to private universities and colleges. The government gives financial support to private universities and colleges with good performance according to Private School Law. The ultimate grants by Ministry of Education may be bias when school performance indicators cannot reflect substance of the effort made by schools. The principal-agent problem arises under conditions of incomplete and asymmetric information when the principal hires an agent. The government is the owner of grants whereas school is the agent to deal with government financial supports. Schools receive government grants based on performance measures. On the other hand, the government allocates the resource of educational expense fairly and efficiently according to signals released. Adjusted over time, government grants will reflect the substance of school performance when the mechanism regarding government grants effectively captures performance measures under the circumstances of no interference. The analyses are based on data collected from 2004 to 2008. The empirical results show that over time, the magnitude of change regarding government grants will be approach to zero when the school's performance is relatively stable. That is when the school's performance fixed on a certain level, the magnitude of change regarding government grants will tend to converge. It indicates that Regulations for Subsidy and Award Regarding Private Universities and Colleges can evaluate the school's performance effectively, capture performance measures, and allocate the resource of educational expense fairly and efficiently.
|
参考文献
|
-
李政翰(2008)。我國大學自我評鑑的實施與發展。學校行政,54,175-192。
連結:
-
張文瀞、周玲臺(2005)。財務報表簽證與私立大學校院營運效率之研究。管理評論,24(2),116-136。
連結:
-
黃俊傑(2008)。教育績效責任對學校經營的啟示。學校行政,55,154-168。
連結:
-
Banker, R. D.,Charnes, A.,Cooper, W. W.(1984).Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis.Management Science,30(9),1078-1092.
-
Charnes, A.,Cooper, W. W.,Rhodes, E.(1978).Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.European Journal of Operational Research,2,429-444.
-
Fama, E. F.,Jensen, M. C.(1983).Separation of ownership and control.Journal of Law & Economics,26(2),301-325.
-
Jensen, M. C.,Meckling, W. H.(1976).Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360.
-
Kaplan, R. S.,Grossman, A. S.(2010).The emerging capital market for nonprofits.Harvard Business Review,88(10),110-118.
-
吳清山、林天祐(2002)。教育名詞─績效責任。教育研究月刊,83,139-140。
-
胡維新、賴永裕(2012)。政府獎補助款與私立大專院校經營績效之關係研究。人文與應用科學期刊,特刊,97-109。
-
楊朝祥(2007)。紓解高等技職教育發展困境之評鑑策略。「大學評鑑與提升大學教學品質」學術研討會,台北:
-
賴永裕、胡維新、郭佳如(2011)。私立大專院校辦學績效、財務資訊揭露對補助與募款關聯性之研究。教育政策論壇,14(2),65-89。
|