校務評鑑人員認證的阻礙與因應

The Obstacle and Solution of School Evaluators' Qualification

10.3966/160683002013110088010

曾淑惠(Shu-Hui Tseng)；蔡銘修(Ming-Hsiu Tsai)

校務評鑑人員 ； 認證 ； 檢定 ； 資格審查 ； 發給執照 ； school evaluator ； qualification ； certification ； credentialing ； licensing

學校行政

88期（2013 / 11 / 01）

207 - 229

繁體中文

近年來因積極開展校務評鑑工作，對教師評鑑有長足的發展，然一個優質評鑑的有效執行，有賴於評鑑委員熟悉品質經營系統原則以及客觀證據的尋求能力，但國內部分學校對校務評鑑人員的認證方式並非十分認同。本研究旨在調查學校校長及教師對校務評鑑人員認證阻礙與因應策略。採專家訪談及問卷調查法，計訪談19位關係人並調查2326位各級學校校長及教師對認證阻礙與因應策略的意見，共回收1670份，有效回收率71.8％，接著採用驗證性因素分析獲得評鑑人員認證阻礙之聚歛效度，並以最大概似法估計參數來檢驗評鑑人員認證阻礙各構面。研究結論包括：（1）校務評鑑人員認證的15項阻礙歸納為內在認知、外在動機以及外部環境等三要素；（2）認證阻礙的因應策略共25項，均獲得教師高度認同，其中建立評鑑人才庫、應有評鑑參與認證訓練者的評鑑制度、及事前公布認證過程及審核機制三項策略最受認同。最後根據研究結果提出三項具體建議：（1）界定認證阻礙因應策略的負責機構，並責成各負責機構進行有效的推展；（2）持續倡議評鑑人員專業發展的重要性，形塑評鑑人員認證的氛圍；（3）先行研議評鑑人員認證的配套措施。

School evaluation has been carried out actively in recent years, generating increasing progress in teacher evaluation. An effective implementation of a high quality evaluation depends on school evaluators' familiarity of the principles of quality management system as well as their ability to seek evidences objectively. However, some schools in Taiwan did not completely agree with the school evaluators' qualification method. This study aims to investigate the obstacle and solution of school evaluators' qualification from teachers at all levels of schools. To achieve the purpose, 19 evaluators were interviewed and questionnaires were administered to 2326 teachers to obtain their opinions concerning the obstacles for obtaining qualification and their strategy to cope with the matter. A total of 1670 questionnaires were collected with 71.8% response rate. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to obtain the convergent validity for the obstacle of school evaluators' qualification, and the maximum likelihood estimation parameters was used to test each dimension of the obstacles of school evaluators' qualification. The results are as follows: 1. The 15 obstacles of school evaluators' qualification fall into three dimensions: intrinsic cognition, extrinsic motivation, and external environment. 2. There were 25 solutions to overcome the obstacle of evaluators' qualification that were highly-recognized, and the top three identified were: to establish agency for evaluators, to establish an evaluation system for evaluators and recognized trainees, and to pre-announce evaluation process and provide moderation mechanism. Based on the results, three concrete suggestions are provided. First, identify the responsible organizations to assist in overcoming the obstacles encountered in obtaining evaluators' qualification. Second, continuously advocate the importance of the school evaluators' professional development, shaping the need for school evaluators' qualification in the academia. Third, deliberate the supporting measures of school evaluators' qualification in advance.

1. Altschuld, J. W.(1999).The certification of evaluators: Highlights for a report submitted to board of directions of the American Evaluation Association.American Journal of Evaluation,20(3),481-493.
2. Altschuld, J. W.(2005).Certification, credentialing, licensure, competencies, and the like: Issues confronting the field of evaluation.Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation,20(2),157-168.
3. Altschuld, J. W.(1999).The case for a voluntary system for credentialing evaluators.American Journal of Evaluation,20(3),507-517.
4. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
5. Bickman, L.(1999).AEA bold or timid?.American Journal of Evaluation,20(3),519-520.
6. Bogardus, A. M.(2009).PHR/SPHR: Professional in human resources certification study guide.Indianapolis, Indiana:Wiley.
7. Cleary, H.(1995).The credentialing of health evaluators: An historical account 1970-1990.New York:NCHEC.
8. Cousins, J. B.,Cullen, J.,Marlik, S.,Maicher, B.(2009).Debating professional designations for evaluators: Reflections on the Canadian process.Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation,6(11),71-82.
9. Jacob, S.,Boisvert, Y.(2010).To be or not to be a profession: Pros, cons and challenges for evaluation.Evaluation,16(4),349-369.
10. James, S. C.,Worthen, B. R.(1999).AEA members' opinions concerning evaluator certification.American Journal of Evaluation,20(3),495-506.
11. Kellaghan, T.(ed.),Stufflebeam, D.(ed.),Wingate, L. A.(ed.)(2003).International handbook of educational evaluation.Netherlands:Kluwer.
12. Kline, R. B.(2005).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford.
13. Love, A. J.(1994).Should evaluators be certified?.New Directions for Program Evaluation,62,29-40.
14. Mathison, S.(ed.)(2005).Encyclopedia of Evaluation.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
15. McDavid, J.,Kuji-Shikatani, K.,Dumaine, F.,Dandurand, Y.(2010).Credentialing professional evaluators in Canada.2010 annual CES conference,Victoria, BC:
16. Mcdonald, R. P.,Ho, M. R.(2002).Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis.Psychological Methods,7,64-82.
17. Smith, M. F.(1999).Should AEA begin a process for restricting membership in the professional evaluation?.American Journal of Evaluation,20(3),521-532.
18. Stevahn, L.,King, J. A.,Ghere, G.,Minnema, J.(2005).Establishing Essential Competencies for program Evaluators.American Journal of Evaluation,26(1),43-59.
19. Swain, E. I.(2000).Toward clarification of program evaluation: A proposal with implications for the possible certification of evaluators.American Journal of Evaluation,21(2),231-237.
20. Tabachnick, B. G.,Fidell, L. S.(2007).Using multivariate statistics.Boston, MA:Pearson Education.
21. Taylor, L.(2007).FISMA certification& accreditation handbook.Canada:Syngress Publishing, Inc.
22. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat(2005).,T. K. Gussman Associate Inc..
23. Worthen, B. R.(1999).Critical challenges confronting certification of evaluators.American Journal of Evaluation,20(3),533-555.
24. 吳清山(2010)。落實評鑑委員研習課程 提升評鑑品質與效能。評鑑雙月刊，24，9-14。
25. 徐慧嬛(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所。
26. 曾憲政、陳善德(2008)。評鑑委員培訓是優質評鑑的關鍵。評鑑雙月刊，13，42-44。
27. 鄺海音(2008)。評鑑中心將建立評鑑委員認證制度。評鑑雙月刊，11，43。

1. 鄭進斛(2015)。國民小學校務評鑑指標建構之研究。教育經營與管理研究集刊，11，59-88。