價值增加模式運用於教師效能評鑑之探討

Inquiry on Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation with Value-Added Models

10.3966/160683002016030102008

張伯瑲(Bor-Chiang Chang)

價值增加模式 ； 教師效能評鑑 ； 學生測驗成績 ； Value-Added Models ； teacher effectiveness evaluation ； student test scores

學校行政

102期（2016 / 03 / 16）

120 - 139

繁體中文

本文透過文獻探討採用學生測驗成績進行教師效能評鑑的發展脈絡與議題，美國的教師評鑑近年來倡行實施直接採用學生在標準測驗中的評量分數的價值增加模式（VAM），VAM 是一項以學生在標準化測驗的成績來量化教師效能的統計工具，支持者認為可以把特定教師價值增加的程度獨立出來，可以區分教師有效能或無效能，但批評者認為價值增加評估是不可靠的。綜合文獻，本文提出VAM討論的議題包括：1.教師與學生的非隨機分配、2.不穩定的教師成就評量結果、3.教師效用難以獨立、4.窄化課程與教學、5.不利教師協同與合作、6.邊際誤差的問題、7.忽略學生需求、8.資料錯誤的後果，最後本文提出採用VAM進行教師效能評鑑的建議，包括：1.避免高比重的價值增加評鑑、2.注意評鑑的要素、3.較適用於群體評鑑、4.用做教師專業發展計畫、5.減少誤差的影響和6.對評鑑結果進行檢視及評鑑。

The objective of this paper is inquiry the context and issuses about using student test scores to evaluate teacher effectiveness. In recent years, Value-Added Models (VAM) have been adopted to evaluate teachers in USA. Advocators claim that VAM is useful when one wants to know how a particular teacher's contributions to student improvement compare to the average teacher, then they can distinguish ＂effective＂ or ＂ineffective＂ teachers. Therefore, more student Value-Added scores more teaching effective. Opponents considered that VAM is unreliable and could not be used to rank teachers. Finally, there are many suggestions listed in this paper , includeing: (1). avoid high weights for Value-Added evaluation; (2). pay attention to all components of the evaluation; (3). be appropriate used for teams evaluation; (4). be one of the teacher professional development plans; (5). reduce the influence of error and (6). continually evaluate the evaluations.

1. Hanushek, E. A., (2002). Teacher quality (Hoover Press, 2002) .Retrieved from University of Standford, The Economic Policy Institute website: http://www-hoover. stanford.edu/publications/books/teacher.html#toc
2. 教育部（2015）。教師專業發展評鑑網。取自http://tepd.moe.gov.tw/chinese/04_ situation/00_overview.php
3. U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Overview Information;Race to the Top Fund; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010;Notice (Federal Register 75, 71 , 19496–19531). Retrieved from :http://www2.ed.gov/legislation/ FedRegister/announcements/2010-2/041410a.pdf
4. Medina, J. (2010, May 10)"Agreement Will Alter Teacher Evaluations," The New York Times . Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
5. Medina, J. (2008, January 21). "New York Measuring Teachers by Test Scores," The New York Times . Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
6. Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access, UCLA (2012). Value Added? (ED532056). Retrieved from UCLA Website http://idea.gseis.ucla.edu/publications /publications/value-added
7. Baker, E. L.,Barton, P. E.,Hammond, L. D.,Haertel, E.,Ladd, H. F.,Linn, R . L.,Shepard, L. A.(2010).,未出版
8. Braun, H. I.(2005).,未出版
9. Burns, R. B.,Mason, D. A.(1998).Class formation and composition in elementary schools..American Educational Research Journal,35(4),739-772.
10. Carlo, M. D.(2012).How to use value-added measures right.Educational Leadership,70(3),38-42.
11. Chukwubikem, P. E. I.(2013).Developing Better Teacher Evaluation.Journal of Educational and Social Research,3(6),41-58.
12. Corcoran, S. P.(2010).,未出版
13. Everson, K. C.,Feinauer, E.,Sudweeks, R. R.(2013).Rethinking Teacher Evaluation:A Conversation about Statistical Inferences and Value-Added Models.Harvard Educational Review,83(2),349-402.
14. Goldhaber, D.,Theobald, R.(2012).,未出版
15. Gordon, R.,Kane, T.,Staiger, D. O.(2006).,未出版
16. Harris, D. N.(2010).Value-Added Measures of Education Performance:Clearing Away the Smoke and Mirrors.School of Education, Standford University.
17. Harris, D.,Sass, T.(2010).,未出版
18. Isoré, M.(2009).Teacher Evaluation: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review.
19. Koedel, C.,Betts, J.(2011).Does student sorting invalidate value-added models of teacher effectiveness? An extended analysis of the Rothstein critique.Education Finance and Policy,6(1),18-42.
20. Lyon, L.K.(2009).Lindenwood University.
21. McCaffrey, D.,Sass, T.,Lockwood, J. R.(2008).,未出版
22. MetLife(2013).,未出版
23. Newton, X. A.,Darling-Hammond, L.,Haertel, E.,Thomas, E.(2010).Value-Added Modeling of Teacher Effectiveness: An Exploration of Stability across Models and Contexts.Education Policy Analysis Archives,18(23),1-27.
24. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development(2005).Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers.OECD.
25. Rivkin, S. G.,Hanushek, E. A.,Kain, J. F.(2005).Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.Econometrica,73(2),417-458.
26. Rockoff, J. E.(2003).,未出版
27. Rothstein, J.(2009).Student sorting and bias in value-added estimation: Selection on observables and unobservables.Education Finance and Policy,4(4),537-571.
28. Scherrer, J.(2012).What's the value of VAM (value-added modeling)?.Phi Delta Kappan,93(8),58-60.
29. Smagorinsky, P.(2014).Authentic teacher evaluation:a two-tiered proposal for formative and summative assessment.English education,46(2),165-185.
30. 秦夢群、陳清溪、吳政達、郭昭佑(2011)。,新北市:國家教育研究院。
31. 教育部(2002)。2001年教育改革之檢討與改進建議大會結論暨建議資料彙編。臺北市:教育部。
32. 顏國樑(2003)。教師評鑑的基本理念、問題及作法。教育研究月刊，112，62-77。