题名

國民小學校長學術樂觀與學校效能關係之研究

并列篇名

The Study on the Relationships between Primary School's Principal Academic Optimism and School Effectiveness

DOI

10.3966/160683002015070098001

作者

謝傳崇(Chuan-Chung Hsieh);陳愛玲(Ai-Ling Chen)

关键词

校長領導 ; 校長學術樂觀 ; 學校效能 ; 學術樂觀 ; academic optimism ; principal leadership ; principal academic optimism ; school effectiveness

期刊名称

學校行政

卷期/出版年月

98期(2015 / 07 / 01)

页次

1 - 22

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在了解國民小學校長學術樂觀與學校效能之現況與關係。在研究方法採行問卷調查法,並編製「國民小學校長學術樂觀與學校效能調查問卷」,研究對象為臺灣地區國民小學教師,並使用結構方程模式驗證校長學術樂觀與學校效能之關係。研究結果顯示校長學術樂觀與學校效能現況良好,兩者之間是有相關性,也獲得良好適配度的影響關係模式。校長學術樂觀與學校效能有顯著之直接影響效果。本研究建議校長能與同仁、家長與學生充分溝通了解,凝聚教育共識;推動教育行政機關,培養領導者效能感;領導者多運用學術樂觀策略,營造校園優質的學習環境;倍增教師教學能力,增強學生學習成就,而提升學校的效能。

英文摘要

This study aims to understand the current status and relationships between Primary School's principal academic optimism and school effectiveness. It uses questionnaire survey as research methods, and draws up "Questionnaires of relationships between Primary School's principal academic optimism and school effectiveness." The teachers in Primary School in Taiwan area are the study subjects; besides, the relationships between Primary School's principal academic optimism and school effectiveness can be verified by the use of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in this study. The results show that there are positive correlations between principal academic optimism and school effectiveness, and that there is also goodness of fit between the two. In addition, the study also confirms that principal's academic optimism has a direct and significant effect on school effectiveness. This study suggests that principal should have a complete communication with colleagues, parents and students to have an agreement in education; next, he should promote executive service, and cultivate efficacy of leadership. Leaders should create a qualified learning environment on campus, multiply teaching capabilities, enhance student achievement, and enhance the school effectiveness in the long run via the strategy of principal's academic optimism.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 張奕華、許正妹、顏弘欽(2011)。「國民小學教師學術樂觀量表」之發展與衡量。測驗學刊,58,261-289。
    連結:
  2. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York:Freeman.
  3. Coleman, J. S.,Campbell, E. Q.,Hobson, C. J.,McPartland, F.,Mood, A. M.,Weinfeld, F. D.(1966).Equality of educational opportunity.Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
  4. Dimmock, C.,Hattie, J.(1996).School principals' self-efficacy and its measurement in a context of restructuring.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,7(1),62-75.
  5. Hoy, W. K.,Tarter, C. J.,Woolfolk Hoy, A.(2006).Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement.American Educational Research Journal,43(3),425-446.
  6. Hoy, W.、Miskel, C.G.、林明地譯(2013)。教育行政學:理論、研究與實務。高雄市:麗文。
  7. Levine, L. U.,Lezotte, L. L.(1990).Unusually effective school: A review and analysis 25 of research and practice.Madison, WI:National Center for Effective School Research and Development.
  8. Luthans, F.,Youssef, C. M.,Avolio, B. J.(2007).Psychological capital.UK:Oxford University Press.
  9. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric Theory.New York:Mcgraw-Hill.
  10. Riegel, L. A.(2012).Department of Philosophy, Ohio State University.
  11. Seligman, M. E.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2000).Positive psychology.American Psychologist,55(1),5-14.
  12. Smith, P. A.,Hoy, W. K.(2007).Academic optimism and student achievement in urban elementary schools.Journal of Educational Administration,45,556-568.
  13. Snyder, C. R.(Ed.),Lopen, S. J.(Ed.)(2002).Handbook of positive psychology.New York:Oxford University Press.
  14. Tschannen-Moran, M.,Gareis, C.(2004).Principals' sense of efficacy: Assessing a promising construct.Journal of Educational Administration,42(5),573-585.
  15. Wallace Foundation(2011).Research findings to support effective educational policies: A guide for policymakers.New York:Wallace Foundation.
  16. Ware, H.,Kitsantas, A.(2011).Predicting teacher commitment using principal and teacher efficacy variables: An HLM approach.The Journal of Educational Research,104,183-193.
  17. 吳宗立(2005)。學校行政決策。高雄市:麗文。
  18. 吳明隆、涂金堂(2012)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北:五南。
  19. 吳清山(1998)。學校效能研究。臺北市:五南。
  20. 吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書。臺北市:高等教育。
  21. 柯文成(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東縣,國立屏東教育大學。
  22. 張奕華、許正妹、顏弘欽(2011)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
  23. 莊文瑋(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園市,國立中央大學。
  24. 溫明麗(2008)。教育101。臺北市:高等教育。
  25. 蔡進雄(2004)。校長自我效能感之模式建構與提升策略。國教學報,16,35-48。
  26. 鄭彩鳳(2001)。教育改革中校長工作滿意、校長效能與學校效能之研究:國小校長之訪談研究。教育學刊,17,163-180。
  27. 謝傳崇(2013)。校長學術樂觀的意涵與價值。師友月刊,5,45-48。
  28. 謝傳崇(2012)。校長正向領導。臺北市:高等教育。
  29. 謝傳崇(2013)。卓越領導的核心信念:校長學術樂觀。台灣教育評論月刊,2(5),30-32。
  30. 謝傳崇(2013)。十二年國教的挑戰:找回學術樂觀。教育人力與專業發展,30(3),25-34。
  31. 謝傳崇、李芳茹(2010)。應用結構方程模式探討學校創新經營與學校效能之關係。臺灣教育發展論壇,2,75-95。
  32. 顏國樑、任育騰(2013)。透過組織公平,組織信任提升學校效能。臺灣研究月刊,232,48-65。
被引用次数
  1. 廖梅君(2022)。校長凝聚力領導與教師學術樂觀關係之研究。學校行政,137,74-91。
  2. 余惠瑄(2019)。國小校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能之關係。學校行政,122,37-66。
  3. (2016)。分布式領導、完全領導、家長式領導與學校效能關係之研究:以教師組織公民行為為中介。教育行政與評鑑學刊,19,17-40。
  4. (2020)。國民小學正向教育、教師幸福感與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究,43(1),33-62。