探究親師衝突的危機－建構教師正向的情意特質

Exploring the Crisis of Parent-Teacher Conflicts-Constructing Teachers' Positive Affection

10.3966/160683002017050109007

張裕程(YU-CHENG CHANG)

親師溝通 ； 親師衝突 ； 教師情意特質 ； parent-teacher communication ； parent-teacher conflicts ； Teacher's affection characteristics

學校行政

109期（2017 / 05 / 16）

123 - 137

繁體中文

本文從親師衝突的危機出發，探究教師在親師溝通之間應具備的角色及態度，尤其以建構教師的情意知能作為化解親師衝突的最重要契機。文中首先進行文獻探討以建立理論基礎，隨後採取焦點訪談法，訪問兩位家長及一位現職教師，其中一位家長曾經具有與教師衝突的經驗，以訪談的內容編碼後作為本文論述的資料。研究發現在親師溝通時，教師展現的「熱情」及「關懷」的情意特質，是避免親師衝突的最重要方式。最後，本文提出四點避免親師衝突的建議，分別是（一）積極辦理教師情意培能研習及情意素養工作坊，以協助教師增進情意知能。（二）鼓勵教師成立專業發展社群，成立教師學習共同體，以建構自身具備熱情及關懷特質的情意。（三）學校應鼓勵教師多與家長溝通與接觸，不但能夠促進雙方的信任，亦能夠增進教師溝通分享的機會與經驗。（四）校長應成為典範，並建構溫馨且支持的行政體系，協助教師解決與家長溝通的困難。

This paper explores the roles and attitudes of teacher in the communication between parents and teachers, especially the construction of teachers' feelings of emotion as the most important opportunity to resolve the parent-teacher conflicts. In this paper, we first discuss the literature to establish the theoretical basis, then take the focus of the interview, visit the two parents and a teacher, one of the parents had a conflict with the teacher, the contents of the interview as the information discussed in this article. The study found that the teacher's ＂passion＂ and ＂caring＂ emotional characteristics were the most important way to avoid the parent-teacher conflicts. Finally, this paper proposes four suggestions to avoid the parent-teacher conflicts. □1□Conducting emotional training and workshops studies to improve teacher's emotional knowledge. □2□To encourage teachers to set up professional community, to build their own enthusiasm and caring qualities of affection. □3□The policy should encourage teachers to communicate with their parents, not only to promote the trust of both parties, but also to enhance and experience of teachers to share. □4□The principal should become a model and construct a warm and supportive administrative system to solve the difficulties of communicating with their parents.

1. 黃怡雯(2006)。學校如何在親師衝突的夾縫中求生機—探究衝突的原因、功能及因應策略。學校行政，45，226-236。
   連結：
2. 台灣社會信任度調查 法官、記者信任度吊車尾。【台灣社會信任度調查】（ 2016年5月24日）。天下雜誌。取自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article. action?id=5076475
3. Blase, J.(Ed.),Anderson, G.(Ed.)(1995).The micropolitics of educational leadership.London UK:Cassell.
4. Blue-Banning, M.,Summers, J. A.,Frankland, H. C.,Nelson, L. L.,Beegle, G.(2004).Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration.Exceptional children,70(2),167-184.
5. Couchenour, D.,Chrisman, K.(2011).Families, schools, and communities: Together for young children.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
6. Gorman, J. C.(2004).Working with challenging parents of students with special needs.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
7. Lindle, J. C.(1999).What can the study of micropolitics contribute to the practice of leadership in reforming schools?.School Leadership & Management,19(2),171-178.
8. Olender, R. A.,Elias, J.,Mastroleo, R. D.(2010).The school-home connection: Forging positive relationships with parents.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
9. Olsen, G. W.,Fuller, M. L.(2012).Home and school relations: Teachers and parents working together.Boston, MA:Pearson.
10. Olsen, G. W.,Fuller, M. L.(2008).Home-school relations: Working successfully with parents and families.Boston, MA:Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
11. Rahim, M. A.(1986).Managing Conflict in Organizations.New York:Praeger.
12. 王淑俐(2012)。人際關係與溝通（第三版）。臺北市:三民。
13. 王淑俐(1994)。為師最樂：現代師生倫理與溝通技巧。臺北市:南宏。
14. 李宗杰(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，國立臺中教育大學教育學系。
15. 李俐瑩(2014)。教師課題―親師衝突與對策理論與實例分析。臺灣教育評論月刊，3(1)，84-90。
16. 林清江(1995)。多元與卓越。師友月刊，335，35-40。
17. 林鳳婷(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮市，國立東華大學教育研究所。
18. 林蘭櫻(2004)。家長教育選擇權之探究。研習資訊，21(5)，61-68。
19. 許芳菊(2011)。當怪獸家長遇上刺蝟老師…親師大戰為何一觸即發？。親子天下雜誌，29
20. 廖麗雲(2011)。親師溝通，從友善開始。師友月刊，532，95-97。
21. 鍾育琦(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東縣，國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。

1. 游心慈,陳慧娟(2022)。成為青少年社會情緒學習的楷模：後疫情時代親師合作的新視角。中等教育，73(1)，51-70。