領導變項及其發展

Leader Variables and Its Development

10.3966/160683002017070110002

葉連祺(LAIN-CHYI YEH)

引用分析 ； 教育領導 ； 文獻計量學 ； 領導者變項 ； citation analysis ； educational leadership ； Bibliometrics ； leader variable

學校行政

110期（2017 / 07 / 16）

24 - 57

繁體中文

領導者變項是領導模式的要素，但迄無相關研究。本研究討論其理論基礎和研究課題，提出定義、確認規準、分類架構和體系。結合文獻計量學和引用分析，檢索Google Scholar及其他資料庫，以多向搜尋－交叉確認法獲得203個領導者變項。分析發現Google Scholar資料可得變項多於其他資料庫，leader behavior、leader development、leader effectiveness、leader-member exchange最受重視，臺灣研究有探討變項豐富性低、探討變項集中化、探討時間較晚且較早停止等現象，整體以外在表現類和內在條件類變項最多而影響成果類者最少，能形成四個層次的變項階層體系，整個領導者變項發展經歷四個成長階段和兩個老化階段，呈現成長趨緩而老化加速的情形，另提出四種新變項衍生規則和跨類別變項差序衍生規律。

Leader variables are important components in leadership models, but less study concerned. This study discussed relative theoretical bases and research topics about leader variable, and proposed its definition, confirmed criteria, classification frame as well as whole variable system. Both of Bibliometrics and citation analysis were applied as research methods. 202 leader variables were obtained by the multi-ways search and cross-verification method (MSCV) from Google Scholar database and others. The results showed that Google Scholar database found variables more than other databases. In addition, leader behavior, leader development, leader effectiveness and leader-member exchange were all popular, but others were cited a little. Taiwan studies about leader variables have showed some interesting phenomenon includes lower richness in studying variables, studying concentrate in few variables, the beginning of exploring more slowly, and the stopping of exploring more fast. All leader variables classified to external performance and internal condition were most, on the other hand, these belonged to influence outcome were least. Moreover the development of whole variables could illustrate by four growing periods and two fading periods. Four derived rules to generate new leader variables and a differential derived phenomenon in generating cross-category variables were also provided.

1. 葉連祺(2013)。教育領導研究可探討什麼？。學校行政，84，1-35。
   連結：
2. Aguillo, I. F.(2012).Is Google Scholar useful for Bibliometrics? A webometric analysis.Scientometrics,91(2),343-351.
3. Alonso, S.,Cabrerizo, F. J.,Herrera-Viedma, E.,Herrera, F.(2009).h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields.Journal of Informetrics,3(4),273-289.
4. Althouse, B. M.,West, J. D.,Bergstrom, C. T.,Bergstrom, T.(2009).Differences in impact factor across fields and over time.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(1),27-34.
5. Amancio, D. R.,Nunes, M. G. V.,Oliveira, O. N., Jr.,Costa, L. D. F.(2012).Using complex networks concepts to assess approaches for citations in scientific papers.Scientometrics,91(3),827-842.
6. Bornmann, L.,Mutz, R.,Hug, S. E.,Daniel, H. D.(2011).A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h-index and 37 different h-index variants.Journal of Informetrics,5(3),346-359.
7. Bryman, A.(Ed.),Collinson, D. L.(Ed.),Grint, K.(Ed.),Jackson, B.(Ed.),Uhl-Bien, M.(Ed.)(2011).The SAGE handbook of leadership.London:Sage Publications Ltd..
8. Chen, Y. S.,Leimkuhler, F. F.(1987).Bradford's law: An index approach.Scientometrics,11(3&4),183-198.
9. Day, D. V.(Ed.),Antonakis, J.(Ed.)(2012).The nature of leadership.Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE Publications.
10. de Winter, J. C.,Zadpoor, A. A.,Dodou, D.(2014).The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: A longitudinal study.Scientometrics,98(2),1547-1565.
11. DeRue, D. S.,Nahrgang, J. D.,Wellman, N.,Humphrey, S. E.(2011).Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta‐analytic test of their relative validity.Personnel Psychology,64,7-52.
12. Drott, M. C.(1981).Bradford's law: Theory, empiricism and the gaps between.Bibliometrics,30(1),41-52.
13. DuBrin, A. J.(2013).Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills (7th ed.).Mason, OH:South-Western, Cengage Learning.
14. Garfield, E.(2006).The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.The Journal of the American Medical Association,295(1),90-93.
15. Hallinger, P.(2011).A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly,47(2),271-306.
16. Harzing, A. W.(2013).A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: A longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners.Scientometrics,94(3),1057-1075.
17. Hirsch, J. E.(2005).An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102(46),16569-16572.
18. Hubert, J. J.(1981).General Bibliometric models.Bibliometrics,30(1),65-81.
19. Kaiser, R. B.,Overfield, D. V.(2010).The leadership value chain.The Psychologist- Manager Journal,13(3),164-183.
20. Li, J.,Burnham, J. F.,Lemley, T.,Britton, R. M.(2010).Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of ScienceR, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar.Journal of electronic resources in medical libraries,7(3),196-217.
21. Mingers, J.,Lipitakis, E. A.(2010).Counting the citations: A comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management.Scientometrics,85(2),613-625.
22. Pierce, J. L.(Ed.),Newstrom, J. W.(Ed.)(2010).Leaders and the leadership process: Readings, self-assessments and applications (6th ed.).New York, NY:McGraw- Hill/Irwin.
23. Pislyakov, V.(2009).Comparing two "thermometers": Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to Journal Citation Reports and Scopus.Scientometrics,79(3),541-550.
24. Poiter, W. G.(1981).Lotka's law revisited.Bibliometrics,30(1),21-39.
25. Repanovici, A.,Rogozea, L.,Ratulea, G.(2010).Computational methods used for information technology impact in Scientometric studies for scientific production.Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS international conference on Mathematical and computational methods in science and engineering,Stevens Point, WI:
26. Ruch, S.,Ball, R.(2012).Various correlations between the h-index and citation rate (CPP) in neuroscience and quantum physics: New findings.International Journal of Information Science and Management,8(1),1-19.
27. Seglen, P. O.(1997).Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.British Medical Journal,314(15),498-513.
28. van Aalst, J.(2010).Using Google Scholar to estimate the impact of journal articles in education.Educational Researcher,39(5),387-400.
29. Vanclay, J. K.(2012).Impact factor: Outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?.Scientometrics,92(2),211-238.
30. Wyllys, R. E.(1981).Empirical and theoretical bases of Zipf's law.Bibliometrics,30(1),53-64.
31. Yukl, G.(2012).Leadership in organizations (8th ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
32. 秦夢群(2013)。教育領導理論與應用（二版）。臺北=Taipei, ROC:五南=Wu-Nan Book。
33. 鄭燕祥(2003)。教育領導與改革：新範式。臺北=Taipei, ROC:高等教育=Higher Education。

1. 葉連祺(2018)。教育管理變項研究主題與計量分析方法之綜析。學校行政，114，150-182。
2. 葉連祺(2018)。教育領導變項與教育管理變項體系研究。學校行政，117，1-72。
3. 張芳敏(2018)。Empowerment衍生概念之發展與引用。學校行政，117，180-196。