應用社會網絡分析探討學習領導與科技領導及其他變項之關係

Using Social Network Analysis to Study the Relationships among Learning Leadership, Technology Leadership and Other Variables

10.3966/160683002017010107004

葉連祺(Lain-Chyi Yeh)

學習領導 ； 科技領導 ； 校長領導 ； 社會網絡分析 ； leadership for learning ； learning leadership ； principal leadership ； social network analysis ； technology leadership

學校行政

107期（2017 / 01 / 16）

59 - 82

繁體中文

學習領導和科技領導是教育領導研究的重要主題，兩者對學校教育發展有益，已知不少探討其與相關變項關係的研究成果，但是研究發現繁雜，有必要統整和推導可研究焦點關係。本文聚焦分析學習領導和科技領導的影響關係，指出兩者有兩種名稱及三類意涵，從論理分析提出兩者有多種可能關係，也討論應用社會網絡分析統整學位論文有關研究成果及推導可行研究變項關係的方法，並提出一套系統性分析理念和分析程序。運用社會網絡分析檢視臺灣地區博碩士學位論文的研究成果，發現科技領導與頗多變項形成影響關係，科技領導多為前置變項，或為結果變項，科技領導和相關變項的影響關係網絡鬆散，顯示未來可研究處甚多，另依據指數分析結果推導出未來研究學習領導、科技領導和其他變項可探討的關係。

Both learning leadership and technology leadership are important topics in educational leadership studies, also all benefit to the developments of school education. Several studies discussed the related variables and earning leadership and technology leadership, but their findings were various. It is necessary to integrate and infer the variables' relationships. The study focused on discussing the influential relationships between learning leadership and technology leadership. Based on the findings from Google Scholar Search, both learning leadership and technology leadership had two different terminologies and three meanings. Using theoretical analysis, various available relationships were revealed between learning leadership and technology leadership. Social network analysis was used to synthesize the findings of themes, and deduce various available methods to study the relationships between variables. Furthermore a systematic analytic idea and analytic procedure were proposed. Based upon review the findings of thesis in Taiwan, it showed both learning leadership and technology leadership were correlated with other variables. Technology leadership worked as antecedent variable or outcome variable. The network showed various influence relationships in Technology leadership and other variables which were loose. Many topics about learning leadership and technology leadership can be studied in future. Moreover some available relationships among learning leadership, technology leadership and other variables in future studies based on index analysis were discussed.

1. Amey, M.(2004).Learning leadership in today's community colleges.Community College Journal,74(4),6-9.
2. Anderson, R. E.,Dexter, S.(2005).School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect.Educational Administration Quarterly,41(1),49-82.
3. Binard, K.,Brungardt, C.(1997).Learning leadership: Assessing students at the community college of Denver.Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,4(4),128-140.
4. Carolan, B. V.(2014).Social network analysis and education: Theory, methods & applications.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
5. Carrington, P. J.(Ed.),Scott, J.(Ed.),Wasserman, S.(Ed.)(2005).Models and methods in social network analysis.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
6. Cheung, M. W. L.,Chan, W.(2005).Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach.Psychological methods,10(1),40-64.
7. Cooper, H.(2017).Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
8. de Nooy, W.,Mrvar, A.,Batagelj, V.(2011).Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
9. Dexter, S.,Herring, M.,Thomas, T.(2012).Editorial: Technology leadership for the teacher education initiative.Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,12(3),255-263.
10. Flanagan, L.,Jacobsen, M.(2003).Technology leadership for the twenty‐first century principal.Journal of Educational Administration,41(2),124-142.
11. Forman, D. H.(1958).Learning leadership in workshops.The American Journal of Nursing,58(2),205-207.
12. Fransen, K.,Van Puyenbroeck, S.,Loughead, T.,Vanbeselaere, N.,de Cuyper, B.,Vande Broek, G.,Boen, F.(2015).The art of athlete leadership: Identifying high-quality leadership at the individual and team level through social network analysis.Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,37(3),274-290.
13. Hallinger, P.(2011).Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research.Journal of Educational Administration,49(2),125-142.
14. Hoppe, B.,Reinelt, C.(2010).Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks.The Leadership Quarterly,21(4),600-619.
15. Knapp, M. S.,Copland, M. A.,Honig, M. I.,Plecki, M. L.,Portin, B. S.(2010).Learning-focused leadership and leadership support: Meaning and practice in urban systems.Seattle, WA:Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
16. Knoke, D.,Yang, S.(2007).Social network analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE Publications.
17. Lippitt, G. L.(1970).Leadership for learning. Training and development in the 70's.
18. Pitts, V. M.,Spillane, J. P.(2009).Using social network methods to study school leadership.International Journal of Research & Method in Education,32(2),185-207.
19. Scott, J.(2012).Social network analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE Publications.
20. Story, J.(Ed.)(2004).Leadership in organizations: Current issues and key trends.New York, NY:Routledge.
21. Toll, C. A.(2010).6 Steps to learning leadership.Journal of Staff Development,31(3),50.
22. Wang, Y.(2014).University of Cincinnati.
23. Wasserman, S.,Faust, K.(1994).Social network analysis: Methods and applications.New York, NY:Cambridge university press.
24. 王陸(2009)。典型的社會網路分析軟體工具及分析方法。中國電化教育，267，95-100。
25. 吳清山、林天祐(2006)。科技領導。教育資料與研究，71，196。
26. 吳清山、林天祐(2012)。學習領導。教育研究月刊，217，139-140。
27. 林明地(2013)。學習領導：理念與實際初探。教育研究月刊，229，18-31。
28. 林聚任(2009)。社會網路分析理論、方法與應用。北京:北京師範大學出版社。
29. 瞿海源編、畢恆達編、劉長萱編、楊國樞編(2012)。社會及行為科學研究法：總論與量化研究法。臺北:東華。
30. 顏端武、王曰芬、李飛(2007)。國外人際網路分析的典型軟體工具。現代圖書情報技術，155，6-11。

1. 劉乙儀,張瑞村(2019)。幼兒園園長學習領導之初探。學校行政，120，78-93。
2. 張維修(2018)。校長科技領導運用於學校系統改善之研究。清華教育學報，35(1)，29-69。
3. (2019)。社會網絡分析應用在初任校長導入方案對校長專業發展成效分析之研究。教育與心理研究，42(2)，31-53。